collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by MU82
[May 09, 2025, 08:33:38 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by muwarrior69
[May 09, 2025, 05:02:23 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]


Pope Leo XIV by tower912
[May 08, 2025, 09:06:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[May 08, 2025, 01:47:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Johnny B


The Thing

Would anyone be willing to do a similar analysis for final 4 teams? Wondering if some poorer defensive teams have been able to win 4 games in the NCAAT?


Uncle Rico

Quote from: SaveOD238 on January 20, 2023, 11:03:32 AM
11 of those teams have top 4 offenses.

Only 2 had top 4 defenses.

So you're telling me there's a chance??

If you look closer, all the national champs have had a top-20 defense and offense.

The exceptions are 2014 UConn and the last two national champs that were just outside the top-20 on defense.

You can make a final four with one elite side.  Winning it all is another thing.  Still, if you asked me what was more likely, a team with an elite offense and ok defense winning it all versus the other, give me the team with an elite offense
Guster is for Lovers

CountryRoads

Quote from: The Thing on January 20, 2023, 11:30:03 AM
Would anyone be willing to do a similar analysis for final 4 teams? Wondering if some poorer defensive teams have been able to win 4 games in the NCAAT?

These were the only two I found over 60 which is interesting:

2011: VCU (78)
2003: Marquette (109)

(Texas was 58 in 2003 and there were maybe 5 teams in the 40s)

The Thing

Interesting. I was wondering what MU's defensive rating was in 2003.

BLWarrior91

Our offense in 2003 was #2 and defense was #119.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: BLWarrior91 on January 20, 2023, 12:04:05 PM
Our offense in 2003 was #2 and defense was #119.

How much of that 119 was the Kansas game?   ;D

tower912

#33
Hire Mike Deane to coach defense!



Can you picture Deane pulling Kolek, Oso,or Omax 90 seconds in for giving up a lay up?
Can you picture Shaka and Nevada's expressions?   Might be worth it strictly for entertainment.   Shaka trying to build them up, Deane mf'ing them after every basket.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

ZiggysFryBoy


The Thing

Maybe Final 4 is this team's ceiling? Sign me up!


NCMUFan

Quote from: CountryRoads on January 20, 2023, 09:50:12 AM
National Champions in the Kenpom era...

Format: (offense rank, defense rank):

2022: Kansas (6, 17)
2021: Baylor (2, 22)
2019: Virginia (2, 5)
2018: Villanova (1, 11)
2017: North Carolina (9, 11)
2016: Villanova (3, 5)
2015: Duke (3, 11)
2014: Connecticut (39, 10)
2013: Louisville (7, 1)
2012: Kentucky (2, 7)
2011: Connecticut (19, 15)
2010: Duke (1, 5)
2009: North Carolina (1, 18)
2008: Kansas (2, 1)
2007: Florida (1, 13)
2006: Florida (3, 7)
2005: North Carolina (2, 5)
2004: Connecticut (9, 6)
2003: Syracuse (17, 14)
2002: Maryland (4, 7)

Considering the above, looks like there's a good chance the champion comes from this group this year:

Houston (6, 2)
UCLA (12, 5)
Alabama (13, 7)
Purdue (3, 18)
Connecticut (16, 12)
Kansas (17, 14)

Where is Marquette ranked in Defense?

NCMUFan

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on January 20, 2023, 12:15:56 PM


How much of that 119 was the Kansas game?   ;D
I thought Marquette just forfeited the Kansas game.
You are saying the team actually played?

GoldenEagles03

VIOLENCE!

avid1010

Quote from: CountryRoads on January 20, 2023, 09:50:12 AM
National Champions in the Kenpom era...

Format: (offense rank, defense rank):

2022: Kansas (6, 17)
2021: Baylor (2, 22)
2019: Virginia (2, 5)
2018: Villanova (1, 11)
2017: North Carolina (9, 11)
2016: Villanova (3, 5)
2015: Duke (3, 11)
2014: Connecticut (39, 10)
2013: Louisville (7, 1)
2012: Kentucky (2, 7)
2011: Connecticut (19, 15)
2010: Duke (1, 5)
2009: North Carolina (1, 18)
2008: Kansas (2, 1)
2007: Florida (1, 13)
2006: Florida (3, 7)
2005: North Carolina (2, 5)
2004: Connecticut (9, 6)
2003: Syracuse (17, 14)
2002: Maryland (4, 7)

Considering the above, looks like there's a good chance the champion comes from this group this year:

Houston (6, 2)
UCLA (12, 5)
Alabama (13, 7)
Purdue (3, 18)
Connecticut (16, 12)
Kansas (17, 14)

Good thing our defense isn't as good as our offense...we'd never win a championship.

ChitownSpaceForRent

And yet, they have ANOTHER game on CBS Sports Network

Whichever exec who made that decision this preseason should not have a job come next year.

BLWarrior91

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on January 20, 2023, 12:15:56 PM


How much of that 119 was the Kansas game?   ;D

Ouch!

I've tried to block that game from my memory.

lostpassword

Quote from: The Thing on January 20, 2023, 02:50:17 PM
Maybe Final 4 is this team's ceiling? Sign me up!

Co-sign. I will begrudgingly accept this outcome.

DoctorV

Quote from: CountryRoads on January 20, 2023, 12:00:17 PM
These were the only two I found over 60 which is interesting:

2011: VCU (78)
2003: Marquette (109)

(Texas was 58 in 2003 and there were maybe 5 teams in the 40s)

This is amazing.

Talk about just the most perfect bar room stat if this seasons Marquette were to shock us all.

One can only dream.

Milkshakes

Quote from: CountryRoads on January 20, 2023, 12:00:17 PM
These were the only two I found over 60 which is interesting:

2011: VCU (78)
2003: Marquette (109)

(Texas was 58 in 2003 and there were maybe 5 teams in the 40s)

Does no one else have the theme song from the Twilight Zone blaring in their head right now!?!?

brewcity77

Quote from: Heisenberg v2.0 on January 20, 2023, 07:29:51 AMDo you agree with Parrish that offense is the most important statistic and MU now #1 is a big deal?

Offense is more important than defense, but if you want to win it all you do need at least a competent defense. Typically, teams that enter the tournament top-25 in both have a real shot, and the lowest defensive rank on kenpom to enter the tournament and cut down nets was UNC at #39.

MarquetteDano

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 21, 2023, 10:02:30 AM
Offense is more important than defense, but if you want to win it all you do need at least a competent defense. Typically, teams that enter the tournament top-25 in both have a real shot, and the lowest defensive rank on kenpom to enter the tournament and cut down nets was UNC at #39.

Thanks for that Brew.  People keep on quoting champion's rank was at the end of year when they went on an incredible 6 game run.  It is more interesting to know what their rank was BEFORE the tourney.

Can I ask what was the lowest offensive rank for a champion prior to the tourney?

jfp61

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 21, 2023, 10:02:30 AM
Offense is more important than defense, but if you want to win it all you do need at least a competent defense. Typically, teams that enter the tournament top-25 in both have a real shot, and the lowest defensive rank on kenpom to enter the tournament and cut down nets was UNC at #39.

There is a mild solution to the defense at the end of the year, its called praying that Marquette can get away with playing Joplin 10 mpg come postseason time. Until then pray he learns how to play defense a tiny bit.

In conference play and with Oso on the court, Joplin's ON/ OFF is the most horrific individual defensive stats.

In conference play and with Oso ON the court and with Joplin ON the court, in 181 defensive possessions, Marquette has an adj. defensive rating of 110.7, allowing a 47.3 off. rebounding rate, a 43.6 FTR, and allowing opponents to shoot 41.0% from three while taking 39.1% of attempts from three.

In conference play and with Oso ON the court and with Joplin OFF the court, in 294 defensive possessions, Marquette has an adj. defensive rating of 87.1, allowing 30.8% an off. rebounding rate, a 21.5 FTR, and allowing opponents to shoot 22.2% from three while taking 32.3% of attempts from three.

Joplin can't play any defense, and we are one of the best offenses in the country with or without him.

The Sultan

Quote from: jfp61 on January 21, 2023, 10:32:47 AM
There is a mild solution to the defense at the end of the year, its called praying that Marquette can get away with playing Joplin 10 mpg come postseason time. Until then pray he learns how to play defense a tiny bit.

In conference play and with Oso on the court, Joplin's ON/ OFF is the most horrific individual defensive stats.

In conference play and with Oso ON the court and with Joplin ON the court, in 181 defensive possessions, Marquette has an adj. defensive rating of 110.7, allowing a 47.3 off. rebounding rate, a 43.6 FTR, and allowing opponents to shoot 41.0% from three while taking 39.1% of attempts from three.

In conference play and with Oso ON the court and with Joplin OFF the court, in 294 defensive possessions, Marquette has an adj. defensive rating of 87.1, allowing 30.8% an off. rebounding rate, a 21.5 FTR, and allowing opponents to shoot 22.2% from three while taking 32.3% of attempts from three.

Joplin can't play any defense, and we are one of the best offenses in the country with or without him.


This is why I have been hoping for more Ross in end game situations. I know he's a freshman, but it seems the defensive upside is greater than any offensive downside.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Previous topic - Next topic