collapse

* Recent Posts

Big East 2024 Offseason by MU82
[Today at 06:32:11 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by JTJ3
[Today at 06:20:57 PM]


[Paint Touches] Big East programs ranked by NBA representation by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[Today at 04:49:54 PM]


Banquet by rocky_warrior
[Today at 04:25:47 PM]


D-I Logo Quiz by SoCalEagle
[Today at 01:23:01 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Protecting the Constitution  (Read 27161 times)

pacearrow02

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #300 on: June 27, 2022, 01:03:01 PM »
And millions of idiots in the US believe that climate change isn't real.

That doesn't change the facts on the ground.

Science doesn't care about your 'opinions'.

So I you just posted previously that you believe women can be men and men can be woman and that men can have babies.  Now you’re saying science doesn’t care about someone’s opinions?

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3691
  • NA of course
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #301 on: June 27, 2022, 01:06:31 PM »
No doubt the same people celebrating this ruling would be thrilled if a Muslim coach led players in prayer at the 50-yard line.

  or if a team was putting BLM patches on the uniforms and a few decided they didn't want them on theirs?? 
don't...don't don't don't don't

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4590
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #302 on: June 27, 2022, 01:08:29 PM »
So I you just posted previously that you believe women can be men and men can be woman and that men can have babies.  Now you’re saying science doesn’t care about someone’s opinions?

Didn’t Merit post about that……..

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #303 on: June 27, 2022, 01:31:15 PM »
  or if a team was putting BLM patches on the uniforms and a few decided they didn't want them on theirs??

Google "non-sequitur."

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #304 on: June 27, 2022, 01:32:47 PM »
So I you just posted previously that you believe women can be men and men can be woman and that men can have babies.  Now you’re saying science doesn’t care about someone’s opinions?

I'll just leave this for you here.

https://apnews.com/article/politics-science-health-gender-identity-biology-2a67da6515aa48e68e56cd97817b097a

Merit Matters

  • Walk-On
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #305 on: June 27, 2022, 01:35:37 PM »
Didn’t Merit post about that……..
Indeed. Men can’t have babies. Period. Wild that has to be said.
All Lives Matter

ZiggysFryBoy

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5115
  • MEDITERRANEAN TACOS!
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #306 on: June 27, 2022, 01:49:41 PM »
I remember when chicks with dicks was a kink that hards searched for on Alta Vista.

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #307 on: June 27, 2022, 01:53:31 PM »
So I you just posted previously that you believe women can be men and men can be woman and that men can have babies.  Now you’re saying science doesn’t care about someone’s opinions?

No, I'm saying that science says that gender isn't the same as sex.  Gender is a social construct, just like race.

But you know, here I go talking to a stupid person again.

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #308 on: June 27, 2022, 01:55:35 PM »
I remember when chicks with dicks was a kink that hards searched for on Alta Vista.

I'm not conservative enough to be obsessed with trans people, sorry.

https://lawsuit.org/general-law/republicans-have-an-obsession-with-transgender-pornography/

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26465
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #309 on: June 27, 2022, 03:02:27 PM »
I can make exactly the same argument in reverse.

1) Your argument falls flat because they made a choice.

2) Are you really trying to use your family to argue my wife should be dead and my children should not exist?
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

lawdog77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2540
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #310 on: June 27, 2022, 03:09:24 PM »
1) Your argument falls flat because they made a choice.

2) Are you really trying to use your family to argue my wife should be dead and my children should not exist?
First and foremost, I am happy your wife and family are good. Second, just from reading, none of the restrictive abortion laws would ban ectopic pregnancies.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22924
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #311 on: June 27, 2022, 03:16:11 PM »
I understand the freedom to quietly pray but if you read the actual case, players testified as saying they felt compelled or risked playing time as the coach would go to the middle of the field and hold up a helmet. If you've played a team sport, you would know that's pretty much universally a sign to gather.

Anyway, the Ninth Circuit's denial of rehearing actually states that after refusing alternative accommodations to pray from the school district, he advertised in the area newspaper and local/national TV stations that he intended to defy they request.

He then proceeded to pray out loud in the middle of the field immediately after he sued the school district with making sure that local politicians and members of the media were recording the event.

Feels really icky and not in good faith (unintentional).

But I guess to quote Matthew 6:5

 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."

Or was this only all about winning as it usually is?

Superb explanation of what went on here.

The coach is an attention whore who obviously doesn't give a shyte about kids -- or he wouldn't have put them on the spot in public, all but forcing them to join the prayer circle or be labeled heathens (or worse).

I'm not the least bit surprised by the ruling, though. SCOTUS has been taken over by Christian zealots, and they're already erasing decades of progress.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

noblewarrior

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #312 on: June 27, 2022, 03:40:19 PM »
First and foremost, I am happy your wife and family are good. Second, just from reading, none of the restrictive abortion laws would ban ectopic pregnancies.

Nor do they disallow medical assistance for complications from miscarriages.  Also, very happy your family is well. 

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26465
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #313 on: June 27, 2022, 04:04:45 PM »
First and foremost, I am happy your wife and family are good. Second, just from reading, none of the restrictive abortion laws would ban ectopic pregnancies.

Not an ectopic pregnancy. We miscarried at 12 weeks which required a D&C, considered an abortive procedure.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2022, 04:27:38 PM by brewcity77 »
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #314 on: June 27, 2022, 04:07:14 PM »
These are the stone age people we are dealing with.

Republican candidate Yesli Vega:

"The left will say, 'Well, what about in cases of rape or incest?' I'm a law enforcement officer. I became a police officer in 2011. I've worked one case where as a result of a rape, the young woman became pregnant."

How does she know how many rape cases end in pregnancy simply because she's a cop? What a painfully stupid thing to say.

She was then asked, "I've actually heard that it's harder for a woman to get pregnant if she's been raped. Have you heard that?"

"Well, maybe because there's so much going on in the body," Vega said. "I don't know. I haven't, you know, seen any studies. But if I'm processing what you're saying, it wouldn't surprise me. Because it's not something that's happening organically. You're forcing it. The individual, the male, is doing it as quickly — it's not like, you know — and so I can see why there is truth to that. It's unfortunate."

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #315 on: June 27, 2022, 04:07:32 PM »
This is what Justice Neil Gorsuch described as "quiet and personal" prayer.


Plaque Lives Matter!

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #316 on: June 27, 2022, 04:12:42 PM »
I had a kid push me up against my locker and threaten to beat the crap out of me because after reading up on the war on Iraq, i was at the time not particularly thrilled with saying the pledge of allegiance. I then said it from there on out because the alternative was to catch a beating despite it being “optional”. You can say that kids have the choice not to participate in these prayer sessions but you’re fooling yourself if you think it’s not going to be enforced in the background through direct or indirect means. This just opens it up for plausible deniability if incidents like these are brought up.

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #317 on: June 27, 2022, 04:24:30 PM »
I had a kid push me up against my locker and threaten to beat the crap out of me because after reading up on the war on Iraq, i was at the time not particularly thrilled with saying the pledge of allegiance. I then said it from there on out because the alternative was to catch a beating despite it being “optional”. You can say that kids have the choice not to participate in these prayer sessions but you’re fooling yourself if you think it’s not going to be enforced in the background through direct or indirect means. This just opens it up for plausible deniability if incidents like these are brought up.

All the kids have always known, that the emperor wears no clothes.

But they bow down to him anyway, cause it's better than being alone.

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #318 on: June 27, 2022, 04:43:15 PM »
This is stupid. Abortion saved my wife's life. Her second miscarriage required a DNC, which is considered an abortion process to remove tissue from a miscarried fetus. Not a baby, which does not exist until birth and absolutely cannot survive outside the womb until 20 weeks, a fetus.

Without that abortive process, my wife would be dead and neither my daughter nor son would be alive. Our abortion didn't kill a miscarried fetus, it saved a life and allowed the creation of two more.

...exactly, it does not kill the fetus.

https://www.webmd.com/women/guide/d-and-c-dilation-and-curettage

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22924
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #319 on: June 27, 2022, 05:19:11 PM »
I had a kid push me up against my locker and threaten to beat the crap out of me because after reading up on the war on Iraq, i was at the time not particularly thrilled with saying the pledge of allegiance. I then said it from there on out because the alternative was to catch a beating despite it being “optional”. You can say that kids have the choice not to participate in these prayer sessions but you’re fooling yourself if you think it’s not going to be enforced in the background through direct or indirect means. This just opens it up for plausible deniability if incidents like these are brought up.

Sorry you went through that.

There is tremendous pressure on people to go along. Adults having to deal with it is one thing, a teenager having to deal with it is unconscionable.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #320 on: June 27, 2022, 05:41:37 PM »
...exactly, it does not kill the fetus.

https://www.webmd.com/women/guide/d-and-c-dilation-and-curettage

Degrees from Marquette in the 60s must have been dished out like candy corn on Halloween.

JWags85

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2994
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #321 on: June 27, 2022, 06:01:58 PM »
Degrees from Marquette in the 60s must have been dished out like candy corn on Halloween.

So they were thrown away cause they are a disgusting, gross excuse for a "candy"?

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #322 on: June 27, 2022, 06:07:42 PM »
So they were thrown away cause they are a disgusting, gross excuse for a "candy"?

+1

I think candy corn was popular in the 60s though.

ATL MU Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2809
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #323 on: June 27, 2022, 06:22:35 PM »
So they were thrown away cause they are a disgusting, gross excuse for a "candy"?
Truer words have never been spoken (or typed I guess)

TSmith34, Inc.

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5149
Re: Protecting the Constitution
« Reply #324 on: June 27, 2022, 06:27:12 PM »
So they were thrown away cause they are a disgusting, gross excuse for a "candy"?
There is no place here for candy corn haters, Sir!
If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.