collapse

* Recent Posts

[Paint Touches] Big East programs ranked by NBA representation by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[Today at 04:49:54 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by Viper
[Today at 04:49:52 PM]


Banquet by rocky_warrior
[Today at 04:25:47 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 04:10:23 PM]


D-I Logo Quiz by SoCalEagle
[Today at 01:23:01 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: 2024 Green Bay Packers Thread  (Read 132161 times)

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10041
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1450 on: April 26, 2023, 01:36:36 PM »
Well it kinda does because if he plays 65% but plays terrible we get a better spot. Question is if he gets benched to save the 1 if he plays like @$$.

Hopefully, he quits on the Jets like quit on the Packers last year
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22923
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1451 on: April 26, 2023, 01:39:08 PM »
From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1452 on: April 26, 2023, 01:39:48 PM »
Packers to win the North at +500 are nice odds. Definitely some Ewing Theory potential, and the division feels still pretty open.

🤔

Grabbed it

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1453 on: April 26, 2023, 01:41:00 PM »
From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.

I don't think that is at all the consensus.

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10041
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1454 on: April 26, 2023, 01:43:35 PM »
From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.

Nobody thought Rodgers was good until his game against the Cowboys on a Thursday night in 2007.  He was not good in camp, preseason or limited action his first two seasons.  He was slow and injury-prone.  It clicked for him after that.  He was good in camp and preseason in 2007.  A completely different player
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22923
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1455 on: April 26, 2023, 01:44:29 PM »
I don't think that is at all the consensus.

OK. Maybe the haters are just louder, or maybe I just haven't read the thread right.

Anyway, did you expect Rodgers to be a star after sitting on the bench for 3 years? Did you expect him to suck? Did you not know what to expect?
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1456 on: April 26, 2023, 01:53:23 PM »
OK. Maybe the haters are just louder, or maybe I just haven't read the thread right.

Anyway, did you expect Rodgers to be a star after sitting on the bench for 3 years? Did you expect him to suck? Did you not know what to expect?

I was very excited when he was drafted.  I didn't know what we had at the time, but who could have.  Brett was getting old, and you don't see a top 2 pick slide to the 20s very often unless there are major red flags.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1457 on: April 26, 2023, 02:02:05 PM »
What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11971
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1458 on: April 26, 2023, 02:33:01 PM »
Time will tell.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4590
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1459 on: April 26, 2023, 02:40:55 PM »
I was letdown at the time, but understand it. I think at that point, Rodgers’ contract was very easy to get away from over the next few years, and his performance was dropping.

I think the plan was to have Love behind him and move on for the 2022 season. Then Rodgers won MVP twice and the team had great years and the next contract was very favorable to Rodgers.

CreightonWarrior

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1460 on: April 26, 2023, 02:43:25 PM »
What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?
He's not the second coming of Mahomes YET

MUBurrow

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1461 on: April 26, 2023, 02:47:13 PM »
I was letdown at the time, but understand it. I think at that point, Rodgers’ contract was very easy to get away from over the next few years, and his performance was dropping.

I think the plan was to have Love behind him and move on for the 2022 season. Then Rodgers won MVP twice and the team had great years and the next contract was very favorable to Rodgers.

Agreed on all. Given how Rodgers has consistently shown he needs to feel disrespected to feel motivated, I think the Packers got good value from Love if he never plays a down.

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10041
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1462 on: April 26, 2023, 02:52:20 PM »
What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?

Because Rodgers wasn’t good in 2019 and was showing signs of decline.  It was his third straight sub-100 QB rating and he was going to be 37.

He was also beginning his diva song and dance BS.  He turned it around in ‘20 and ‘21 and was incredible.  The idea of drafting a QB in 2020 was no different that taking a QB in the first round in 2005
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1463 on: April 26, 2023, 03:12:29 PM »

Apparently not.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/04/26/packers-get-short-term-cap-relief-with-minor-adjustment-to-aaron-rodgerss-contract/

Rodger's dead cap hit didn't change by one cent with the "restructuring". His dead cap for Green Bay is still $40.3 million, and Green Bay will carry that entire hit for all of the 2023 season. All this move does is impact 2024, where the restructuring means the Packers won't take a hit next season. Technically speaking, GB declined the 2023 option, and all three sides agreed to a new contract that "saved" GB $14 M in 2023 (that they were probably never going to pay anyway).

Before the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $31.6 M for 2023
After the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $40.3 M for 2023, $0 thereafter
Net net: Trading Rodgers now gave GB a net -$9 M cap hit this season, nothing moving forward


Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1464 on: April 26, 2023, 03:19:51 PM »
Rodger's dead cap hit didn't change by one cent with the "restructuring". His dead cap for Green Bay is still $40.3 million, and Green Bay will carry that entire hit for all of the 2023 season. All this move does is impact 2024, where the restructuring means the Packers won't take a hit next season. Technically speaking, GB declined the 2023 option, and all three sides agreed to a new contract that "saved" GB $14 M in 2023 (that they were probably never going to pay anyway).

Before the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $31.6 M for 2023
After the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $40.3 M for 2023, $0 thereafter
Net net: Trading Rodgers now gave GB a net -$9 M cap hit this season, nothing moving forward

Yup and that is a big W

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1465 on: April 26, 2023, 03:32:11 PM »
Yup and that is a big W

It is a big win for GB for 2024, they were up against the projected ceiling for 2024 before this move. For the Jets, it'll allow them to reasonably work Rodgers in for 2024 (if he plays). The Jets real problem would be 2025/2026.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2023, 04:17:50 PM by DegenerateDish »

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11971
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1466 on: April 26, 2023, 03:50:47 PM »
OK then I am not understanding when the PFT link says this:

"The contract has a $58.3 million option bonus, which converts to base salary if not exercised by Week One. The Packers had been carrying this year’s allocation of the bonus — $14.575 million — along with his base salary for 2023. In a revision to the contract, the exercise window was shifted to erase the $14.575 million cap charge.

The alternative would have been to pick up the credit in 2024. The new deal allowed the Packers to get the benefit of the reduction now.

That reduces the cap charge from $37.4 million to $22.825 million, and it clears Rodgers from the books in 2023."
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1467 on: April 26, 2023, 04:47:02 PM »
OK then I am not understanding when the PFT link says this:

"The contract has a $58.3 million option bonus, which converts to base salary if not exercised by Week One. The Packers had been carrying this year’s allocation of the bonus — $14.575 million — along with his base salary for 2023. In a revision to the contract, the exercise window was shifted to erase the $14.575 million cap charge.

The alternative would have been to pick up the credit in 2024. The new deal allowed the Packers to get the benefit of the reduction now.

That reduces the cap charge from $37.4 million to $22.825 million, and it clears Rodgers from the books in 2023."

That’s PFT’s long winded way of saying the Packers declined to pick up his yearly $14.75 option bonus (that unless Rodgers eff’d them over, they were never going to pay anyway). It means Green Bay no longer has a commitment to that bonus going forward.


MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22923
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1468 on: April 26, 2023, 05:02:39 PM »
Rodgers said the Jets’ didn’t bring him in to be their savior.

Well, actually, they did.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1469 on: April 26, 2023, 05:59:53 PM »
Because Rodgers wasn’t good in 2019 and was showing signs of decline.  It was his third straight sub-100 QB rating and he was going to be 37.

He was also beginning his diva song and dance BS.  He turned it around in ‘20 and ‘21 and was incredible.  The idea of drafting a QB in 2020 was no different that taking a QB in the first round in 2005


Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10041
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1470 on: April 26, 2023, 06:07:23 PM »

Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?

So?  What was Josh Allen?
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1471 on: April 26, 2023, 06:08:17 PM »

Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?

Not like there were any other good QBs available to them.



tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23755
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1472 on: April 26, 2023, 06:13:42 PM »
Lamar Jackson can be had for a price.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1473 on: April 26, 2023, 06:18:28 PM »
So?  What was Josh Allen?

In his final college season, Allen threw six INTs on 270 attempts, or one per 45 attempts.
Love, in his final college season, threw 17 INTs on 293 attempts, or one per 17 attempts.

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10041
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: 2023-24 Green Bay Packers Thread
« Reply #1474 on: April 26, 2023, 06:23:33 PM »
In his final college season, Allen threw six INTs on 270 attempts, or one per 45 attempts.
Love, in his final college season, threw 17 INTs on 293 attempts, or one per 17 attempts.

Ok, bad comp, lol.  There were a lot of concerns about Allen’s completion percentage coming out and Love was really good as a sophomore with a new coach (Gary Andersen) his junior year
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

 

feedback