collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Perspective 2025 by panda2.0
[Today at 12:07:29 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by wadesworld
[Today at 09:22:55 AM]


Kam update by MuMark
[May 02, 2025, 06:12:26 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Billy Hoyle
[May 02, 2025, 05:42:02 PM]


2025 Transfer Portal by Jay Bee
[May 02, 2025, 05:06:35 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Galway Eagle
[May 02, 2025, 04:24:46 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by Tha Hound
[May 02, 2025, 09:02:34 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Uncle Rico

Quote from: CreightonWarrior on April 26, 2023, 01:18:03 PM
Well it kinda does because if he plays 65% but plays terrible we get a better spot. Question is if he gets benched to save the 1 if he plays like @$$.

Hopefully, he quits on the Jets like quit on the Packers last year
Guster is for Lovers

MU82

From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Hards Alumni

Quote from: DegenerateDish on April 25, 2023, 12:14:58 PM
Packers to win the North at +500 are nice odds. Definitely some Ewing Theory potential, and the division feels still pretty open.

🤔

Grabbed it

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MU82 on April 26, 2023, 01:39:08 PM
From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.

I don't think that is at all the consensus.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: MU82 on April 26, 2023, 01:39:08 PM
From reading Scoop, it appears that most of the GB fans here think Love's not very good. Curious how many also thought Rodgers wasn't very good back in 2006 and 2007.

Nobody thought Rodgers was good until his game against the Cowboys on a Thursday night in 2007.  He was not good in camp, preseason or limited action his first two seasons.  He was slow and injury-prone.  It clicked for him after that.  He was good in camp and preseason in 2007.  A completely different player
Guster is for Lovers

MU82

Quote from: Hards Alumni on April 26, 2023, 01:41:00 PM
I don't think that is at all the consensus.

OK. Maybe the haters are just louder, or maybe I just haven't read the thread right.

Anyway, did you expect Rodgers to be a star after sitting on the bench for 3 years? Did you expect him to suck? Did you not know what to expect?
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MU82 on April 26, 2023, 01:44:29 PM
OK. Maybe the haters are just louder, or maybe I just haven't read the thread right.

Anyway, did you expect Rodgers to be a star after sitting on the bench for 3 years? Did you expect him to suck? Did you not know what to expect?

I was very excited when he was drafted.  I didn't know what we had at the time, but who could have.  Brett was getting old, and you don't see a top 2 pick slide to the 20s very often unless there are major red flags.

4everwarriors

What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

The Sultan

"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

cheebs09

I was letdown at the time, but understand it. I think at that point, Rodgers' contract was very easy to get away from over the next few years, and his performance was dropping.

I think the plan was to have Love behind him and move on for the 2022 season. Then Rodgers won MVP twice and the team had great years and the next contract was very favorable to Rodgers.

CreightonWarrior

Quote from: 4everwarriors on April 26, 2023, 02:02:05 PM
What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?
He's not the second coming of Mahomes YET

MUBurrow

Quote from: cheebs09 on April 26, 2023, 02:40:55 PM
I was letdown at the time, but understand it. I think at that point, Rodgers' contract was very easy to get away from over the next few years, and his performance was dropping.

I think the plan was to have Love behind him and move on for the 2022 season. Then Rodgers won MVP twice and the team had great years and the next contract was very favorable to Rodgers.

Agreed on all. Given how Rodgers has consistently shown he needs to feel disrespected to feel motivated, I think the Packers got good value from Love if he never plays a down.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 4everwarriors on April 26, 2023, 02:02:05 PM
What was the rush to move up and select Love? Its not like he's the second coming of Mahomes. I'll be surprised if he's any more than pedestrian and would peddle his ass right now for a pigskin and a kickin' tee, hey?

Because Rodgers wasn't good in 2019 and was showing signs of decline.  It was his third straight sub-100 QB rating and he was going to be 37.

He was also beginning his diva song and dance BS.  He turned it around in '20 and '21 and was incredible.  The idea of drafting a QB in 2020 was no different that taking a QB in the first round in 2005
Guster is for Lovers

Dish

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on April 26, 2023, 01:18:50 PM

Apparently not.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/04/26/packers-get-short-term-cap-relief-with-minor-adjustment-to-aaron-rodgerss-contract/

Rodger's dead cap hit didn't change by one cent with the "restructuring". His dead cap for Green Bay is still $40.3 million, and Green Bay will carry that entire hit for all of the 2023 season. All this move does is impact 2024, where the restructuring means the Packers won't take a hit next season. Technically speaking, GB declined the 2023 option, and all three sides agreed to a new contract that "saved" GB $14 M in 2023 (that they were probably never going to pay anyway).

Before the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $31.6 M for 2023
After the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $40.3 M for 2023, $0 thereafter
Net net: Trading Rodgers now gave GB a net -$9 M cap hit this season, nothing moving forward


Hards Alumni

Quote from: DegenerateDish on April 26, 2023, 03:12:29 PM
Rodger's dead cap hit didn't change by one cent with the "restructuring". His dead cap for Green Bay is still $40.3 million, and Green Bay will carry that entire hit for all of the 2023 season. All this move does is impact 2024, where the restructuring means the Packers won't take a hit next season. Technically speaking, GB declined the 2023 option, and all three sides agreed to a new contract that "saved" GB $14 M in 2023 (that they were probably never going to pay anyway).

Before the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $31.6 M for 2023
After the trade: Rodgers GB cap hit $40.3 M for 2023, $0 thereafter
Net net: Trading Rodgers now gave GB a net -$9 M cap hit this season, nothing moving forward

Yup and that is a big W

Dish

#1465
Quote from: Hards Alumni on April 26, 2023, 03:19:51 PM
Yup and that is a big W

It is a big win for GB for 2024, they were up against the projected ceiling for 2024 before this move. For the Jets, it'll allow them to reasonably work Rodgers in for 2024 (if he plays). The Jets real problem would be 2025/2026.

The Sultan

OK then I am not understanding when the PFT link says this:

"The contract has a $58.3 million option bonus, which converts to base salary if not exercised by Week One. The Packers had been carrying this year's allocation of the bonus — $14.575 million — along with his base salary for 2023. In a revision to the contract, the exercise window was shifted to erase the $14.575 million cap charge.

The alternative would have been to pick up the credit in 2024. The new deal allowed the Packers to get the benefit of the reduction now.

That reduces the cap charge from $37.4 million to $22.825 million, and it clears Rodgers from the books in 2023."
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Dish

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on April 26, 2023, 03:50:47 PM
OK then I am not understanding when the PFT link says this:

"The contract has a $58.3 million option bonus, which converts to base salary if not exercised by Week One. The Packers had been carrying this year's allocation of the bonus — $14.575 million — along with his base salary for 2023. In a revision to the contract, the exercise window was shifted to erase the $14.575 million cap charge.

The alternative would have been to pick up the credit in 2024. The new deal allowed the Packers to get the benefit of the reduction now.

That reduces the cap charge from $37.4 million to $22.825 million, and it clears Rodgers from the books in 2023."

That's PFT's long winded way of saying the Packers declined to pick up his yearly $14.75 option bonus (that unless Rodgers eff'd them over, they were never going to pay anyway). It means Green Bay no longer has a commitment to that bonus going forward.


MU82

Rodgers said the Jets' didn't bring him in to be their savior.

Well, actually, they did.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

4everwarriors

Quote from: Uncle Rico on April 26, 2023, 02:52:20 PM
Because Rodgers wasn't good in 2019 and was showing signs of decline.  It was his third straight sub-100 QB rating and he was going to be 37.

He was also beginning his diva song and dance BS.  He turned it around in '20 and '21 and was incredible.  The idea of drafting a QB in 2020 was no different that taking a QB in the first round in 2005


Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Uncle Rico

Quote from: 4everwarriors on April 26, 2023, 05:59:53 PM

Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?

So?  What was Josh Allen?
Guster is for Lovers

Pakuni

Quote from: 4everwarriors on April 26, 2023, 05:59:53 PM

Fine, but why Love? Dude was nothing special and was an interception machine, aina?

Not like there were any other good QBs available to them.



tower912

Lamar Jackson can be had for a price.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Pakuni

Quote from: Uncle Rico on April 26, 2023, 06:07:23 PM
So?  What was Josh Allen?

In his final college season, Allen threw six INTs on 270 attempts, or one per 45 attempts.
Love, in his final college season, threw 17 INTs on 293 attempts, or one per 17 attempts.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: Pakuni on April 26, 2023, 06:18:28 PM
In his final college season, Allen threw six INTs on 270 attempts, or one per 45 attempts.
Love, in his final college season, threw 17 INTs on 293 attempts, or one per 17 attempts.

Ok, bad comp, lol.  There were a lot of concerns about Allen's completion percentage coming out and Love was really good as a sophomore with a new coach (Gary Andersen) his junior year
Guster is for Lovers

Previous topic - Next topic