collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by Markusquette
[Today at 08:33:29 PM]


2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[Today at 08:17:02 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by willie warrior
[Today at 08:14:38 PM]


2024 Mock Drafts by bilsu
[Today at 07:37:34 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by willie warrior
[Today at 05:36:43 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by Herman Cain
[Today at 05:04:53 PM]


NIL Future by MU82
[Today at 03:21:43 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: More conference realignment talk  (Read 325352 times)

Tyler COLEk

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 859
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2025 on: March 10, 2023, 10:32:09 AM »
Marquette joining the Big 12 would be bad from any reasonable fan’s perspective. Why would anyone want to mess with what’s happening in the Big East right now?

Obviously it would be much better than being left in the cold without a major conference affiliation. But if the Big 12 wants to package basketball media rights separate from football, who’s to say there would be much (if any) financial incentive for Big East universities to switch? Isn’t the entire appeal of moving to the P5 getting at least a tiny piece of that football pie?

Shooter McGavin

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2026 on: March 10, 2023, 10:34:33 AM »
Which could be very good (joining the Big XII) or very bad (getting left behind with Providence, DePaul, and Butler) for Marquette

Yeah, the whole Shaka is going to be here for a long time and MU will be back to Al level success could be destroyed in an instant with a couple phone calls from the Big 12.  Enjoy the success of MU and the Big East conference while it lasts.  In a couple years the Players Championship may be much more important on weekends like this by many MU fans who are only interested in competing at the highest level. Not sure I would be willing to accept being in a different version of the MCC again either. 
« Last Edit: March 10, 2023, 10:36:54 AM by Shooter McGavin »

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2027 on: March 10, 2023, 10:47:52 AM »
If the worst case happened, and Villanova, UConn and SJU left the conference, the Big East would be able to pick up 2 or 3 decent programs and move forward. It would not make Marquette irrelevant and most certainly not be the next version of the MCC.  Don't get me wrong, it would not be nearly as good as the conference is now, but have some faith.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

SaveOD238

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2028 on: March 10, 2023, 10:51:32 AM »
Marquette joining the Big 12 would be bad from any reasonable fan’s perspective. Why would anyone want to mess with what’s happening in the Big East right now?

Obviously it would be much better than being left in the cold without a major conference affiliation. But if the Big 12 wants to package basketball media rights separate from football, who’s to say there would be much (if any) financial incentive for Big East universities to switch? Isn’t the entire appeal of moving to the P5 getting at least a tiny piece of that football pie?

The Big XII has produced the last two national champions and is year in and year out the best conference in college basketball.

Sure, Kansas would win the conference every year.  But we'd be in the next tier with Baylor, Houston, etc and at the very least no worse off than Iowa St or K State.

I prefer the current Big East, but I'd much rather be IN an expanded Big XII than out of it.

Tyler COLEk

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 859
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2029 on: March 10, 2023, 11:10:10 AM »
The Big XII has produced the last two national champions and is year in and year out the best conference in college basketball.

Sure, Kansas would win the conference every year.  But we'd be in the next tier with Baylor, Houston, etc and at the very least no worse off than Iowa St or K State.

I prefer the current Big East, but I'd much rather be IN an expanded Big XII than out of it.

Of course if the Big East is majorly poached we’d want to be a part of that. But what’s incentivizing those first Big East teams to make the jump? Even if you could guarantee the Big 12’s quality long-term (which you can’t—they’ll have down years soon enough), that isn’t a good enough reason to blow up decades-long rivalries, participation in the BET, and everything else the Big East has going it.

Shooter McGavin

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2030 on: March 10, 2023, 11:11:53 AM »
If the worst case happened, and Villanova, UConn and SJU left the conference, the Big East would be able to pick up 2 or 3 decent programs and move forward. It would not make Marquette irrelevant and most certainly not be the next version of the MCC.  Don't get me wrong, it would not be nearly as good as the conference is now, but have some faith.

I think the worst case scenario leads to a slightly stronger version of the A-10.  The MCC was a little hyperbole on my part.  My concern would be the continued erosion of status that would eventually lead to a second tier in college basketball.  MU needs to be in a conference that is part of the 75-100 teams that eventually break away from the rest and have their own championship.  The movement for power conference consolidation in the last 10-15 years has been exponentially faster than the last 100 years combined. The writing is on the wall.  They will break away.  MU needs an invite from the big boys and there is concern on my part that will not happen.  Hopefully I am dead wrong. 

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2031 on: March 10, 2023, 11:15:32 AM »
I think the worst case scenario leads to a slightly stronger version of the A-10.  The MCC was a little hyperbole on my part.  My concern would be the continued erosion of status that would eventually lead to a second tier in college basketball. MU needs to be in a conference that is part of the 75-100 teams that eventually break away from the rest and have their own championship.  The movement for power conference consolidation in the last 10-15 years has been exponentially faster than the last 100 years combined. The writing is on the wall.  They will break away.  MU needs an invite from the big boys and there is concern on my part that will not happen.  Hopefully I am dead wrong.

I doubt the bolded happens. There is zero reason for the top 75-100 teams to do that now.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

CountryRoads

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2032 on: March 10, 2023, 11:34:50 AM »
Of course if the Big East is majorly poached we’d want to be a part of that. But what’s incentivizing those first Big East teams to make the jump? Even if you could guarantee the Big 12’s quality long-term (which you can’t—they’ll have down years soon enough), that isn’t a good enough reason to blow up decades-long rivalries, participation in the BET, and everything else the Big East has going it.

The Big12 isn’t an attractive spot for MU or any other BE program. It would just take one phone call from the Big10 to snag Kansas and the basketball conference would quickly become crap. The success of Baylor and Houston are largely tied to their coaches and if they leave those programs and fan bases could easily fall off a cliff. Nothing would excite me less to look at the schedule and see games @BYU and home against UCF back to back.

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6638
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2033 on: March 10, 2023, 11:39:27 AM »
The Big12 isn’t an attractive spot for MU or any other BE program. It would just take one phone call from the Big10 to snag Kansas and the basketball conference would quickly become crap. The success of Baylor and Houston are largely tied to their coaches and if they leave those programs and fan bases could easily fall off a cliff. Nothing would excite me less to look at the schedule and see games @BYU and home against UCF back to back.

A couple of things:

1.  No.
2.  Houston isn't in the Big 12.

CountryRoads

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2034 on: March 10, 2023, 11:46:27 AM »
A couple of things:

1.  No.
2.  Houston isn't in the Big 12.

They would be when any basketball only school would be a part of the conference. And  what do you mean by “no”?

There would be much more attractive options for any basketball only school than the Big12.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2035 on: March 10, 2023, 12:08:14 PM »
A couple of things:

1.  No.
2.  Houston isn't in the Big 12.

Houston will be in the B12 next year.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6638
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2036 on: March 10, 2023, 12:08:37 PM »
They would be when any basketball only school would be a part of the conference. And  what do you mean by “no”?

There would be much more attractive options for any basketball only school than the Big12.

Kansas is not the only good team in the conference was the "no".

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6638
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2037 on: March 10, 2023, 12:09:26 PM »
Houston will be in the B12 next year.

I'm getting old.

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13061
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2038 on: March 10, 2023, 12:44:57 PM »

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2039 on: March 10, 2023, 12:47:55 PM »
Actually, this July as they negotiated an early exit.

https://www.uh.edu/news-events/stories/2022-news-articles/june-2022/06102022-big12.php


I meant next academic year. I have to realize that not everyone works in higher education!
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

MU Fan in Connecticut

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2040 on: March 10, 2023, 01:44:41 PM »

John Fanta
@John_Fanta
NEWS: Big East Commissioner Val Ackerman announces that the conference will be initiating talks about a renewal deal with media rights holder FOX Sports in the coming months.

https://twitter.com/John_Fanta/status/1633523513842647040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1633523513842647040%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

79Warrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4097
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2041 on: March 10, 2023, 01:53:11 PM »
If the worst case happened, and Villanova, UConn and SJU left the conference, the Big East would be able to pick up 2 or 3 decent programs and move forward. It would not make Marquette irrelevant and most certainly not be the next version of the MCC.  Don't get me wrong, it would not be nearly as good as the conference is now, but have some faith.

If the BE loses the greater metro NY market with a Nova, UConn and SJU exit then the conference takes a big hit imo.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2042 on: March 10, 2023, 02:23:37 PM »
If the BE loses the greater metro NY market with a Nova, UConn and SJU exit then the conference takes a big hit imo.

They'd still have Seton Hall, but yeah...
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4774
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2043 on: March 10, 2023, 02:34:58 PM »
John Fanta
@John_Fanta
NEWS: Big East Commissioner Val Ackerman announces that the conference will be initiating talks about a renewal deal with media rights holder FOX Sports in the coming months.

https://twitter.com/John_Fanta/status/1633523513842647040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1633523513842647040%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

This and the fact that Fox holds the rights to B12 basketball, makes me think that a B12 raid on the BE is unlikely, and that its more likely to see some sort of B12-BE alliance hybrid for basketball (and maybe olympic sports?).

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5142
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2044 on: March 10, 2023, 02:41:48 PM »
The Big12 isn’t an attractive spot for MU or any other BE program. It would just take one phone call from the Big10 to snag Kansas and the basketball conference would quickly become crap. The success of Baylor and Houston are largely tied to their coaches and if they leave those programs and fan bases could easily fall off a cliff. Nothing would excite me less to look at the schedule and see games @BYU and home against UCF back to back.

Isn't that true for most basketball programs.

Dickthedribbler

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2045 on: March 10, 2023, 03:01:25 PM »
This and the fact that Fox holds the rights to B12 basketball, makes me think that a B12 raid on the BE is unlikely, and that its more likely to see some sort of B12-BE alliance hybrid for basketball (and maybe olympic sports?).

Forgetful:

Your citation to the Fanta announcement and your comments are the most intelligent/comforting take I've seen written on this topic in the last 2 months.

Why would FOX enter into negotiations with the Big East today regarding the renewal of its broadcasting rights, if it's going to standby and watch one of its other broadcast partners ( the B12) blow up the BE tomorrow. It's counterintuitive on a number of levels.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11911
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2046 on: March 10, 2023, 03:34:18 PM »
This and the fact that Fox holds the rights to B12 basketball, makes me think that a B12 raid on the BE is unlikely, and that its more likely to see some sort of B12-BE alliance hybrid for basketball (and maybe olympic sports?).

Makes a great deal of sense.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2047 on: March 10, 2023, 03:49:28 PM »
This and the fact that Fox holds the rights to B12 basketball, makes me think that a B12 raid on the BE is unlikely, and that its more likely to see some sort of B12-BE alliance hybrid for basketball (and maybe olympic sports?).

Hopefully they will find a better alternative to FloSports. Big 12 college baseball showdown opening weekend,  FloSports was charging $30 to watch games. Big East keeps renewing its FloSports deals too. Cost/value, production, etc…isn’t strong.


The Equalizer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1774
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2048 on: March 10, 2023, 05:20:04 PM »
Quote from: CountryRoads link=topic=62146.msg1530746#msg1530746 date=
The Big12 isn’t an attractive spot for MU or any other BE program. It would just take one phone call from the Big10 to snag Kansas and the basketball conference would quickly become crap. The success of Baylor and Houston are largely tied to their coaches and if they leave those programs and fan bases could easily fall off a cliff. Nothing would excite me less to look at the schedule and see games @BYU and home against UCF back to back.

The success of Houston is tied to Tilman Fertetta. 

Oldgym

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
  • It was their final, most essential command
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #2049 on: March 16, 2023, 12:57:31 PM »
Quote
In a wide-ranging interview with CBS Sports on Wednesday night, Robbins provided what might be the most inside look at the Pac-12-Big 12 realignment tussle to date.  Robbins said out loud what the industry has been whispering: Fox had a significant hand in luring USC and UCLA to the Big Ten. We learned that Arizona and Arizona State are basically a package deal with Robbins and ASU president Michael Crow in lockstep. If one leaves the conference, the other might follow.

Quote
No matter what happens with a Pac-12 deal, the SEC and Big Ten will be at least $30 million annually ahead of everyone else on a per-school basis. That gulf is significant and will be difficult to overcome.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/arizona-president-talks-keeping-pac-12-together-tv-deal-expectations-deadlines-big-12-interest-and-more/


 

feedback