collapse

* Stud of Colorado Game

Tyler Kolek

21 points, 5 rebounds,
11 assists, 1 steal,
40 minutes

2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by Plaque Lives Matter!
[Today at 01:02:54 AM]


45 minutes ago at the Dallas Westin by MuggsyB
[Today at 12:19:24 AM]


2024 Coaching Carousel by Plaque Lives Matter!
[Today at 12:10:57 AM]


2024 Transfer Portal by CountryRoads
[Today at 12:05:42 AM]


Are we still recruiting anyone for the 24-25 season. by Don_Kojis
[Today at 12:04:21 AM]


Where is Marquette? by marqfan22
[March 28, 2024, 09:29:52 PM]


Chicago bars for Fri game by Daniel
[March 28, 2024, 08:47:22 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: NC State

Marquette
81
Marquette vs

NC State

Date/Time: Mar 29, 2024, 6:09 pm
TV: CBS
Schedule for 2023-24
Colorado
77

Author Topic: NCAA recent investigations  (Read 121394 times)

MuMark

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4300
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #225 on: October 24, 2018, 01:56:21 PM »
So back to the topic.......verdict is in.....

https://twitter.com/petebrush/status/1055170261295816704?s=21

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #226 on: October 24, 2018, 02:02:18 PM »
If you need a dose of pain, misery, and righteous indignation, hop on any Kansas fan board. Everyone is apparently out get them and this the NCAA's revenge for them beating Duke and Kentucky fives in the last three years.
There is some very ugly stuff on their boards. If you thought Louisville or Arizona fans could be nasty; Kansas fans take it to a whole new level. Their recruits should read what their fans post; I don't think any would choose to go to Lawrence.

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #227 on: October 24, 2018, 02:49:29 PM »
Kansas President and Chancellor support Self and KU BB program

https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/1055182276152168449
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #228 on: October 24, 2018, 03:04:17 PM »
There is some very ugly stuff on their boards. If you thought Louisville or Arizona fans could be nasty; Kansas fans take it to a whole new level. Their recruits should read what their fans post; I don't think any would choose to go to Lawrence.

Kansas President and Chancellor support Self and KU BB program

https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/1055182276152168449


This is in essence why KU isn't going to change on its own.

MomofMUltiples

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #229 on: October 24, 2018, 03:24:27 PM »
Kansas President and Chancellor support Self and KU BB program

https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/1055182276152168449

Ruh-roh.  Doesn't the vote of confidence usually come right before the hatchet drops?
I mean, OK, maybe he's secretly a serial killer who's pulled the wool over our eyes with his good deeds and smooth jumper - Pakuni (on Markus Howard)

LoudMouth

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #230 on: October 24, 2018, 03:25:21 PM »
Ruh-roh.  Doesn't the vote of confidence usually come right before the hatchet drops?

Not the case with Zona last year

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #231 on: October 24, 2018, 03:29:04 PM »
If they can hold off on the punishment till the day we play them that'd be great
Maigh Eo for Sam

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26360
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #232 on: October 24, 2018, 04:00:04 PM »
If they can hold off on the punishment till the day we play them that'd be great

Any punishments will likely hold off until after the next round of trials in April.
This space reserved for a 2024 National Championship celebration banner.

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #233 on: October 24, 2018, 05:30:48 PM »

This is in essence why KU isn't going to change on its own.

While neither is a quality academic institution, KU is making UofL look like the apex of integrity and ethics. (Never thought I would ever write that)

How can a president of a university enforce punishment for academic dishonesty while allowing his own basketball coach to make a mockery of the NCAA rules? (I understand the KU is about men's basketball and not higher education but this is becoming a joke)


Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9565
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #235 on: October 24, 2018, 07:53:53 PM »
Arizona with another quality commit
https://twitter.com/terryterry25/status/1055247660905459712?s=21

Terry Armstrong
Goal is National Championship

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17384
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #236 on: October 24, 2018, 08:02:07 PM »
The cash is flying in Tucson.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • NA of course
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #237 on: October 25, 2018, 06:16:47 AM »
gotta love all the gratuitous sanctimony coming from the most probable benefactors of this stink-you can almost write the scripts for guys like self, petino, calipari, williams, et.al. 

   if this just prevents one more student athlete from going rogue and the ncaa can get back to its core values...this isn't what the ncaa is all about...it only takes a few to cast a bad image...they should take anyone who tries to ruin the system and cast us in a "bad light" and make an example of them...this is really all about the student-athlete and not where we want to go...it ruins the "spirit" of the student-athlete...let's get this all cleared up, we need transparency to bring the competition back to the fans...we will show full cooperation to get to the bottom of all this...

   blah blah blah blah
don't...don't don't don't don't

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26360
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #238 on: October 25, 2018, 07:17:53 AM »
if this just prevents one more student athlete from going rogue and the ncaa can get back to its core values...

Making billions of dollars on the backs of an unpaid/underpaid labor force?
This space reserved for a 2024 National Championship celebration banner.

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2721
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #239 on: October 25, 2018, 09:42:25 AM »
Making billions of dollars on the backs of an unpaid/underpaid labor force?
How much should the 13th player on IUPUI roster make?

Look, I get the system is not perfect but that does not justify cheating nor do I see a way, legally, to compensate college athletes. 

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #240 on: October 25, 2018, 09:43:48 AM »
How much should the 13th player on IUPUI roster make?

How ever much someone wants to pay him.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #241 on: October 25, 2018, 09:44:49 AM »
gotta love all the gratuitous sanctimony coming from the most probable benefactors of this stink-you can almost write the scripts for guys like self, petino, calipari, williams, et.al. 

   if this just prevents one more student athlete from going rogue and the ncaa can get back to its core values...this isn't what the ncaa is all about...it only takes a few to cast a bad image...they should take anyone who tries to ruin the system and cast us in a "bad light" and make an example of them...this is really all about the student-athlete and not where we want to go...it ruins the "spirit" of the student-athlete...let's get this all cleared up, we need transparency to bring the competition back to the fans...we will show full cooperation to get to the bottom of all this...

   blah blah blah blah


Let them make outside income.  It will clear up the under the table payments quickly. 

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #242 on: October 25, 2018, 10:23:59 AM »

Let them make outside income.  It will clear up the under the table payments quickly.

This. I know it'll likely hurt mid majors as top talent will transfer but I think it'll clean up the game overall.
Maigh Eo for Sam

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4728
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #243 on: October 25, 2018, 11:45:21 AM »
Making billions of dollars on the backs of an unpaid/underpaid labor force?

There always seems to be an automatic assumption that they are unpaid/underpaid.  The market says otherwise.  Many of the top prospects for next year have been interviewed about whether they would consider the G-league offer.  The majority said no, that the value of playing in the NCAA is better. 

So the actual market, says that in a competitive marketplace between the G-league, Euro-leagues, and the NCAA, the NCAA is offering the best compensation.  That means they are being compensated at the rate a competitive market place deems reasonable.


Let them make outside income.  It will clear up the under the table payments quickly. 

Not feasible.  There are all kinds of problems with such a scenario.  If you were to open them to outside income, they would be subjected to all the same conflict of interest issues that other employees (compensated individuals) at the University. 

That means any outside income would have to go under general counsel review, and could not come from any entities that have agreements with the university (donations, business contracts, etc), nor any entities that are involved in the same competitive market that entities that have agreements with the university. 

For example.  Marquette is a Nike school.  Nike directly compensating the athlete would be a conflict of interest between the athlete and Marquette, and would be disallowed for an MU employee (or compensated individual).  Alternatively, if Adidas came and wanted to compensate/endorse the athlete, it would be disallowed, because Marquette has a exclusive rights clause with Nike, and it would be constituted as a conflict of interest and be disallowed.

The only recourse to that would be to say athletes are not subject to the same rules and regulations of all other University compensated individuals, which would open massive lawsuits involving selective prosecution. 

It is not as trivial as just "opening people to outside income".

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #244 on: October 25, 2018, 12:02:30 PM »

Not feasible.  There are all kinds of problems with such a scenario.  If you were to open them to outside income, they would be subjected to all the same conflict of interest issues that other employees (compensated individuals) at the University. 

That means any outside income would have to go under general counsel review, and could not come from any entities that have agreements with the university (donations, business contracts, etc), nor any entities that are involved in the same competitive market that entities that have agreements with the university. 

For example.  Marquette is a Nike school.  Nike directly compensating the athlete would be a conflict of interest between the athlete and Marquette, and would be disallowed for an MU employee (or compensated individual).  Alternatively, if Adidas came and wanted to compensate/endorse the athlete, it would be disallowed, because Marquette has a exclusive rights clause with Nike, and it would be constituted as a conflict of interest and be disallowed.

The only recourse to that would be to say athletes are not subject to the same rules and regulations of all other University compensated individuals, which would open massive lawsuits involving selective prosecution. 

It is not as trivial as just "opening people to outside income".



Oh please.

It's completely feasible.  They're students.  Do other students under scholarship have to sign conflict of interest forms if they work off campus? 

In reality it means they'll cut a few TV spots for boosters or collect some $$ from the same shoe company that sponsors the school.  Maybe do a autograph session or two.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26360
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #245 on: October 25, 2018, 12:36:39 PM »
This. I know it'll likely hurt mid majors as top talent will transfer but I think it'll clean up the game overall.

But that already happens. I don't think it would accelerate the transfer train any more than we've already seen.
This space reserved for a 2024 National Championship celebration banner.

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6031
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #246 on: October 25, 2018, 02:33:18 PM »
There always seems to be an automatic assumption that they are unpaid/underpaid.  The market says otherwise.  Many of the top prospects for next year have been interviewed about whether they would consider the G-league offer.  The majority said no, that the value of playing in the NCAA is better. 

So the actual market, says that in a competitive marketplace between the G-league, Euro-leagues, and the NCAA, the NCAA is offering the best compensation.  That means they are being compensated at the rate a competitive market place deems reasonable.

That's not a "free market"

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • NA of course
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #247 on: October 25, 2018, 06:43:59 PM »
This. I know it'll likely hurt mid majors as top talent will transfer but I think it'll clean up the game overall.

enter the luxury tax, eyn'a?  might as well put a salary cap in there as well?

  i needed teal because there isn't a 1/2 teal :D
don't...don't don't don't don't


forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4728
Re: NCAA recent investigations
« Reply #249 on: October 25, 2018, 10:58:09 PM »

Oh please.

It's completely feasible.  They're students.  Do other students under scholarship have to sign conflict of interest forms if they work off campus? 

In reality it means they'll cut a few TV spots for boosters or collect some $$ from the same shoe company that sponsors the school.  Maybe do a autograph session or two.

Actually, students fall under the same conflict of interest agreements the moment they agree to be a student (has nothing to do with scholarship).  Any intellectual property they construct using university resources belongs to the University, and when using university resources they cannot partake in any activities without approval of the general counsel if it may represent a conflict of interest. 

It is just that the majority of students do not partake in any activities that could possibly represent a conflict of interest so it doesn't matter. 

Where it usually happens is companies (say Pepsi or red bull) that is willing to sponsor a student organized event, or a student trip, etc.  If the University has an exclusive rights agreement, the student or organization cannot accept any of the money, gear, etc.

Even if the University has say an exclusive rights agreement with Coke, the student organization cannot accept free gear, money, or product, because it represents a conflict of interest, rather they have to go through previously approved channels to acquire product.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2018, 11:00:24 PM by forgetful »