collapse

Resources

Stud of Indiana Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross2

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 07:52:48 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 07:34:01 AM]


Return of Buzz by MUDPT
[Today at 06:08:06 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by MarquetteMike1977
[November 13, 2025, 10:11:46 PM]


Trojans SOTG by MuMark
[November 13, 2025, 09:20:40 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MuggsyB
[November 13, 2025, 08:19:15 PM]


Rollin’ Rock by tower912
[November 13, 2025, 08:05:42 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Maryland

Marquette
89
Marquette vs.
Maryland
Date/Time: Nov 15, 2025, 1:00pm
TV: Peacock
Schedule for 2025-26
Little Rock
49

Mutaman


Jay Bee

Quote from: #bansultan on February 16, 2018, 06:14:36 PM

We have a former head of the FBI investigating the President's campaign, but they'll be scared off by the NCAA???

Lol.

^^^ ban dis guy
The portal is NOT closed.

Lighthouse 84

HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

Jay Bee

The portal is NOT closed.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Mutaman on February 16, 2018, 07:54:17 PM
This post pretty much sums up the internet.

You're right.  It is impossible to think something on a message board without explaining yourself in long form.

MY BAD.


Mods, Delete me please. 8/26/2020

1.   Barstool broke that news?!!!

2.  Eerily similar to Artie Piscano in "Casino":

https://youtu.be/DzC-ajqynG4

skianth16

From the Yahoo article - "If your school produced a first-round pick in the past three years, be worried."

Yikes. We had one of those didn't we?

wojoswarrior

I think the only the Ellensons got was a free ride for Wally!

warriorchick

Have some patience, FFS.

mu03eng

Quote from: wojoswarrior on February 22, 2018, 08:01:41 AM
I think the only the Ellensons got was a free ride for Wally!

And an ice cream truck
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."


fjm

Phew!

MU not listed once.

But Duke, mich state, Kentucky, witchita state, Alabama, auburn, USC are listed a few times.

For the BEast:
Creigthon, Xavier, SHU and "Villanova coaches" are listed.


PuertoRicanNightmare

Do we now know why DJ Newbill skipped town?

🏀

Diamond Stone, at the time a freshman at Maryland, received $14,303 according to the documents.


Would who have thought?

🏀

Let's say Mack is truthful here..

Only Xavier coach Chris Mack elected to release a statement. He said: "I have no relationship with Andy Miller or any of his associates. He plays no role in the recruitment of potential student athletes on Xavier's behalf. Beyond that, our staff has never created a path for him to foster a relationship with any of our student-athletes while enrolled at Xavier. Any suggestion that I or anyone on my staff utilized Andy Miller to provide even the slightest of financial benefits to a Xavier student-athlete is grossly misinformed. We are prepared to cooperate with any and all investigations at any level."


He's got nothing to do with payments, Xavier itself stayed clean. But Sumner definitely took the money, X  and Mack should still hang for it, right? No institutional control?

Uncle Rico

Quote from: PTM on February 23, 2018, 06:16:23 AM
Let's say Mack is truthful here..

Only Xavier coach Chris Mack elected to release a statement. He said: "I have no relationship with Andy Miller or any of his associates. He plays no role in the recruitment of potential student athletes on Xavier's behalf. Beyond that, our staff has never created a path for him to foster a relationship with any of our student-athletes while enrolled at Xavier. Any suggestion that I or anyone on my staff utilized Andy Miller to provide even the slightest of financial benefits to a Xavier student-athlete is grossly misinformed. We are prepared to cooperate with any and all investigations at any level."


He's got nothing to do with payments, Xavier itself stayed clean. But Sumner definitely took the money, X  and Mack should still hang for it, right? No institutional control?

If history is an indicator, the answer would be yes.  This is similar to Marcus Camby and UMass.  Given the depth of this investigation at the federal level, it could be years before the NCAA can do much about it.
Thus says the Lord of hosts: Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy to one another; do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the alien, or the poor; and do not devise evil in your hearts against one another.

mileskishnish72

Nova's Kyle Lowry is also on the list.

mu03eng

Quote from: PTM on February 23, 2018, 06:16:23 AM
Let's say Mack is truthful here..

Only Xavier coach Chris Mack elected to release a statement. He said: "I have no relationship with Andy Miller or any of his associates. He plays no role in the recruitment of potential student athletes on Xavier's behalf. Beyond that, our staff has never created a path for him to foster a relationship with any of our student-athletes while enrolled at Xavier. Any suggestion that I or anyone on my staff utilized Andy Miller to provide even the slightest of financial benefits to a Xavier student-athlete is grossly misinformed. We are prepared to cooperate with any and all investigations at any level."


He's got nothing to do with payments, Xavier itself stayed clean. But Sumner definitely took the money, X  and Mack should still hang for it, right? No institutional control?

Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but I'm not sure how any of us can reasonably expect any institution to be able to track a player and his parents financial transactions outside of the school's control. If Sumner is getting a "loan" or even harder his dad is getting a "loan" has is X supposed to know that and stop it? At some point the individuals themselves have to have agency to stay within eligibility rules. In this scenario, Sumner should be ineligible but I don't know that X has any responsibility (based on what we know).

This is just another example of why the NCAA has it all wrong when it comes to amateurism. Their model invites more corruption than it prevents, if "star players" were able to profit off the fame outside of university activities (local dealership wants them as a sponsor, etc) these types of things wouldn't matter. This is the hellscape that the NCAA created for itself and I can't wait to watch it burn.
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

🏀

Quote from: mu03eng on February 23, 2018, 07:19:58 AM
Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but I'm not sure how any of us can reasonably expect any institution to be able to track a player and his parents financial transactions outside of the school's control. If Sumner is getting a "loan" or even harder his dad is getting a "loan" has is X supposed to know that and stop it? At some point the individuals themselves have to have agency to stay within eligibility rules. In this scenario, Sumner should be ineligible but I don't know that X has any responsibility (based on what we know).

This is just another example of why the NCAA has it all wrong when it comes to amateurism. Their model invites more corruption than it prevents, if "star players" were able to profit off the fame outside of university activities (local dealership wants them as a sponsor, etc) these types of things wouldn't matter. This is the hellscape that the NCAA created for itself and I can't wait to watch it burn.

As much as I would like to see Mack hang, you word for word described by feelings on this.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Glad to see we weren't mentioned.

But color me shocked if anything meaningful will actually happen to any of these teams.

Kansas on the list. Come on down, Mr. Grimes!
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Babybluejeans

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 23, 2018, 07:33:10 AM
Glad to see we weren't mentioned.

But color me shocked if anything meaningful will actually happen to any of these teams.

Yep. The NCAA has time and again proven itself utterly toothless. I don't expect any meaningful punishment to come of this except maybe Coach K sits out an exhibition game (and whines about it). Fun!

jesmu84

Quote from: mu03eng on February 23, 2018, 07:19:58 AM
Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but I'm not sure how any of us can reasonably expect any institution to be able to track a player and his parents financial transactions outside of the school's control. If Sumner is getting a "loan" or even harder his dad is getting a "loan" has is X supposed to know that and stop it? At some point the individuals themselves have to have agency to stay within eligibility rules. In this scenario, Sumner should be ineligible but I don't know that X has any responsibility (based on what we know).

This is just another example of why the NCAA has it all wrong when it comes to amateurism. Their model invites more corruption than it prevents, if "star players" were able to profit off the fame outside of university activities (local dealership wants them as a sponsor, etc) these types of things wouldn't matter. This is the hellscape that the NCAA created for itself and I can't wait to watch it burn.

Wasn't this precedent set with Cam Newton? His dad took money. The school and Cam claimed ignorance of the event. No evidence tying school to money. The NCAA did nothing.

GGGG

This really is too big for the NCAA anyway. It's been starved by its members who really don't want vigorous enforcement.

The amateurism model is the problem. Economics always wins. Instead of fighting it, regulate meaningful compensation. A model can exist if smart people put their minds together.

Dish

Certainly an interesting read. Waiting for the DOJ bomb to drop though, which will be tantalizing to see who took plea deals and then what action will take place.

Previous topic - Next topic