collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by MU82
[May 09, 2025, 08:33:38 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by muwarrior69
[May 09, 2025, 05:02:23 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]


Pope Leo XIV by tower912
[May 08, 2025, 09:06:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[May 08, 2025, 01:47:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

MU82

Quote from: The Sultan on March 15, 2025, 01:44:19 PMNo reason for Royce to leave. There is room for both.

That's fair. A big part of Shaka's job is convincing players they can work together.

Notably, I didn't say Parham would leave. I simply said that's the kind of thing that often happens, and asked if Scoopers would be happy with such a trade.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Small Orange Soda

Quote from: MU82 on March 15, 2025, 01:50:26 PMAlso, FWIW, Freeman has been neither a shooter (.313 from 3 on only 16 attempts, .600 on FTs) nor a real "banger" (6.7 reb, 1.8 blk).

Doesn't mean he's not already a good player. Doesn't mean he won't get better at those things.  Just means he's been neither of those things in two years at a B18G school.

So he can score in the paint and doesn't rely on outside shooting, would lead our team in rebounding by a full board, and averages double what our team leader in blocks does.

bradforster

Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 15, 2025, 01:37:45 PMA few weeks ago some Iowa fans online were saying he was headed to Marquette.

Nothing more connecting the two.

He's already selected his school.  Is it MU?  I guess we'll find out soon.

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Quote from: The Sultan on March 15, 2025, 01:44:19 PMNo reason for Royce to leave. There is room for both.

I trust Shaka to navigate this situation.  If a player like Freeman comes, Ben and Royce compete at the 4, and play together when the 5 sits.  All three could play big minutes.

But I can also see MU82's scenario playing out, where a player gets disappointed and leaves.

BCHoopster

He's a center, if anything maybe Ben would leave, why are you mentioning Parham, different type of player.

Pakuni

Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 15, 2025, 02:04:05 PMI trust Shaka to navigate this situation.  If a player like Freeman comes, Ben and Royce compete at the 4, and play together when the 5 sits.  All three could play big minutes.

But I can also see MU82's scenario playing out, where a player gets disappointed and leaves.

At the end of the day, who cares? Shaka's job is to field a winning team, not make sure everyone is happy with their playing time (or unwilling to compete for playing time).

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: Pakuni on March 15, 2025, 02:33:24 PMAt the end of the day, who cares? Shaka's job is to field a winning team, not make sure everyone is happy with their playing time (or unwilling to compete for playing time).

He has done nothing but field winning teams here, and it would seem Shaka cares. He wants players to develop, he wants guys to grow here and stay here.
VIOLENCE!

willie warrior

Quote from: BCHoopster on March 15, 2025, 02:06:19 PMHe's a center, if anything maybe Ben would leave, why are you mentioning Parham, different type of player.
Right...we would not want to upset Ben, who has disappeared in many games and has already lost minutes to Parham
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Zog from Margo

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 01:42:19 PMExactly ☝️

Ideally, Parham is playing Joplin's spot next year. He's too slight for the 5 spot.

Nukem2

Quote from: Zog from Margo on March 15, 2025, 02:43:10 PMIdeally, Parham is playing Joplin's spot next year. He's too slight for the 5 spot.
Slight? Not tall enough to be consistently effective against taller mobile guys, but looks well built otherwise.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: Zog from Margo on March 15, 2025, 02:43:10 PMIdeally, Parham is playing Joplin's spot next year. He's too slight for the 5 spot.

I believe that's exactly what will happen. I believe MU82s point is that, if Shaka decides to bring in a Freeman or other solidified Center, then it pushes Ben to the 4 and keeps Royce on the bench. That blocks the development that Shaka preaches. Tough to have both. Very tough.

If it is possible, I think we'd all welcome it, it just tends not to be possible.
VIOLENCE!

BCHoopster

You want to watch Ben at the center for another year? Did you watch yesterday?

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: BCHoopster on March 15, 2025, 03:08:44 PMYou want to watch Ben at the center for another year? Did you watch yesterday?

It doesn't matter what any of us want. I'm just stating the Shaka way and that is to retain and develop.

Just because I (or others) state his philosophy, doesn't mean that's what we want or believe is best. That's just how it is.
VIOLENCE!

nyg

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 02:49:27 PMI believe that's exactly what will happen. I believe MU82s point is that, if Shaka decides to bring in a Freeman or other solidified Center, then it pushes Ben to the 4 and keeps Royce on the bench. That blocks the development that Shaka preaches. Tough to have both. Very tough.

If it is possible, I think we'd all welcome it, it just tends not to be possible.

Blocks the development?  Keeps him on the bench? Parham was on the BE all freshman team and will see significant minutes next year, significant, whether starting or coming off the bench.  Just in case a nice portal player comes onboard, doesn't necessarily means Parham will be on the "bench".  It is possible to spread those minutes and would be a blessing to the team, as opposed to now.  Heck, for all we know, Parham develops even more and takes minutes away from Gold. 

As far as the old "development" and people concerned that over recruiting players will hurt the players feelings, so be it.  Happens to every high major basketball program. Shaka is earning millions to construct a roster to win, not to be a school principal and worry about players being put in detention and having feelings hurt.

Like you said, it is tough, but so be it.  Shaka's a smart guy and probably is contemplating what direction his roster is going to be.  After their last game, he will meet with returning players and define what roles they will play. Some be happy, some not. Personally, I think two players will not return, but that speculation will be discussed in few weeks.

Pakuni

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 02:49:27 PMI believe that's exactly what will happen. I believe MU82s point is that, if Shaka decides to bring in a Freeman or other solidified Center, then it pushes Ben to the 4 and keeps Royce on the bench. That blocks the development that Shaka preaches. Tough to have both. Very tough.

If it is possible, I think we'd all welcome it, it just tends not to be possible.

If Shaka decides to bring in a Freeman or other solidified (?) center, it pushes Ben to the bench.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: nyg on March 15, 2025, 03:12:14 PMBlocks the development?  Keeps him on the bench? Parham was on the BE all freshman team and will see significant minutes next year, significant, whether starting or coming off the bench.  Just in case a nice portal player comes onboard, doesn't necessarily means Parham will be on the "bench".  It is possible to spread those minutes and would be a blessing to the team, as opposed to now.  Heck, for all we know, Parham develops even more and takes minutes away from Gold. 

As far as the old "development" and people concerned that over recruiting players will hurt the players feelings, so be it.  Happens to every high major basketball program. Shaka is earning millions to construct a roster to win, not to be a school principal and worry about players being put in detention and having feelings hurt.

Like you said, it is tough, but so be it.  Shaka's a smart guy and probably is contemplating what direction his roster is going to be.  After their last game, he will meet with returning players and define what roles they will play. Some be happy, some not. Personally, I think two players will not return, but that speculation will be discussed in few weeks.

None of us know! If we use history as a guide it would show different, but like I said. I just want to win. I trust Shaka.
VIOLENCE!

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: Pakuni on March 15, 2025, 03:16:03 PMIf Shaka decides to bring in a Freeman or other solidified (?) center, it pushes Ben to the bench.

No
VIOLENCE!

nyg

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 03:16:31 PMNone of us know! If we use history as a guide it would show different, but like I said. I just want to win. I trust Shaka.
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 03:16:31 PMNone of us know! If we use history as a guide it would show different, but like I said. I just want to win. I trust Shaka.

None of us know?, really? Then why did you even state that Parham would go to the bench?  Why did you state "development" will be blocked? 

If you are going to post statements on what your belief is, that is fine and you can back it through appropriate commentary.  But just posting for the sake of it and trowing things out there, is not really productive. Stating "I just want to win and I trust Shaka" is a sign of surrender.   

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: nyg on March 15, 2025, 03:23:45 PMNone of us know?, really? Then why did you even state that Parham would go to the bench?  Why did you state "development" will be blocked? 

If you are going to post statements on what your belief is, that is fine and you can back it through appropriate commentary.  But just posting for the sake of it and trowing things out there, is not really productive. Stating "I just want to win and I trust Shaka" is a sign of surrender.   

Come on...you think a prominent Center would sign on to come off the bench? If your answer is no, then you think adding a Center is pushing Senior Ben Gold to the bench over Parham?

Come on..
VIOLENCE!

Zog from Margo

#38569
Quote from: Nukem2 on March 15, 2025, 02:47:17 PMSlight? Not tall enough to be consistently effective against taller mobile guys, but looks well built otherwise.

Not compared to Dixon, Reed, Zuby, Sorber. Not enough junk in the trunk to defend post ups against bigs with girth.

nyg

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 03:28:10 PMCome on...you think a prominent Center would sign on to come off the bench? If your answer is no, then you think adding a Center is pushing Senior Ben Gold to the bench over Parham?

Come on..

You are a piece of cake and are all over the planet with hypothetical concepts.
First off, define "bench"?  You make it sound as if it means minimum/zero playing minutes. Its does not. 


I never, never said adding a center would push Gold to "bench".  I never said anything about a nice portal player signing to come off the bench. I said if a nice portal player comes along, it wouldn't mean Parham would go to your conceived "bench", as you wrote in your previous post. I did state that "who knows", maybe Parham will develop and maybe take some of Gold's minutes.  And I really don't care if Gold is a "senior".  Is that what a major college coach should be contemplating, because he is a senior?

We all know, you just want to win.

wadesworld

Quote from: bradforster on March 15, 2025, 01:59:32 PMHe's already selected his school.  Is it MU?  I guess we'll find out soon.

Or he has a list of schools he's interested in and doesn't need 300 schools reaching out to him.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: nyg on March 15, 2025, 03:41:18 PMYou are a piece of cake and are all over the planet with hypothetical concepts.
First off, define "bench"?  You make it sound as if it means minimum/zero playing minutes. Its does not. 


I never, never said adding a center would push Gold to "bench".  I never said anything about a nice portal player signing to come off the bench. I said if a nice portal player comes along, it wouldn't mean Parham would go to your conceived "bench", as you wrote in your previous post. I did state that "who knows", maybe Parham will develop and maybe take some of Gold's minutes.  And I really don't care if Gold is a "senior".  Is that what a major college coach should be contemplating, because he is a senior?

We all know, you just want to win.

If we add a portal Center...Parham, Gold, and said Center aren't all starting.

Which means Parham plays off the bench and his role stays the same as it was this year as the backup 4. If Shaka can convince him that is best for his development and the team, then perfect! I just don't think it's that easy.
VIOLENCE!

bradforster

Quote from: wadesworld on March 15, 2025, 03:42:13 PMOr he has a list of schools he's interested in and doesn't need 300 schools reaching out to him.

I just know he entered with a no contact designation, which usually means he's already got a school lined up.

Pakuni

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2025, 03:16:45 PMNo

Ben guarding the likes of RJ Luis, Alex Karaban and Dailyn Swain on the perimeter. Sounds fun.

Previous topic - Next topic