collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by The Sultan
[Today at 11:10:54 AM]


Pope Leo XIV by cheebs09
[Today at 10:47:28 AM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Spotcheck Billy
[May 10, 2025, 10:16:15 PM]


Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


MerrittsMustache

Quote from: muarmy81 on October 27, 2014, 12:38:35 PM
Trestman gets one more year to prove something but I agree.  Beyond the X's and O's it's evident he doesn't have control of that locker room. 

I was glad to move on from Lovie Smith but at least he had the respect of the guys in the locker room.

Agree that it was time for Lovie to go but the Trestman hire was the wrong one. Not saying he's a bad coach necessarily, but he wasn't the right fit for an on-the-verge-but-window's-closing team.

In Lovie's last 3 seasons, the Bears went 11-5, 8-8 (1-5 w/o Cutler) and 10-6. They really weren't THAT far away from being contenders. While I'm normally opposed to tired coaching retreads, the Bears were in perfect position to bring in an established, well-respected coach who could potentially take them to that next level. Instead, they went with a career assistant who hadn't coached in the NFL since 2004. I would have loved to see what a guy like Andy Reid or Bruce Arians could have done with this team. I guess we'll have to wait and see what Jim Harbaugh can do starting next season.

MU B2002

Quote from: MUDish on October 27, 2014, 01:58:59 PM
I don't have confidence that Trestman can lead this team out of the downward spiral. I don't believe the locker room respects him as an authority figure. On offense, Cutler is their leader (however you want to view that) and on defense, their leader Tillman is done, and Briggs is mentally checked out. It's a bad mix of some strong personalities who do not get along with one another, and a lack of faith in coaching to lead them out of this. I don't know where this team mentally goes from here, but I don't think it's going to be pretty.

As for the Lions, the couple of things they have going for them are their conference record (5-1) and a game in hand with the Pack. Lions actually have the most conference wins of any NFC team currently. Interesting 3 game stretch coming up for them, followed by 4 very winnable games, and then the Pack in the finale.

Do you think Tucker survives?  I can't tell if he is a bad D coach, or simply a victim of a tired bunch of Def players.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

ChicosBailBonds


Dish

Quote from: MU B2ellenson2 on October 27, 2014, 02:01:12 PM
Do you think Tucker survives?  I can't tell if he is a bad D coach, or simply a victim of a tired bunch of Def players.

This is just my guess, but Trestman and Emery probably survive the season. The sword will have to fall on someone, and it'll probably be Tucker and DeCamillis. I'm not saying I think Trestman should survive the season if they finish something like 4-12, but just knowing the organization, I think both those guys survive.

Herein lies the problem...they're contractually and from a roster management standpoint, they're stuck in hell right now. The Cutler contract in and of itself isn't bad, it's market value. The problem is if you truly want to start over, you have to bottom out completely, and you have too many positions of need, too many above 30 players, and a coach who can't seem to manage.

Terrible drafting for years has been catching up with the Bears, and now it's really in their face.

ChitownSpaceForRent

If they go 6-10 you have to get rid of Trestman. Would love to see Gruden coach the Bears. I said it last year that I wasn't a fan of the Trestman hire. I'm not gonna lie and say I wasn't excited about the offense last year but how much is that really due to trestman and how much of that can be attributed to how well the offensivery line played and Alshons break out season.

GGGG

Quote from: ChitownEllenson on October 27, 2014, 03:25:48 PM
If they go 6-10 you have to get rid of Trestman. Would love to see Gruden coach the Bears. I said it last year that I wasn't a fan of the Trestman hire. I'm not gonna lie and say I wasn't excited about the offense last year but how much is that really due to trestman and how much of that can be attributed to how well the offensivery line played and Alshons break out season.

The Bears biggest issue is the GM.  If you can't draft well in today's NFL, you just can't win.  The problem with someone like Gruden is that he is likely going to want to have more say in personnel than you want.  I thought Emery was going to be good, but he has had A LOT of draft misses.

That is what needs to be fixed first and foremost.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on October 27, 2014, 03:30:43 PM
The Bears biggest issue is the GM.  If you can't draft well in today's NFL, you just can't win.  The problem with someone like Gruden is that he is likely going to want to have more say in personnel than you want.  I thought Emery was going to be good, but he has had A LOT of draft misses.

That is what needs to be fixed first and foremost.

I wouldnt put all of the bad draft picks on Emery. In fact, Alshon, Mills, Long, and even McClellin (granted not first roud worthy) have been good to this point. Also, I wasnt a fan of Fuller but he has been good. Hes a rookie corner which is probably one of the most difficult positions to adjust to in the NFL. Even Ego and Sutton havent been awful and I still have hope for Vereen and Wilson. Angelo REALLY screwed the Bears in the draft. Forte is the only pick that is still relevant, at least that I can remember.

Granted all that being said, Emery hasnt been immune to questionable moves but thats nothing compared to Angelo. I dont see the Bears getting rid of Trestman either just for stability sake and to avoid an "I told you so" by Bears fans but its been a rough ride.

Dish

Mills and Shea are not good, Mills is an ok backup, but if neither was on the roster next season, I'd be more than fine with it.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: MUDish on October 27, 2014, 04:17:17 PM
Mills and Shea are not good, Mills is an ok backup, but if neither was on the roster next season, I'd be more than fine with it.

I have very few quarrels with Mills. Late round pick, still young and wayyyy better than Carimi and Williams combined.

Dish

Quote from: ChitownEllenson on October 27, 2014, 04:24:27 PM
I have very few quarrels with Mills. Late round pick, still young and wayyyy better than Carimi and Williams combined.

We might be watching different things, but Mills has been really bad the last few weeks.

Just because Mills is better than Carimi and Williams...doesn't mean he's good. Bad is still bad.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: MUDish on October 27, 2014, 04:41:28 PM
We might be watching different things, but Mills has been really bad the last few weeks.

Just because Mills is better than Carimi and Williams...doesn't mean he's good. Bad is still bad.

Few weeks as opposed to the past year and a half. With all of the injuries to the line this year, teams can send multiple guys at Mills because they know they can be successful with one on ones to the backups on the line.

jesmu84

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on October 27, 2014, 03:30:43 PM
The Bears biggest issue is the GM.  If you can't draft well in today's NFL, you just can't win.  The problem with someone like Gruden is that he is likely going to want to have more say in personnel than you want.  I thought Emery was going to be good, but he has had A LOT of draft misses.

That is what needs to be fixed first and foremost.

The problems with the team and draft go back to Angelo. So do we actually know trestman and emery are bad? What if they are good at their jobs, but were put in an unstable situation. Do you fire them now (too quick imo) or give them aachance to prove themselves?

wadesworld

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on October 27, 2014, 01:46:33 PM
They could win 2 playoff games (i.e. lose in NFC Champ Game) but you don't consider them a SB contender? That's a very specific ceiling you have for the Lions  ;)


Uhh, yes. Did anyone ever really believe the Bears were SB contenders the year the Packers won it? I didn't, but they were in the NFC Championship game.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: Dillard's World on October 27, 2014, 06:14:01 PM
Uhh, yes. Did anyone ever really believe the Bears were SB contenders the year the Packers won it? I didn't, but they were in the NFC Championship game.

Well that's because you just hate everything bears and will never give them credit for anything.

GGGG

Quote from: Dillard's World on October 27, 2014, 06:14:01 PM
Uhh, yes. Did anyone ever really believe the Bears were SB contenders the year the Packers won it? I didn't, but they were in the NFC Championship game.


Of course they were Super Bowl contenders.  They lost at home in the NFC Championship Game.  Second best record in the conference.

Blackhat

 Cutler hasn't been seeing the field real well. 
Also hasn't put advantageous balls up for Jeffrey or Marshall (although being on Revis island doesn't help).

Bears and Packers defense are atrocious.   Welcome (again) to our world.    Our d won't get fixed until we get a new S&C coach and someone who can gauge talent better.   So frustrating we can't surround the best qb in the league with a competent defense going on a decade now.

GGGG

Quote from: Stone Cold on October 27, 2014, 07:42:58 PM
Cutler hasn't been seeing the field real well.  
Also hasn't put advantageous balls up for Jeffrey or Marshall (although being on Revis island doesn't help).

Bears and Packers defense are atrocious.   Welcome (again) to our world.    Our d won't get fixed until we get a new S&C coach and someone who can gauge talent better.   So frustrating we can't surround the best qb in the league with a competent defense going on a decade now.

How many teams would replace their current GM with Ted Thompson if given the option?  Maybe all but four or five?  He is routinely near the top of NFL GM rankings. (#2 by Sporting News earlier this year.)

Blackhat

Not sure for what at this point beside riding the Rodger's wave.  Nailed it on the Rodgers pick but besides that it seems to me he has failed to complement the best player in the league.   

I've seen enough of our defense over the years to realize TT can't fix it.  Looking at it realistically, TT will probably ride out the Rodgers success, and won't be touchable.  I will have to live with only imagining how good we could be. 

In a perfect world you hire Jim Harbaugh, I'd even be willing to give him personnel discretion. Unfortunately only 1 championship with the Michael Jordan of the NFL seems to sit ok with most.   

GGGG

LOL, so you would hire a volatile head coach who hasn't won a Super Bowl to be your general manager, even though he isn't the GM where he is now, to replace your current Super Bowl winning GM?  OK...

Aaron Rodgers isn't Michael Jordon and the NFL isn't the NBA.  It is insanely more difficult to win the Super Bowl due to parity.  Do you know how many current NFL GMs have won multiple Super Bowls?  I count three.  Belicheck, Newsome and Jerry Jones.  Belicheck has had the shortest tenure of the three BTW.  There are only three others who have won one Super Bowl besides Thompson.  Loomis, Reese and Schnieder.

Thompson is a very good general manager.

GGGG

Put it this way.  Ron Wolf is worshiped around Green Bay.  He is in the Packers Hall of Fame and a finalist for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

And he won as many Super Bowls as Ted Thompson.  With the previous version of "Michael Jordan." 

Blackhat

Guess we'll have to agree to disagree as they say.  There's no denying most will blindly follow TT after 2010.  I've seen Harbaugh put together great defense and o line play as well as having a top notch S&C program.   With him we could be a dynasty.  TT hasn't exactly been a wizard in the drafting/personnel department. 

Dish

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on October 27, 2014, 08:06:37 PM
How many teams would replace their current GM with Ted Thompson if given the option?  Maybe all but four or five?  He is routinely near the top of NFL GM rankings. (#2 by Sporting News earlier this year.)

<<<Hand Raised>>>

Dish

That did not look good for Romo.

Pokes are in a really tough spot here. They really could use a very very fast diagnosis because the trade deadline is hours away. They have about $4 mil in cap space available.

Ironically, their best option is probably sitting on the bench opposite them tonight.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: MUDish on October 27, 2014, 09:28:20 PM
That did not look good for Romo.

Pokes are in a really tough spot here. They really could use a very very fast diagnosis because the trade deadline is hours away. They have about $4 mil in cap space available.

Ironically, their best option is probably sitting on the bench opposite them tonight.

Cutler is free next weekend...

Dish

The other ironic thing is losing Romo is only going to increase Murray's workload.

If Romo is hurt, that's a huge loss.

Previous topic - Next topic