collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Uncle Rico
[Today at 09:53:36 AM]


NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 05:18:20 AM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]


ESPN's Way Too Early Poll by BM1090
[May 04, 2025, 11:52:59 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 04, 2025, 04:23:25 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 22, 2019, 03:41:01 PM
They should really get rid of the margin (capped or uncapped) altogether. Since margin is baked into efficiency, they are essentially giving bonus points for margin up to 10.

I think that is in there to discourage running up the score.  Math wise it makes no sense.  Purely PR.

MUMountin

Quote from: Lazar's Headband on February 22, 2019, 03:46:28 PM
The NET has 5 components.  Efficiency is component 2, (capped) scoring margin is component 5.  I am talking about component 1: team value index.

This component is an algorithm based on opponent,  location, and result.  Yes, it is a total mystery what exactly the "opponent" factor is, but this is where I think the quantity of Q4 games matter.  Again, since the NET formula and weighting is unknown, it's just my guess.  Hopefully this better explains my thought process.

This was my understanding as well. 

dgies9156

Just run the table and none of this will matter!!!!!!!!!!!!   ;D

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Lazar's Headband on February 22, 2019, 03:46:28 PM
The NET has 5 components.  Efficiency is component 2, (capped) scoring margin is component 5.  I am talking about component 1: team value index.

This component is an algorithm based on opponent,  location, and result.  Yes, it is a total mystery what exactly the "opponent" factor is, but this is where I think the quantity of Q4 games matter.  Again, since the NET formula and weighting is unknown, it's just my guess.  Hopefully this better explains my thought process.

Interesting, I understood component 1 differently, but after doing some research you are correct. When they talked about result I assumed that result wasn't just W/L but would include margin.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Herman Cain

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 22, 2019, 04:22:57 PM
Interesting, I understood component 1 differently, but after doing some research you are correct. When they talked about result I assumed that result wasn't just W/L but would include margin.
My gut instinct is that your gut instinct on NET  and the cupcake blow out factor is correct.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

MUfanatic45



CountryRoads

#2332
Quote from: Marquette4life on February 23, 2019, 01:46:17 PM
could LSU jump us?

Lost at Florida this week so it would be a joke if so. Speaking of that game, I'm not very impressed with Tennessee's resume. I think we are closer to passing them than it may seem.

BM1090

Quote from: Marquette4life on February 23, 2019, 01:46:17 PM
could LSU jump us?

Only if voters don't penalize them for losing to Florida at home.

Marquette4life

Quote from: MUeagle1090 on February 23, 2019, 01:49:24 PM
Only if voters don't penalize them for losing to Florida at home.
kind of forgot about this lol thx

brewcity77

Quote from: AirPunch on February 23, 2019, 01:49:08 PM
Lost at Florida this week so it would be a joke if so. Speaking of that game, I'm not very impressed with Tennessee's resume. I think we are closer to passing them than it may seem.

Agreed completely. After the Tennessee loss to Kentucky I looked closer at their resume and it's not that great. Both them and Michigan State look passable.

SoCalEagle

As Brew says, Tennessee lost.

Either Michigan or Michigan State will lose tomorrow. 

Would be great to see either Houston or Nevada lose tonight. Not likely, but could happen.

CountryRoads

Quote from: SoCalEagle on February 23, 2019, 05:02:02 PM
As Brew says, Tennessee lost.

Either Michigan or Michigan State will lose tomorrow. 

Would be great to see either Houston or Nevada lose tonight. Not likely, but could happen.

MU will be ranked ahead of Nevada for sure. They lost this week. My question is (and this may be a strong take) but ... should Nevada start sweating if they lose tonight? I'm pretty sure they have not played a Quad 1 game all season. That is actually difficult to do.

MuMark

Quote from: AirPunch on February 23, 2019, 05:11:11 PM
MU will be ranked ahead of Nevada for sure. They lost this week. My question is (and this may be a strong take) but ... should Nevada start sweating if they lose tonight? I'm pretty sure they have not played a Quad 1 game all season. That is actually difficult to do.

No they shouldn't...... remember the committee had them as the 14th best team on the S curve only 2 weeks ago......they've lost 1 game since then......and the bubble has only gotten worse.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/ncaa-tournament-bracket-preview-committee-puts-duke-as-top-overall-seed-tennessee-virginia-gonzaga-also-no-1s/

brewcity77

Quote from: AirPunch on February 23, 2019, 05:11:11 PM
MU will be ranked ahead of Nevada for sure. They lost this week. My question is (and this may be a strong take) but ... should Nevada start sweating if they lose tonight? I'm pretty sure they have not played a Quad 1 game all season. That is actually difficult to do.

They won't be on the bubble, but a protected seed could be a tough ask. Probably a 5/6 right now and any more losses could have them staring down a 1/2 seed as soon as the first weekend.

MUfanatic45

Quote from: AirPunch on February 23, 2019, 05:11:11 PM
MU will be ranked ahead of Nevada for sure. They lost this week. My question is (and this may be a strong take) but ... should Nevada start sweating if they lose tonight? I'm pretty sure they have not played a Quad 1 game all season. That is actually difficult to do.

They won't sweat the bubble but they might really close to being a 7 seed.

Carl

Holy crap.  If this keeps up I'd wager Texas Tech jumps us

Johnny B

When is the last time kansas lost by 30 or more

brewcity77

Good one in Reno. Fresno State leads at Nevada. 62-60 with under 5 to play.

Ellenson Guerrero

I can't tell if we should be rooting for Nevada or against them. It's be nice to jump them in the poll, but I don't want us to get sent out west again.
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

forgetful

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 23, 2019, 08:58:24 PM
Good one in Reno. Fresno State leads at Nevada. 62-60 with under 5 to play.

I fully expect for us to see them in the 2nd round. Either as a 4-5 matchup with the story line (us both being seeded too low), or as a 3-6 matchup (with the story line of Nevada being closer to a 3 seed than a 6 seed).

CountryRoads

Quote from: forgetful on February 23, 2019, 09:42:22 PM
I fully expect for us to see them in the 2nd round. Either as a 4-5 matchup with the story line (us both being seeded too low), or as a 3-6 matchup (with the story line of Nevada being closer to a 3 seed than a 6 seed).


...in San Jose lol

Johnny B

Quote from: forgetful on February 23, 2019, 09:42:22 PM
I fully expect for us to see them in the 2nd round. Either as a 4-5 matchup with the story line (us both being seeded too low), or as a 3-6 matchup (with the story line of Nevada being closer to a 3 seed than a 6 seed).
That is silly to expect. Could it happen? Sure.. but quite unlikely that match up takes place. I think they grab a 5 seed. And very low chance we end up in the same chunk of raw bracket anyways.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Carl on February 23, 2019, 07:52:01 PM
Holy crap.  If this keeps up I'd wager Texas Tech jumps us

I'd be surprised. Beating Kansas by 30 is more impressive than beatdowns of Butler and at Providence, but I don't think more impressive enough to over come the 264 vote gap between us and them.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


JakeBarnes

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 23, 2019, 10:21:39 PM
I'd be surprised. Beating Kansas by 30 is more impressive than beatdowns of Butler and at Providence, but I don't think more impressive enough to over come the 264 vote gap between us and them.

This. Gotta do more than that.
Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.

"We all carry within us our places of exile, our crimes and our ravages. But our task is not to unleash them on the world; it is to fight them in ourselves and in others." -Camus, The Rebel

Previous topic - Next topic