collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 Coaching Carousel by lawdog77
[Today at 02:11:28 PM]


NIL Future by Hards Alumni
[Today at 02:10:10 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by JakeBarnes
[Today at 02:08:34 PM]


2024 Mock Drafts by Uncle Rico
[Today at 12:50:35 PM]


2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by warriorchick
[Today at 12:06:20 PM]


MU Gear by Pepe Sylvia
[Today at 11:45:12 AM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by MU82
[Today at 11:11:25 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Poll

What does Shaka need to get done in Year 2 for you to remain a Ya-ka?

Serious BE or NCAA success - Top 3, BET title or S16 or better
13 (6.3%)
Just win a f'in NCAA game
62 (29.8%)
Make the Dance
68 (32.7%)
.500 BE Season, NIT
36 (17.3%)
Don't lose to any of the cupcakes.
3 (1.4%)
Results don't matter. Trust the Process.
17 (8.2%)
Arby's
9 (4.3%)

Total Members Voted: 208

Author Topic: Shaka Year 2  (Read 10151 times)

Elonsmusk

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #50 on: November 10, 2022, 08:02:55 AM »
I hope you are right, but the jury is still out on that one. No one will be happier than me to see the program heading in the right direction.

You should listen to all of Shaka's interviews/press conferences.  Then go back and listen to some of Wojo's.  If the difference in the "this guy has it" quotient isn't clear to you, well, don't know what to tell you.  Panda hit it right on the head with his post:

I think there’s a significantly different  trajectory with Shaka as the coach opposed to Wojo. Don’t lump the tenures together.

MUfan12

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5638
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #51 on: November 10, 2022, 08:45:34 AM »
At the very least, there's a plan and identity he's trying to build. Wojo scrambled when the Duke model didn't work here.

Will it work? I sure as hell hope so. I do think he needs to find more physicality in the frontcourt for it to really take off.

panda

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #52 on: November 10, 2022, 08:53:31 AM »
At the very least, there's a plan and identity he's trying to build. Wojo scrambled when the Duke model didn't work here.

Will it work? I sure as hell hope so. I do think he needs to find more physicality in the frontcourt for it to really take off.

I do like the recruit and retain model he has in place IF players stay which by all accounts they did at VCU/Texas and so far here as well. BUT, if we want to compete year in/year out, we need to get some front court portal wins, bringing in big guys. The bigs were recruiting will take a couple years to develop and I believe we’ll have more success long term finding a manny bates or Warren Washington type in the portal.

withoutbias

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 798
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #53 on: November 10, 2022, 09:02:43 AM »
The idea that you can turn on some press conference and determine if a coach has "it" or not is so, so funny.

Go listen to a Bill Bellichick or Coach K interview.  Some of the greatest coaches to ever coach sports.

Then there are tons of coaches with charisma who stink at coaching.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23686
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #54 on: November 10, 2022, 09:39:31 AM »
I do like the recruit and retain model he has in place IF players stay which by all accounts they did at VCU/Texas and so far here as well. BUT, if we want to compete year in/year out, we need to get some front court portal wins, bringing in big guys. The bigs were recruiting will take a couple years to develop and I believe we’ll have more success long term finding a manny bates or Warren Washington type in the portal.
To do that in the next couple of years will require multiple players to leave.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Viper

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2412
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #55 on: November 10, 2022, 09:47:22 AM »
I wish I was as optimistic as most of you on here.

I think this is going to be a rough year with no post season. I don't think MU upgraded their roster like most other Big East teams did and our non-conference is not a cakewalk.

I'll root hard each game but not expecting much this year.
I tend to agree. I hope MU wins the Ft Myers tourney with strong play, reps well vs Baylor and beats RED, but the final 6:30 of the Radford game has me worried we’ll see a lot more of THAT in conference play.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10020
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #56 on: November 10, 2022, 09:53:15 AM »
The idea that you can turn on some press conference and determine if a coach has "it" or not is so, so funny.

Go listen to a Bill Bellichick or Coach K interview.  Some of the greatest coaches to ever coach sports.

Then there are tons of coaches with charisma who stink at coaching.

Yep.
Nick Sirianni had the worst introductory press conference in the history of introductory press conferences. Turns out he's OK at coaching.
I do think Shaka is a far better coach than Wojo, but their respective press conference skills are irrelevant,

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23686
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #57 on: November 10, 2022, 09:55:09 AM »
The idea that you can turn on some press conference and determine if a coach has "it" or not is so, so funny.

Go listen to a Bill Bellichick or Coach K interview.  Some of the greatest coaches to ever coach sports.

Then there are tons of coaches with charisma who stink at coaching.
Dan Campbell had a heck of an introductory press conference.

Shaka may have better press conferences,  but Wojo kicked butt with his powerpoint.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

RushmoreAcademy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1387
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #58 on: November 10, 2022, 09:55:40 AM »
They also don’t play in a vacuum. We’ve seen much stronger BEasts before.

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13061
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #59 on: November 10, 2022, 09:59:34 AM »
Yep.
Nick Sirianni had the worst introductory press conference in the history of introductory press conferences. Turns out he's OK at coaching.
I do think Shaka is a far better coach than Wojo, but their respective press conference skills are irrelevant,

While obviously results matter, so does recruiting and marketing the program/university and selling tickets. Wojo was Melba toast and Shaka has a brand. These are also important criteria, especially for a basketball only school.

Goose

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10561
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #60 on: November 10, 2022, 10:06:40 AM »
Time will tell if Shaka can make MU basketball into a winning brand, but Shaka the person has already proven to me that he is someone that I am proud is representing MU basketball and MU in general.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23686
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #61 on: November 10, 2022, 10:13:26 AM »
I enjoy him, too.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22877
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #62 on: November 10, 2022, 10:52:17 AM »
The idea that you can turn on some press conference and determine if a coach has "it" or not is so, so funny.

Go listen to a Bill Bellichick or Coach K interview.  Some of the greatest coaches to ever coach sports.

Then there are tons of coaches with charisma who stink at coaching.

True. But most of those horrible-but-charismatic coaches haven't been to a Final Four and made numerous NCAAT appearances with three different schools, including most recently one that far exceeded expectations.

As is the case with just about all P6 basketball coaches, Shaka ultimately will be judged at Marquette by how much he wins in March, so we'll see whether he will recruit and coach well enough to do that.

But he obviously has the ability to relate to today's athletes while also getting high effort out of them. So those of us who prefer to be optimistic rather than sh!tting on everything are excited about the program's potential under Shaka Smart.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10020
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #63 on: November 10, 2022, 11:28:32 AM »
While obviously results matter, so does recruiting and marketing the program/university and selling tickets. Wojo was Melba toast and Shaka has a brand. These are also important criteria, especially for a basketball only school.

If Marquette and/or Shaka are counting on press conference skills as important factors in recruiting and brand-building, both are doomed.
The only time anyone outside the bubble notices a press conference is when it's a trainwreck (see: Nick Sirianni) or the coach loses his damn mind (see: Mike Gundy). There are no casual fans or recruits rushing over to the Marquette YouTube channel to check out Shaka's postgame comments on Radford.

The reality is, we're a bunch of doofuses on the far outside looking in, and so we grasp on to the silly, largely irrelevant stuff we're allowed to see (press conferences, timeout huddles, postgame lockerroom celebrations, slaps of five) and make a big deal about them, because it's all we got.

Elonsmusk

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #64 on: November 10, 2022, 11:55:41 AM »
The idea that you can turn on some press conference and determine if a coach has "it" or not is so, so funny.

Go listen to a Bill Bellichick or Coach K interview.  Some of the greatest coaches to ever coach sports.

Then there are tons of coaches with charisma who stink at coaching.

On the surface, you make a good point.  However, there is quite a difference between the current college basketball recruiting dynamics, and those in 1980 when Coach K started building his brand at Duke.  Also, at the pro level of course, the GMs and coaches have full control over who they draft and retain?  College basketball recruiting?  The kids have all the leverage. 

At a school like Marquette, you need a coach with charisma, charm, vision, intellect.  Shaka has all 4.  And he arrived at MU with a Final Four on his resume and a lot of NCAA appearances, albeit, not much NCAA success in the recent past. 

The point Panda made was valid - We can't conflate the struggles of the Wojo era with how things will go with Shaka.

Elonsmusk

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #65 on: November 10, 2022, 11:59:22 AM »
If Marquette and/or Shaka are counting on press conference skills as important factors in recruiting and brand-building, both are doomed.
The only time anyone outside the bubble notices a press conference is when it's a trainwreck (see: Nick Sirianni) or the coach loses his damn mind (see: Mike Gundy). There are no casual fans or recruits rushing over to the Marquette YouTube channel to check out Shaka's postgame comments on Radford.

The reality is, we're a bunch of doofuses on the far outside looking in, and so we grasp on to the silly, largely irrelevant stuff we're allowed to see (press conferences, timeout huddles, postgame lockerroom celebrations, slaps of five) and make a big deal about them, because it's all we got.

The value of the press conference to assess a coach's chops is that it gives us a look into how he will come off in the homes of recruits.  I don't expect kids to watch YouTube press conferences, yet wouldn't put it past the parents of recruits considering coming to MU or any other school - to see how the coach conducts himself.

Shaka comes off as thoughtful, sharp, likable, sincere - which I assume translates in the home of recruits too.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17529
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #66 on: November 10, 2022, 12:08:43 PM »
The value of the press conference to assess a coach's chops is that it gives us a look into how he will come off in the homes of recruits.  I don't expect kids to watch YouTube press conferences, yet wouldn't put it past the parents of recruits considering coming to MU or any other school - to see how the coach conducts himself.

Shaka comes off as thoughtful, sharp, likable, sincere - which I assume translates in the home of recruits too.

Wojo's recruiting wasn't the issue.  He pulled in higher ranked talent than what Shaka is pulling in.  So the boring press conferences didn't seem to give much indication as to how Wojo would be in a recruit's living room.

Sean Miller seems boring.  He find$ way$ to lure in recruit$ anyway$.  Rick Barnes pretty boring.  Greg Gard pretty boring.  Tony Bennett.  Dana Altman.  Mark Few.
 Bob Huggins.  Bill Self.  They're all over the place.  You don't have to win the press conference to win recruiting battles.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

Goose

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10561
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #67 on: November 10, 2022, 12:15:49 PM »
If you do not already know that Shaka is a big time recruiter, you have not been following college basketball for the past decade plus. Now, while some on here (myself included) are hoping we recruit some 4-5 stars down the road, it seems that every kid that did announce MU highlighted Shaka the person as part of the reason for coming to MU. I have zero doubt that Shaka is an elite recruiter, and it is in large part due to his personality and how he relates to younger players.

My earlier post on Shaka had nothing to do with how the kind of person he is will translate into on court success. I was pointing out that I think he is a grand slam hire off the court for MU. I have yet to meet a person that does not speak highly of Shaka as a person.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22877
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #68 on: November 10, 2022, 12:26:35 PM »
Shaka's past recruiting wins mean nothing now. The top recruits he was able to get for Texas ... he won't get most of them now. And we need him to get better recruits for Marquette than he did at VCU. Plus, it's a different world now than just 2 years ago, let alone 10 years ago.

For example, I am thrilled Shaka is our coach, yet I am disappointed he wasn't able to bring in a transfer who could back up Oso. It's OK to say that IMHO -- I want us to be great!

I don't give a darn about whether or not he "wins the press conference." But I do like a guy who can relate to today's kids while also getting the most out of them, and by all accounts that appears to be the case with Shaka. If one wants to call that "charisma" or some other word ... whatevs, he seems to have it.

Now, whether or not all of the above will translate into consistent winning -- and for me that means NCAAT appearances and March runs -- we'll see!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Goose

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10561
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #69 on: November 10, 2022, 12:57:01 PM »
82

I strongly disagree on your comments on recruiting and past results. To me, recruiting is picking the guys you think are right for the program and winning that recruiting battle. I'll take our chances on Shaka winning the battle and time will tell if he is targeting the right guys.

I will add, if past recruiting means nothing, why was he hired? If he was hired because of FF 10+ years ago I think the powers at MU need to dig a bit deeper into a guy's resume. Aside from Shaka being a great guy, past recruiting would be very high on reasons why he was hired.

5DollarPitcher

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1694
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #70 on: November 10, 2022, 01:05:43 PM »
This particular core (Kam, Stevie, Kolek, OMax, Joplin, Oso, Gold) has huge potential(Elite Eight or Final Four with a transfer or two) if they all stick around 1-2 years.  We don't have a Markus Howard, but the team (and coach) is better than anything we've seen during the Wojo years.  I WISH WISH WISH JLew would've stuck around (and he probably does too).

Winning an NCAA game this year would be a big stepping stone and should be the expectation.  Trajectory has also been concerning the last several years going back to Wojo.  I expect to see the team peaking in February and March rather than November.

Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9574
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #71 on: November 10, 2022, 01:46:43 PM »
If Marquette and/or Shaka are counting on press conference skills as important factors in recruiting and brand-building, both are doomed.
The only time anyone outside the bubble notices a press conference is when it's a trainwreck (see: Nick Sirianni) or the coach loses his damn mind (see: Mike Gundy). There are no casual fans or recruits rushing over to the Marquette YouTube channel to check out Shaka's postgame comments on Radford.

The reality is, we're a bunch of doofuses on the far outside looking in, and so we grasp on to the silly, largely irrelevant stuff we're allowed to see (press conferences, timeout huddles, postgame lockerroom celebrations, slaps of five) and make a big deal about them, because it's all we got.
I feel insulted
Goal is National Championship

GoldenEagles03

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3736
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #72 on: November 10, 2022, 01:49:56 PM »
This particular core (Kam, Stevie, Kolek, OMax, Joplin, Oso, Gold) has huge potential(Elite Eight or Final Four with a transfer or two) if they all stick around 1-2 years.  We don't have a Markus Howard, but the team (and coach) is better than anything we've seen during the Wojo years.  I WISH WISH WISH JLew would've stuck around (and he probably does too).

Winning an NCAA game this year would be a big stepping stone and should be the expectation.  Trajectory has also been concerning the last several years going back to Wojo.  I expect to see the team peaking in February and March rather than November.

This outcome for Justin is far better than him coming back and tearing his ACL in the Summer before playing year 3 at Marquette.

At least this way he can say he went with his heart. No regrets.
VIOLENCE!

5DollarPitcher

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1694
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #73 on: November 10, 2022, 02:28:32 PM »
This outcome for Justin is far better than him coming back and tearing his ACL in the Summer before playing year 3 at Marquette.

At least this way he can say he went with his heart. No regrets.
Butterfly effect. He’s sadly never in the gym where he tears his ACL if he stays put. I’m not discrediting the decision it’s just crapty the way it all worked out.

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13788
Re: Shaka Year 2
« Reply #74 on: November 10, 2022, 02:35:07 PM »
This outcome for Justin is far better than him coming back and tearing his ACL in the Summer before playing year 3 at Marquette.

At least this way he can say he went with his heart. No regrets.

I am not saying Justin made a bad decision in any way. There are still a lot of factors for him.

But its ludicrous to imply he tears his acl if he stays.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

 

feedback