collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 9/15/24 by MuMark
[Today at 08:08:12 PM]


[Cracked Sidewalks] Purdue Preview by muwarrior69
[Today at 08:02:28 PM]


Wow!!! by warriorchick
[Today at 06:21:55 PM]


Starting line ups/rotations 24-25 by tower912
[Today at 05:40:36 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: B&G Scrimmage

Marquette
Marquette

B&G Scrimmage

Date/Time: Oct 5, 2024 11:00am
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: More conference realignment talk  (Read 465850 times)

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23254
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3500 on: August 27, 2024, 02:30:06 PM »
If the back-to-back national champion with six titles and football is struggling to get an invite, I doubt there is serious interest from any power conference in any of the other Big East teams.

Well, it would have to be for an entirely different format using entirely different reasoning and economics.

They, the B10 or the SEC would only add Big East schools if they were going to form a non-football division within the conference - almost the way the Big East was proposing to do it before the Catholic 7 said buh-bye.

So you've got one division with the current programs in the Football Division, and then the likes of Marquette, Nova, Creighton, Gonzaga, Xavier, St. John's, etc, in the Non-Football Division.

For basketball, there would be crossover play throughout the season, with one champion being crowned at the conference tournament.

The NF schools would receive a smaller piece of the pie than F schools, and everybody would know that going in.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.” - George Washington

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17736
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3501 on: August 27, 2024, 02:37:26 PM »
Big 12 contract ends the same year as BE - 2031. Very interesting....

And Uconn would be added at the start of the 2032 season - the same year as the new B12 contract.

Thanks.  So where the big money is (football), the Big Twelve would not have another piece in the pie to split the Fox contract with.  So I'm not sure how big of a hinderance that is in making this a possibility.  Plus I assume that when UCONN does fully enter the B12, they will not receive equal money to the rest of the members of the B12 right away.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9387
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3502 on: August 27, 2024, 03:15:54 PM »
Well, it would have to be for an entirely different format using entirely different reasoning and economics.

They, the B10 or the SEC would only add Big East schools if they were going to form a non-football division within the conference - almost the way the Big East was proposing to do it before the Catholic 7 said buh-bye.

So you've got one division with the current programs in the Football Division, and then the likes of Marquette, Nova, Creighton, Gonzaga, Xavier, St. John's, etc, in the Non-Football Division.

For basketball, there would be crossover play throughout the season, with one champion being crowned at the conference tournament.

The NF schools would receive a smaller piece of the pie than F schools, and everybody would know that going in.

Maybe when the Big Ten steals some ACC schools they will name their divisions the Pac 12, Big 10, and ACC.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22339
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3503 on: August 27, 2024, 03:20:34 PM »
IDK. I just don't think schools will drop football for a variety of reasons. If the ACC becomes a glorified G5 conference, I think most of them keep the sport.

But you are right...who really knows.

To be clear,  I think if the ACC becomes a glorified G5 conference,  they would keep football. What I'm saying is that I could see a world where the G5 doesnt exist and the ACC is a glorified FCS conference.  That's when I could see schools dropping football
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12582
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3504 on: August 27, 2024, 05:01:44 PM »
Big 12 contract ends the same year as BE - 2031. Very interesting....

And Uconn would be added at the start of the 2032 season - the same year as the new B12 contract.

Everything is ending around that time (except for ACC) because that’s when the NCAA contract ends.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9387
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3505 on: August 31, 2024, 03:41:39 PM »
Nice to see UConn football keep it within 7 touchdowns today.  Big 12 must be licking their chops.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13035
  • 9-9-9
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3506 on: August 31, 2024, 04:24:15 PM »
NM Wrong Thread
« Last Edit: August 31, 2024, 05:18:55 PM by Herman Cain »
“It was a Great Day until it wasn’t”
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23254
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3507 on: September 04, 2024, 11:20:41 AM »
Nice to see UConn football keep it within 7 touchdowns today.  Big 12 must be licking their chops.

The Athletic has UConn ranked #131 (out of 134 teams).
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.” - George Washington

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12582
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3508 on: September 04, 2024, 11:25:42 AM »
To be fair, UConn is a great example of why schools stick with football programs. Despite being one of the worst programs in the sport, it hasn't impacted the success of their other programs, AND hasn't kept them out of the conversation for P4 conference membership.

OTOH, Idaho ending their quixotic attempt at becoming an FBS program, dropped back down to FCS, and has a top 10 program.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2971
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3509 on: September 04, 2024, 12:07:38 PM »
To be fair, UConn is a great example of why schools stick with football programs. Despite being one of the worst programs in the sport, it hasn't impacted the success of their other programs, AND hasn't kept them out of the conversation for P4 conference membership.

OTOH, Idaho ending their quixotic attempt at becoming an FBS program, dropped back down to FCS, and has a top 10 program.
The Vandals sure put a scare into the Ducks last week. They look to be a better team than UCONN.

That said, I agree with your points.

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9387
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3510 on: September 04, 2024, 01:01:36 PM »
To be fair, UConn is a great example of why schools stick with football programs. Despite being one of the worst programs in the sport, it hasn't impacted the success of their other programs, AND hasn't kept them out of the conversation for P4 conference membership.

Doesn’t their athletic department lose about $50M each year though?

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12582
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3511 on: September 04, 2024, 01:16:32 PM »
Doesn’t their athletic department lose about $50M each year though?

Almost every athletic department across the country loses money. Most schools don't view them as stand-alone business entities.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

MU Fan in Connecticut

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3490
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3512 on: September 04, 2024, 02:12:26 PM »
Doesn’t their athletic department lose about $50M each year though?

Not exactly.  They were loosing $40something mil with like the $13mil of Kevin Ollie buyout money rolled in, but it's significantly less now but still large.

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9387
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3513 on: September 04, 2024, 02:23:08 PM »
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/35468085/uconn-athletics-deficit-climbed-53-million-2022

If I am reading this article correctly, it got to $53M in 2022 ($13.4M of which was Ollie) after being $47M without Ollie in 2021.

It does sound like they knocked $7M off though if you discount Ollie's money.

MUbiz

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3514 on: September 04, 2024, 02:24:27 PM »
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/35468085/uconn-athletics-deficit-climbed-53-million-2022

If I am reading this article correctly, it got to $53M in 2022 ($13.4M of which was Ollie) after being $47M without Ollie in 2021.

It does sound like they knocked $7M off though if you discount Ollie's money.

They would still run a deficit if they were granted full membership in B12.

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2971
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3515 on: September 04, 2024, 03:23:25 PM »
They would still run a deficit if they were granted full membership in B12.
True, but is would be a big help as the Big12 distributed (from all revenues) about $55M to members last year under their old TV deal.

MUbiz

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3516 on: September 04, 2024, 04:37:30 PM »
True, but is would be a big help as the Big12 distributed (from all revenues) about $55M to members last year under their old TV deal.

That's fair - but the spend of the football program will go way up to stay up to B12 standards. I also read that West Virginias travel budget went up 10 million per year when they joined the B12. UConn's will go up by that and even more.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2024, 04:40:17 PM by MUbiz »

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4783
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3517 on: September 04, 2024, 10:16:08 PM »
To be fair, UConn is a great example of why schools stick with football programs. Despite being one of the worst programs in the sport, it hasn't impacted the success of their other programs, AND hasn't kept them out of the conversation for P4 conference membership.

OTOH, Idaho ending their quixotic attempt at becoming an FBS program, dropped back down to FCS, and has a top 10 program.

I'm not sure how this is a "great example of why schools stick with football programs."

The football program brings them no attention. They would have just as much benefit, in terms of publicity, student recruitment, without Football, except they would save $30-50M per year.

It's a better example of how Universities will throw away massive amounts of money to avoid upsetting a handful of donors.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12582
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3518 on: September 05, 2024, 05:07:46 AM »
I'm not sure how this is a "great example of why schools stick with football programs."

The football program brings them no attention. They would have just as much benefit, in terms of publicity, student recruitment, without Football, except they would save $30-50M per year.

It's a better example of how Universities will throw away massive amounts of money to avoid upsetting a handful of donors.

I’m not saying it’s a wise investment. Just an example of why schools don’t want to give it up.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2971
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3519 on: September 05, 2024, 07:53:40 AM »
That's fair - but the spend of the football program will go way up to stay up to B12 standards. I also read that West Virginias travel budget went up 10 million per year when they joined the B12. UConn's will go up by that and even more.
Agreed. I think that is the reason the presidents are opposed, right now, to UCONN's invitation. The B12 $ will not be a panacea.

Maybe Yormark is serious about UCONN, but I wouldn't rule out his desire to just rattle cages, specifically the ACC's. I'd guess the ACC would take UCONN if/when they have defections, but Yormark wants them to sweat about UCONN's availability. Maybe he wants the ACC to add another not so great member to really push FSU's and Clemson's buttons. Yormark has proven himself to be pretty good at this stuff already.

MUbiz

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3520 on: September 05, 2024, 07:58:26 AM »
Agreed. I think that is the reason the presidents are opposed, right now, to UCONN's invitation. The B12 $ will not be a panacea.

Maybe Yormark is serious about UCONN, but I wouldn't rule out his desire to just rattle cages, specifically the ACC's. I'd guess the ACC would take UCONN if/when they have defections, but Yormark wants them to sweat about UCONN's availability. Maybe he wants the ACC to add another not so great member to really push FSU's and Clemson's buttons. Yormark has proven himself to be pretty good at this stuff already.

I do not see why you would add UConn in Basketball only and then admit football 7 years later. There will be many more schools around that 2031-2032 time frame that are more attractive than UConn looking to find a home.

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2971
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3521 on: September 05, 2024, 08:04:27 AM »
I do not see why you would add UConn in Basketball only and then admit football 7 years later. There will be many more schools around that 2031-2032 time frame that are more attractive than UConn looking to find a home.
It is a head scratcher for sure. I can't imagine the non-football compensation is much different than that the Big East, but I guess it is a 'foot in the door" play much like SMU to the ACC. Alas, I don't think anything will come of it in the foreseeable future.

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9387
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3522 on: September 05, 2024, 08:06:47 AM »
Agreed. I think that is the reason the presidents are opposed, right now, to UCONN's invitation. The B12 $ will not be a panacea.

Maybe Yormark is serious about UCONN, but I wouldn't rule out his desire to just rattle cages, specifically the ACC's. I'd guess the ACC would take UCONN if/when they have defections, but Yormark wants them to sweat about UCONN's availability. Maybe he wants the ACC to add another not so great member to really push FSU's and Clemson's buttons. Yormark has proven himself to be pretty good at this stuff already.

My ideal scenario is UConn leaves for the ACC.  The Big East collects UConn's exit fee and tournament credits.

The ACC either folds or loses members becoming on par with the AAC.

UConn rejoins the Big East.  The Big East collects UConn's entrance fee.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2024, 08:22:14 AM by TallTitan34 »

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12582
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3523 on: September 05, 2024, 08:10:22 AM »
Yormark has been good at getting a media deal done and picking up the pieces when the P12 broke apart, but the rest will be hard. They have a 18 team conference with some additions who, while they made sense at the time, aren't really great programs - Cincinnati and Houston? Meh.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2971
Re: More conference realignment talk
« Reply #3524 on: September 05, 2024, 08:32:27 AM »
Yormark has been good at getting a media deal done and picking up the pieces when the P12 broke apart, but the rest will be hard. They have a 18 team conference with some additions who, while they made sense at the time, aren't really great programs - Cincinnati and Houston? Meh.
Excluding the SEC and B10, has anyone done it better than Yormark and the Big12?

I think the Cincy and UH additions were as much about TV sets as competitive football teams. Not suggesting those schools are number 1 in the markets (Cincy is OSU, Huston is TAM?) but like UCF (who may have potential) brings TV audiences.

Overall I agree, in hindsight I think he may have jumped the gun on some of those additions in light of the ACC's situation.