collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 05:18:20 AM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]


ESPN's Way Too Early Poll by BM1090
[May 04, 2025, 11:52:59 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 04, 2025, 04:23:25 PM]


Perspective 2025 by Jay Bee
[May 04, 2025, 03:26:55 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


wardle2wade

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 13, 2013, 12:13:32 PM
Bears fans create terrible arguments.  Do you know what a strawman argument is?  Clearly you don't.

They were easily-inferred conclusions based off what was said. 

Also I love the Packers-Bears rivalry... my opinions are from living in Wisc for a decade and having many Packer-fan friends for the last 15 years.  I know how unlikeable Cutler seems for anyone who is not a Bears fan, but I think it's misguided to indict him as a qb. 

Do I know if it's worth it sign Cutler with all these defensive problems?  I have no idea yet, but I'm sure it'll all play out.  It's ignorant define him as an interception-throwing dime-a-dozen qb who is not worth investing with.  If the Bears can somehow negotiate a favorable contract, the Bears would be dumb not to sign him.  Imo, there are too many other suitors for the Bears to get it done though.

akmarq

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 13, 2013, 12:13:32 PM
Bears fans create terrible arguments.  Do you know what a strawman argument is?  Clearly you don't.

Both Packers and Bears fans are football fans. That makes them both insufferable and illogical. If your sentence takes the structure "____ fans are _____", it's probably going to have a pretty bad conclusion.

Maybe Jacksonville fans are exempt from this. They are just drunk and/or sad.

wadesworld

Quote from: akmarq on December 13, 2013, 12:50:09 PM
Both Packers and Bears fans are football fans. That makes them both insufferable and illogical. If your sentence takes the structure "____ fans are _____", it's probably going to have a pretty bad conclusion.

Maybe Jacksonville fans are exempt from this. They are just drunk and/or sad.

All 2 of them!

wadesworld

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 09, 2013, 04:11:01 PM
What's the scoop on Rodgers for Dallas...I assume he is playing?  I'm in my fantasy super bowl unless Marshall scores like 4 TD's tonight, and I've been riding Rodgers on the pine the last 4 weeks.  Any skinny?

Start your other guy.

Grow a pair Rodgers (and/or doctor/McCarthy/front office).

brandx

Quote from: wadesworld on December 13, 2013, 12:55:26 PM
Start your other guy.

Grow a pair Rodgers (and/or doctor/McCarthy/front office).

Rodgers has nothing to say about the decision. Broken bones are different from strains, pulls, etc. It has nothing to do with pain. A simple density scan determines if he can play or not. It is not Rodger's decision. It is not McCarthy's decision. The doctor decides - no one else.

brandx

#1530
Quote from: wardle2wade on December 13, 2013, 12:20:41 PM
As much as I loved the undersized (now-broken) Johnny Knox, he'd play volleyball and tip it to the defense... Hester's poor route-running alone cost a handful of picks.  Can't remember the exact stat, but between the two of them the Bears had the most unforced INT's in the NFL for a couple seasons.  It's pretty crazy to think how much it's changed now by having both Marshall and the maturing Alshon.

Sounds good until you look at Brady's receivers the last couple years. Julian Edelman is his #1 guy this year. There is no #2 or #3. Whoever gets put in those spots ends up getting benched.

Cutler is what he is - a little bit above average - near the top of the middle tier of QBs in the league. Top 10 - 15 and in a QB starved league that still translates to $15 mil a year. With all of their other needs (entire Defense with Tillman and Jennings FA's and Peppers no longer worth the big money) can they pay that much for a guy who isn't a difference maker at QB?

jesmu84

Quote from: brandx on December 13, 2013, 02:29:25 PM
Sounds good until you look at Brady's receivers the last couple years. Julian Edelman is his #1 guy this year. There is no #2 or #3. Whoever gets put in those spots ends up getting benched.

I don't think you can say "last couple years" in regards to Brady. He had welker the last couple years. And brink and hernandez. When it was just Edelman, and the other crap receivers, you really saw how much different it was - Brady getting mad and yelling at everyone not to mention throwing incompletions and picks.

muarmy81

Quote from: brandx on December 13, 2013, 02:26:29 PM
Rodgers has nothing to say about the decision. Broken bones are different from strains, pulls, etc. It has nothing to do with pain. A simple density scan determines if he can play or not. It is not Rodger's decision. It is not McCarthy's decision. The doctor decides - no one else.

They didn't do a scan today when making the decision. It was an odd press conference with MCarthy. When asked if the decision was made due to medical concerns, ie the DR didn't clear him, mike jumped in the guy. "Don't get in a word battle with me". Basically said Rodgers isn't playing and that's it. Not really sure who's call it was to sit him.

wadesworld

Quote from: muarmy81 on December 13, 2013, 02:53:44 PM
They didn't do a scan today when making the decision. It was an odd press conference with MCarthy. When asked if the decision was made due to medical concerns, ie the DR didn't clear him, mike jumped in the guy. "Don't get in a word battle with me". Basically said Rodgers isn't playing and that's it. Not really sure who's call it was to sit him.

Agreed.  I doubt it's Rodgers's, but I also doubt it's just the doctor's.

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: muarmy81 on December 13, 2013, 02:53:44 PM
They didn't do a scan today when making the decision.

He had a scan yesterday.

MU B2002

Quote from: akmarq on December 13, 2013, 12:50:09 PM

Maybe Jacksonville fans are exempt from this. They are just drunk and/or sad.



Watch it now, that's the hottest team in the AFC you are talking about.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: wadesworld on December 13, 2013, 12:55:26 PM
Start your other guy.

Grow a pair Rodgers (and/or doctor/McCarthy/front office).

Yeah, I did.  Problem is I have a bunch of Packers receivers, too.  Grrr. 

muarmy81


GGGG

Quote from: wadesworld on December 13, 2013, 03:21:35 PM
Agreed.  I doubt it's Rodgers's, but I also doubt it's just the doctor's.


So what is your theory?  That Rodgers could push the issue but he didn't really want to?

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: muarmy81 on December 14, 2013, 01:30:02 PM
Then why wasn't he ruled out on the 12th?

You really don't know? When was the Cowboys last practice? This stuff is not complicated.

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: wadesworld on December 13, 2013, 03:21:35 PM
Agreed.  I doubt it's Rodgers's, but I also doubt it's just the doctor's.

He had a scan Thursday, and was not cleared to play.

muarmy81

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on December 14, 2013, 01:54:19 PM
He had a scan Thursday, and was not cleared to play.

...then he practices Friday and is ruled out the same day, sounds like he was still feeling pain.

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: muarmy81 on December 14, 2013, 02:14:40 PM
...then he practices Friday and is ruled out the same day, sounds like he was still feeling pain.

Not sure what about a scan that didn't come back clean is hard to understand. Flynn took the first team reps, and Rodgers did nothing but some throwing on Friday.

Hards Alumni


Dish


wadesworld

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 15, 2013, 12:55:47 PM
Same old Jay

Loves to turn the ball over. I would take a much physically less gifted quarterback who values the football over Jay. Turnovers are death in the NFL, and nobody turns it over better than Jay Cutler.

McCown >>> Cutler

And yes I realize Cutler's physical tools >>> McCown's physical tools.

Please resign him. And please play him against the Pack.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MUDish on December 15, 2013, 01:06:53 PM
How so? He clearly can't follow through off the ankle.

Because he isn't running the system.  He i playing hurt, and hurting his team.  Making bad throws and bad decisions.

I'm not sure how this is arguable.

Dish

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 15, 2013, 01:08:33 PM
Because he isn't running the system.  He i playing hurt, and hurting his team.  Making bad throws and bad decisions.

I'm not sure how this is arguable.

It's completely arguable. If the coaching staff decided to play him hurt. If he's not 100%, hard to argue "same 'ol".

jesmu84

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on December 15, 2013, 01:08:33 PM
Because he isn't running the system.  He i playing hurt, and hurting his team.  Making bad throws and bad decisions.

I'm not sure how this is arguable.

So the "same old jay" is one who is physically unable to make throws?

I'll be the first one to say Cutler shouldn't be playing today. And I want to see mccown soon. But jay isn't making the mental mistakes today - that would be "same old jay"

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: wadesworld on December 15, 2013, 01:07:21 PM
Loves to turn the ball over. I would take a much physically less gifted quarterback who values the football over Jay. Turnovers are death in the NFL, and nobody turns it over better than Jay Cutler.

McCown >>> Cutler

And yes I realize Cutler's physical tools >>> McCown's physical tools.

Please resign him. And please play him against the Pack.

Just stop. Youre not a Bears fan and youre just being obnoxious. I dont comment on Packers personel decisions.

Previous topic - Next topic