collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 05:18:20 AM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]


ESPN's Way Too Early Poll by BM1090
[May 04, 2025, 11:52:59 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 04, 2025, 04:23:25 PM]


Perspective 2025 by Jay Bee
[May 04, 2025, 03:26:55 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

TAMU, Knower of Ball

1. UConn
2. Purdue
3. Houston
4. Arizona
5. Marquette
6. Kansas
7. North Carolina
8. Tennessee
9. Duke
10. Iowa State
11. South Carolina
12. Auburn
13. Baylor
14. Illinois
15. Virginia
16. Alabama
17. Kentucky
18. Saint Mary's
19. Creighton
20. Indiana State
21. BYU
22. Dayton
23. Colorado State
24. Clemson
25. Wisconsin
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


HowardsWorld

I would really like to know the love affair with Arizona. They beat literally no one and play in the worst conference in basketball

El Guerrero 2

Quote from: HowardsWorld on February 11, 2024, 05:44:41 AM
I would really like to know the love affair with Arizona. They beat literally no one and play in the worst conference in basketball

I don't think they're top 5 either but to be fair they beat Duke at Cameron and beat the piss out of Wisky and MSU. Thats more than no one.

wisblue

#6153
I don't care much about the voted polls that get all of the publicity, but pay much more attention to the NCAA seed lists issued by respected bracketologists.

I'm looking forward to Saturday's release by the NCAA to see if the bracketologists have been accurately anticipating the NCAA's evaluation of the top teams.

But, to say that Arizona hasn't beaten anyone is refuted by the fact that they are 7-3 in quad one games.

Only UConn and Purdue with 8 have more Quad 1 wins, and Houston is the only other team with 7. That is a big reason why those teams are considered the current front runners for the 1 seeds.

The only teams with 6 are Kansas, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, which explains why the Badgers are still very comfortably in the NCAA field despite their recent losing streak (probably around a 5 seed).

Unlike the voted polls, NCAA selections do not have a significant recency bias.

All that being said, I expect MU to be either 6 or 7 in the AP and Coaches polls behind UConn, Purdue, Houston, Arizona, Notth Carolina, and maybe Kansas (whose loss to KSU is muted by their recent wins over Houston and Baylor).

I don't think NC deserves to be rated that high, but I don't see them falling all the way from 3 to out of the top 5. IMHO they were overrated in those polls at 3, and that isn't likely to be corrected because of one Monday loss.


willie warrior

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 06:47:57 AM
I don't care much about the voted polls that get all of the publicity, but pay much more attention to the NCAA seed lists issued by respected bracketologists.

I'm looking forward to Saturday's release by the NCAA to see if the bracketologists have been accurately anticipating the NCAA's evaluation of the top teams.

But, to say that Arizona hasn't beaten anyone is refuted by the fact that they are 7-3 in quad one games.

Only UConn and Purdue with 8 have more Quad 1 wins, and Houston is the only other team with 7. That is a big reason why those teams are considered the current front runners for the 1 seeds.

The only teams with 6 are Kansas, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, which explains why the Badgers are still very comfortably in the NCAA field despite their recent losing streak (probably around a 5 seed).

Unlike the voted polls, NCAA selections do not have a significant recency bias.

All that being said, I expect MU to be either 6 or 7 in the AP and Coaches polls behind UConn, Purdue, Houston, Arizona, Notth Carolina, and maybe Kansas (whose loss to KSU is muted by their recent wins over Houston and Baylor).

I don't think NC deserves to be rated that high, but I don't see them falling all the way from 3 to out of the top 5. IMHO they were overrated in those polls at 3, and that isn't likely to be corrected because of one Monday loss.
NC like Duke always gets the ACC bias.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

1SE

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 06:47:57 AM
I don't care much about the voted polls that get all of the publicity, but pay much more attention to the NCAA seed lists issued by respected bracketologists.

I'm looking forward to Saturday's release by the NCAA to see if the bracketologists have been accurately anticipating the NCAA's evaluation of the top teams.

But, to say that Arizona hasn't beaten anyone is refuted by the fact that they are 7-3 in quad one games.

Only UConn and Purdue with 8 have more Quad 1 wins, and Houston is the only other team with 7. That is a big reason why those teams are considered the current front runners for the 1 seeds.

The only teams with 6 are Kansas, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, which explains why the Badgers are still very comfortably in the NCAA field despite their recent losing streak (probably around a 5 seed).

Unlike the voted polls, NCAA selections do not have a significant recency bias.

All that being said, I expect MU to be either 6 or 7 in the AP and Coaches polls behind UConn, Purdue, Houston, Arizona, Notth Carolina, and maybe Kansas (whose loss to KSU is muted by their recent wins over Houston and Baylor).

I don't think NC deserves to be rated that high, but I don't see them falling all the way from 3 to out of the top 5. IMHO they were overrated in those polls at 3, and that isn't likely to be corrected because of one Monday loss.

We should definitely be ahead of UNC and KU. They both now have 5 losses. UNC has lost 2 of its last 4 including to an unranked team at home. KU's road loss not as bad, but we've won 7 straight. And if we're 5/6 you'd have to think the head-to-head of 2 5-loss teams would matter for pollsters.
Real Warriors Demand Excellence

wisblue

Quote from: willie warrior on February 11, 2024, 08:13:35 AM
NC like Duke always gets the ACC bias.

I think all of the blue bloods like Kansas, Arizona, Kentucky, et al get preferential treatment from voters.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: willie warrior on February 11, 2024, 08:13:35 AM
NC like Duke always gets the ACC bias.

Heckuva game from Jop, Gold and Mitchell yesterday.  Surprised Shaka keeps playing them
Guster is for Lovers

wisblue

Quote from: 1SE on February 11, 2024, 08:15:57 AM
We should definitely be ahead of UNC and KU. They both now have 5 losses. UNC has lost 2 of its last 4 including to an unranked team at home. KU's road loss not as bad, but we've won 7 straight. And if we're 5/6 you'd have to think the head-to-head of 2 5-loss teams would matter for pollsters.

You're putting in the recency factor that the NCAA generally ignores.

wisblue

Quote from: Uncle Rico on February 11, 2024, 08:40:25 AM
Heckuva game from Jop, Gold and Mitchell yesterday.  Surprised Shaka keeps playing them

Seems like the wrong thread for these words of wisdom.

WhiteTrash

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 08:39:25 AM
I think all of the blue bloods like Kansas, Arizona, Kentucky, et al get preferential treatment from voters.
Agreed.

Arizona is weird. By an reasonable definition, Arizona is not really close to being a blue blood. I suppose if your definition of blue blood has about 15 schools, I'd put AZ there.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 08:43:49 AM
Seems like the wrong thread for these words of wisdom.

Those 3 players have kept us from number 1 because Shaka played them in losses
Guster is for Lovers

mugrad_89

Quote from: Uncle Rico on February 11, 2024, 08:47:07 AM
Those 3 players have kept us from number 1 because Shaka played them in losses

He really should be giving the walk-ons more playing time.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: mugrad_89 on February 11, 2024, 09:49:41 AM
He really should be giving the walk-ons more playing time.

I like what I've seen out of Jonah Lucas
Guster is for Lovers

mugrad_89

Quote from: Uncle Rico on February 11, 2024, 09:51:14 AM
I like what I've seen out of Jonah Lucas

Unlimited potential that Shaka is holding back.

wisblue

Quote from: WhiteTrash on February 11, 2024, 08:46:18 AM
Agreed.

Arizona is weird. By an reasonable definition, Arizona is not really close to being a blue blood. I suppose if your definition of blue blood has about 15 schools, I'd put AZ there.

In this context I'm talking about a team that has been in the top 10-20 for much of the last 10 years and makes the NCAA tournament virtually every year.

Viper

Quote from: Uncle Rico on February 11, 2024, 08:40:25 AM
Heckuva game from Jop, Gold and Mitchell yesterday.  Surprised Shaka keeps playing them
an idiot doing idiot things, hey
Support CBP 🇺🇸

MuggsyB

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 11:10:06 AM
In this context I'm talking about a team that has been in the top 10-20 for much of the last 10 years and makes the NCAA tournament virtually every year.

Based on your definition is Gonzaga a Blue Blood?

wisblue

#6168
Quote from: MuggsyB on February 11, 2024, 11:14:42 AM
Based on your definition is Gonzaga a Blue Blood?

Yes.

Instead of "Blue Blood" maybe I would call them "traditional powers". And for most people "tradition" doesn't go back too far.

mugrad_89

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 11, 2024, 11:14:42 AM
Based on your definition is Gonzaga a Blue Blood?

I can almost guarantee the Gonzaga will be back in the top 25 based on 1 win against an overrated Kentucky team.

tower912

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 11:40:06 AM
Yes.

Instead of "Blue Blood" maybe I would call them "traditional powers".

Traditional Powers, international man of mystery.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

wisblue

I haven't seen a game with Gillen on color for a while.

Does he routinely go "whoa" just about every time someone makes a shot?

Ardmore Mug

CBS 25+1  poll by Gary Parrish out today... MU up to 4..... Rodents down to 20...   No sight of Gonzaga ! ! !  8-)

MuggsyB

Quote from: wisblue on February 11, 2024, 11:52:50 AM
I haven't seen a game with Gillen on color for a while.

Does he routinely go "whoa" just about every time someone makes a shot?

He isn't doing it routinely. 

wisblue

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 11, 2024, 11:54:53 AM
He isn't doing it routinely.

I consider more than 10 to be pretty routine, and he has had at least that many.

Previous topic - Next topic