Scholarship table
This isn't a touchdown? This league is killing itself daily with stupidity on and off the field.http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/252749/nfl-owes-a-big-explanation-for-austin-sefarian-jenkins-fumble
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
The Packers would be fools to not sign CK. The pool of available quality quarterbacks is not deep.
I've never understood why the defense should get the ball on the 20 on a fumble out of the end zone. If that fumble occurs on the 1 yard line, the offense would retain it. The offense is massively penalized for actually advancing the ball further.Yeah I do understand this was a bad call.
Please do, please do, please do so the national nightmare can be over
The CONSENSUS is in first place. Skol Vikings!!
http://www.ajc.com/sports/football/green-bay-packers-potential-free-agent-targets-with-aaron-rodgers-out/7hpskEjpdUXr1VVVJcAhWK/When the 2nd and 3rd best options are Matt McGloin and Matt Barkley, I think you have to at least kick the tires on Kaep.Any quality backups out there the Pack could put together a trade for? Or do you just roll with Hundley and accept that you are only going to win 2 or 3 games the rest of the season and get a decent draft pick?
I would be shocked if McCarthy didn't stay with Hundley all the way.There are two possible outcomes.1. Hundley isn't very good - the result is a top 10 draft pick. A win because this team will never see a pick that high otherwise.2. Hundley is as good as McCarthy hopes he is. A win becauise the team gets in as a wild card and gets a high draft choice for Hundley.I know. Bur I'm stuck with this batch of lemons........
You should go outside. Take a deep breath.
Rodgers is why the Packers are good. Kaepernick isn’t 1/100th the football player Rodgers is. Signing him does nothing for the Packers.
I think the Packers should give Kaepernick a serious look...and sign him if McCarthy thinks he would beat out Hundley to start. Most of the NFL guys who say that his unemployment is justified are basing that on the huge attention he'd get...not a bad thing for a starting QB, but bad for chemistry if he is a backup. And up until now, it has been pretty clear that he'd be a backup on most teams. Would he be a backup for GB too? Hard to say. I suspect his mobility would help compensate for the weak offensive line, but the key would be less tangible to most of us - mostly McCarthy's gut feeling about how the players would react to having him in GB, how quickly he could learn the offense, etc. Bottom line - sign him if you think he would start, pass him by if you think he'd just be a high-profile bench warmer.Or maybe Favre will pull a Jordan....
Pretty much. GB isn't going anywhere without Rodgers.
Maybe, but McCarthy has a better picture of our chances than any of us here. If he thinks the Packers could sneak into a wild card game with Kaepernick starting, IMHO it would be worth it. Most thought the Vikings would never make it without Bridgewater and Peterson last season and thought they wasted their money on Bradford, but they squeezed in.