Kolek planning to go pro
In other words they crafted an opinion to get the result they wanted. As I said, it was political.
Politics, plain & simple.
4 verified cases in 2016 out of over a hundred million ballots cast. Generally speaking, it's not a thing.It is. Proof of citizenship or voter ID is a violation of the 24th Amendment that prohibits a poll tax. A photo ID costs money. The government is illegally collecting money in exchange for your right to vote. Voter ID laws are unconstitutional.Yeah...sadly true.
re:voter fraud-i guess that would depend on your source-over 1100 proven cases with almost 100 convictions, etc. if you care to look, here is a map where you can click on a state and it will list each person one by one. go ahead, it's user friendly- https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud and these are just the ones they've caught and you know, like bull murray and harold ramis...convicted? no never convicted...
1100 people, over a 20+ year, across 50 states, tens of thousands of elections, with over a BILLION ballots cast.Do you know what kind of "fraud rate" that is? .0000007%Methinks voter fraud ain't the problem when the powers that be are passing laws that cut down on early voting, close voting precincts in suspiciously democratic geographic areas, and require new forms of ID.
Facts. You'd like to think facts would have some effect, but people like rocket are immune to facts that disagree with what they want to be true.
If only we could be that accurate in manufacturing anything.
Nope. Rocket is speaking to very trivial facts.
Nope. Rocket is speaking facts.
It is. Proof of citizenship or voter ID is a violation of the 24th Amendment that prohibits a poll tax. A photo ID costs money. The government is illegally collecting money in exchange for your right to vote. Voter ID laws are unconstitutional.
Yes, 1100 cases in 20 years. .0000007% rate.Meanwhile https://www.thenation.com/article/wisconsins-voter-id-law-suppressed-200000-votes-trump-won-by-23000/But again, I've long realized that facts are simply ignored by some people if they conflict with their fragile worldview.
Back to the McAdams case...The most disturbing thing to me about this ruling is that the court effectively ruled that students have zero expectation of privacy with regard to their personal information, and its use and dissemination by their university, faculty members, and other students.The crux of this case was not the conduct of the student, academic freedom, etc., but the posting of personal information of a student without consent in a method that made it extremely likely to be used for harassment, unwelcome contact, and bullying. Marquette, correctly, viewed this behavior as unethical/unprofessional and deserving of disciplinary action.As someone who works in the data privacy sphere, this court's ruling is extremely alarming to me. Consent should always be obtained prior to collection and dissemination of personal information. The fact that the personal information was also placed elsewhere, such as a university directory, DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSENT. This outcome is yet another indication that our views of privacy in this country are so ridiculously ass backwards.
Politifact says false. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/dec/07/tweets/were-300000-wisconsin-voters-turned-away-polls-201/Both sides, wild claims.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny. Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.
Even the Washington Post reveals the names of college students. In the electronic age we live in, no one should expect any privacy be it in a national News Paper or a Faculty member blog.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/06/26/congressional-intern-suspended-after-yelling-obscenity-at-president-trump-at-the-capitol/?utm_term=.5063b3e9d158
Dude really? The Heritage Foundation again? An organization that exists to overturn Roe v Wade, make money for corporations, and restrict voting rights? You're right, it depends on your sources. And Heritage is the right wing partisan extreme. You may as well quote Info Wars or Breitbart.
You can make the same argument about Comrad Nichols and the Nation cited above.
Priorities USA is a progressive advocacy group and Super PAC that supported Clinton in 2016 and Barack Obama in 2012. The study was conducted by Civis Analytics, a data science firm founded by the chief analytics officer for Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012.It’s important to note that this study was conducted by a Democratic Party–affiliated group and has not been peer-reviewed or gone through the typical academic vetting process.