Pray for Charlie Kirk

[Pakuni]

MAGA has identified the true culprit.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, some conservatives are pointing fingers at South Park for mocking the conservative thought leader in a recent episode.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/south-park-charlie-kirk-maga-1236368149/

[GB Warrior]

Have you seen this video or heard the audio?

Looking at just those words, I can see why people who want to would quickly take it out of context. But, context matters. Joking/laughing as you're wrapping up a fake rant on Taylor becoming conservative in the future ... c'mon bud.

I don't have access to an LLM - can you help me better understand the context

[Uncle Rico]

There's a reason Charlie's kids faces are shown away every pic.  I'll let you heathens figure out why

So Nick Fuentes didn't target them?

[Blackhat]

[Shaka Shart]

POV Charlie yesterday when he came to?

[GB Warrior]

Charlie looks much happier here

[Blackhat]

Good night gentlemen.  You seem on a good path

[Uncle Rico]

Good night gentlemen.  You seem on a good path

Thanks, transphobe

[tower912]

Is too much empathy bad?

[Shaka Shart]

Good night gentlemen.  You seem on a good path

Don't assume my gender, bigot

[wadesworld]

Good night gentlemen.  You seem on a good path

So you'll post 36 more pictures of the dude tonight then. Can't wait!

[Shaka Shart]

Is too much empathy bad?

Having empathy despite the significant detrimental shortcomings of someone seems to result in further whining with the goal of only being satisfied until you are crying and groveling in complete submission at their feet.

So yeah, apparently

[GB Warrior]

Here's the full quote.

"Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."

Less context please

[Pakuni]

Good night gentlemen.  You seem on a good path

[Jay Bee]

Here's the full quote.

"Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."

Yes. And fully notes we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, and gives ideas on how to do so, including armed guards at schools.

[Uncle Rico]

Yes. And fully notes we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, and gives ideas on how to do so, including armed guards at schools.

As long as they're not black

[GB Warrior]

As long as they're not black

If they'd live in bigger houses with higher property taxes they could get them

[Uncle Rico]

If they'd live in bigger houses with higher property taxes they could get them

Not in my neighborhood, I hope

[Shaka Shart]

Why can't we just teach AI to be an armed elementary school security guard

[Pakuni]

As long as they're not black

Whenever I see a black cop I think, "Boy, I sure hope he's qualified."

[TallTitan34]

Yes. And fully notes we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, and gives ideas on how to do so, including armed guards at schools.

He does say that. But it doesn't change he's saying gun deaths are worth it to keep the second amendment in response to a question about a recent school shooting.

[Uncle Rico]

Whenever I see a black cop I think, "Boy, I sure hope he's qualified."

George Floyd was a father, too, but he deserved to die

[GB Warrior]

Why can't we just teach AI to be an armed elementary school security guard

Will get smart, hide, and be 20 minutes late to the party like at Parkland

[GB Warrior]

George Floyd was a father, too, but he deserved to die

Please post more pictures of him so we know how much you care about him

[Uncle Rico]

https://bsky.app/profile/newsguy.bsky.social/post/3lylygpp6hz2t

Hey, Muggsy-

Care to comment?