Backlash Coming

[MuggsyB]

There are a plethora of incredibly disturbing protests at major Universities across the USA and around the world praising this massacre.  It's beyond vile.  Antisemitic posts on social media are up like 500% after this,.  People are disgusting and morally bankrupt. 

[Uncle Rico]

There are a plethora of incredibly disturbing protests at major Universities across the USA and around the world praising this massacre.  It's beyond vile.  Antisemitic posts on social media are up like 500% after this,.  People are disgusting and morally bankrupt.

Well, antisemitic posts have been rising quite a bit since Elon took over X and more so after he complained about the ADL. 

[YaBlueIt]

Antisemitic posts on social media are up like 500% after this,.

Do you have any source on this?

[Pakuni]

There are a plethora of incredibly disturbing protests at major Universities across the USA and around the world praising this massacre.  It's beyond vile.  Antisemitic posts on social media are up like 500% after this,.  People are disgusting and morally bankrupt.

What we need are protests calling for America to invade another country, kill its leaders - and thousands of other citizens - and seize a fifth of its economy.
(Obviously any antisemitism and praise for Hamas is gross. Duh.)

[Heisenberg]

Someone failed Logic 101.

He usually does.

There is a narcissism among the left, especially evidenced in the two above, that everyone thinks like them. When things do not appear as they believe they should be, they are either taken out of context, or there must be a "logical" explanation.  This is what they refer to as "logic 101."

In this case, 34 Harvard student groups blamed solely Israel for the atrocities.

One of the narcissists above thought this was a big bunch of nothing, and those who were objecting might have been breaking the law. 

That seems like a complete overreaction and possibly illegal.

Then the backlash started, from future employers saying they would not hire them to the President of Harvard saying these student groups do not speak for them.

So, these student groups are trying to walk away from their signatures one by one.

But the narcissists cannot accept the obvious: these are rich, woke children trying to virtue signal and signed the letter without reading it. How do we know this? Because one rich, woke child told us that is exactly what happened.

She describes herself as a board member of one of these groups.

Why is she trying to walk away from her signature?  I'll let her explain it.

As a board member of a Harvard group that signed the statement on Israel, I think it was egregious and have resigned from my role. I am sorry for the pain this caused. My organization did not have a formal process and I didn't even see the statement until we had signed on.


See, she did not read it. Now that everyone freaked out, she panicked and tried to run away from it.

Why? Because she is a rich, woke child more interested in virtue signaling than what is actually being said? Or is she panicking because of this LinkedIn post last month?

I'm thrilled to share that I have accepted an offer to join Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP as a 2024 Summer Associate and a Conrad Harper Fellow in the firm's New York office! #STBSummer

I am also excited to be returning to Schulte Roth + Zabel LLP for part of the summer. I had a fantastic summer at Schulte and am very grateful to the attorneys and legal professionals who mentored me during the summer program.

Thank you to everyone who guided me through the recruiting process!

Could it be that this rich, woke child panicked that she would lose this coveted summer internship over her ignorance and is desperately trying to damage control?

No, this cannot be it, says the narcissists. There is only one right answer: what they think is the right answer.

So when faced with something they don't understand, they start making things up, designed solely to make themselves feel better.

Kids that join groups like the Harvard Kennedy Scbool Muslim Women's Caucus and Harvard Prison Divest Coalition want nothing more than to work for a hedge fund.
Everyone knows this.

The answer must only be that these are radical kids who probably have a problem showering daily. So, they are outliers from polite society. There's nothing to see here. Move along.

It can never be the stark reality that these organizations are populated by rich, white, woke children on their board about to take a summer internship with a 1,000-attorney firm in NYC, and they are panicking that some of their attorneys, especially some of the Jewish attorneys, might take exception to this her signature.

This cannot be ... the first narcissist thinks such a thought is illegal.

Again this is about the "logic 101." Everything they think and their worldview is correct. Anything that divergences from that, or anyone that divergences from that, is wrong. It is "logic 101," as they call it.

This is the problem I have with the narcissists (and the others like them that I refer to using the word "circle"). They are too blind to see their absolute arrogance and sanctimony. This is why they constantly attack me. Because I don't think like them, that makes me dangerous because there is only one right worldview, and I do not hold it, according to them. I must be ridiculed and shouted off the stage.

[TAMU, Knower of Ball]

There are a plethora of incredibly disturbing protests at major Universities across the USA and around the world praising this massacre.  It's beyond vile.  Antisemitic posts on social media are up like 500% after this,.  People are disgusting and morally bankrupt.

Can you share some examples of "disturbing protests at major universites across the USA praising this massacre"? I looked and haven't been able to find examples

[Pakuni]

Man writes 4,000-word screed on Scoop to call others narcissists.

[Heisenberg]

Man writes 4,000-word screed on Scoop to call others narcissists.

Thank you for making my point.

Either agree with this narcissist or be ridiculed. And if he shouts with the loudest meme, everyone will agree with him.

After all, there is only one worldview: his.

[MU82]

Man writes 4,000-word screed on Scoop to call others narcissists.

Also, supports a party that has been co-opted by the biggest narcissist in American history, not to mention a 91-felony criminal defendant who fomented a violent coup attempt against his own country.

[Galway Eagle]

There is a narcissism among the left, especially evidenced in the two above, that everyone thinks like them. When things do not appear as they believe they should be, they are either taken out of context, or there must be a "logical" explanation.  This is what they refer to as "logic 101."

In this case, 34 Harvard student groups blamed solely Israel for the atrocities.

One of the narcissists above thought this was a big bunch of nothing, and those who were objecting might have been breaking the law. 


Then the backlash started, from future employers saying they would not hire them to the President of Harvard saying these student groups do not speak for them.

So, these student groups are trying to walk away from their signatures one by one.

But the narcissists cannot accept the obvious: these are rich, woke children trying to virtue signal and signed the letter without reading it. How do we know this? Because one rich, woke child told us that is exactly what happened.

She describes herself as a board member of one of these groups.

Why is she trying to walk away from her signature?  I'll let her explain it.

As a board member of a Harvard group that signed the statement on Israel, I think it was egregious and have resigned from my role. I am sorry for the pain this caused. My organization did not have a formal process and I didn't even see the statement until we had signed on.


See, she did not read it. Now that everyone freaked out, she panicked and tried to run away from it.

Why? Because she is a rich, woke child more interested in virtue signaling than what is actually being said? Or is she panicking because of this LinkedIn post last month?

I'm thrilled to share that I have accepted an offer to join Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP as a 2024 Summer Associate and a Conrad Harper Fellow in the firm's New York office! #STBSummer

I am also excited to be returning to Schulte Roth + Zabel LLP for part of the summer. I had a fantastic summer at Schulte and am very grateful to the attorneys and legal professionals who mentored me during the summer program.

Thank you to everyone who guided me through the recruiting process!

Could it be that this rich, woke child panicked that she would lose this coveted summer internship over her ignorance and is desperately trying to damage control?

No, this cannot be it, says the narcissists. There is only one right answer: what they think is the right answer.

So when faced with something they don't understand, they start making things up, designed solely to make themselves feel better.

The answer must only be that these are radical kids who probably have a problem showering daily. So, they are outliers from polite society. There's nothing to see here. Move along.

It can never be the stark reality that these organizations are populated by rich, white, woke children kids on their board about to take a summer internship with a 1,000-attorney firm in NYC, and they are panicking that some of their attorneys, especially some of the Jewish attorneys, might take exception to this her signature.

This cannot be ... the first narcissist thinks such a thought is illegal.

Again this is about the "logic 101." Everything they think and their worldview is correct. Anything that divergences from that, or anyone that divergences from that, is wrong. It is "logic 101," as they call it.

This is the problem I have with the narcissists (and the others like them that I refer to using the word "circle"). They are too blind to see their absolute arrogance and sanctimony. This is why they constantly attack me. Because I don't think like them, that makes me dangerous because there is only one right worldview, and I do not hold it, according to them. I must be ridiculed and shouted off the stage.

Well no, too often you post opinions that aren't inherently a logos thought process they're rooted in a pathos argument. If you remove any emotional component of what they said and put it into a truth table then it becomes:

Did Israel establish an apartheid state? Yes

Did Israel commit human rights abuses? Yes

Is it a right of someone to want to fight back from human rights abuses? Yes

Now comes what you did which was post it on the belief that the fight back went too far (I 100% agree with this) but that's not a logical argument it's a pathos one. Heck one could argue that depending which ethical philosophy one is adhering to that it's not even an ethos argument. So it's well within those groups rights to post that statement as it stands up as true. It's also true but not logical that everyone else had a visceral emotional reaction to it because of the vile attacks that were carried out.

TLDR; what you call a logos argument is often a pathos argument.

[Heisenberg]

Also, supports a party that has been co-opted by the biggest narcissist in American history, not to mention a 91-felony criminal defendant who fomented a violent coup attempt against his own country.

Inaccurately characterize me with a description that is only designed to give this third narcissist license to ridicule me.

The reality is that all this is rich, woke children who do not pay attention or understand what they are agreeing to.

And if this is true at Harvard, it is true among most of the left. How dare I say this!!

So, this makes it okay to scream with the loudest memes and invent insults because when you do not hold the narcissist worldview, it is okay to attack and make things up.

Anything to get everyone to agree with the narcissists.

[Heisenberg]

Well no, too often you post opinions that aren't inherently a logos thought process they're rooted in a pathos argument. If you remove any emotional component of what they said and put it into a truth table then it becomes:

Did Israel establish an apartheid state? Yes

Did Israel commit human rights abuses? Yes

Is it a right of someone to want to fight back from human rights abuses? Yes

Now comes what you did which was post it on the belief that the fight back went too far (I 100% agree with this) but that's not a logical argument it's a pathos one. Heck one could argue that depending which ethical philosophy one is adhering to that it's not even an ethos argument. So it's well within those groups rights to post that statement as it stands up as true. It's also true but not logical that everyone else had a visceral emotional reaction to it because of the vile attacks that were carried out.

TLDR; what you call a logos argument is often a pathos argument.

Your moral equivalent is digesting.

[Galway Eagle]

Your moral equivalent is digesting.

This is also a pathos argument not logos... assuming you mean disgusting not digesting. If you did mean digesting then I'm lost at your response.

[TAMU, Knower of Ball]

So one rich white girl who has a fancy internship lined up explaining that she is backing out not because she fears for her internship but rather because her organization put out the statement without consulting her or letting her read it and she doesnt agree with it is somehow proof that all of these orgs are solely populated by rich white kids who want to virtue signal and are now backing out due to fear of losing their jobs and internships?

I agree that there are probably some rich white kids in these orgs. I also agree that some of that group probably virtual signal from time to time.  I even agree that there are likely members of these orgs (regardless of their race or tendency to virtue signal) who are backing down because of fear of harming their career. But you have to see the breakdown in logic in jumping from 1 person said they backed down for a completely different reason to all of them are backing down for the exact reason I claimed.

The important thing is we now know that you are pro cancelling.

[Silkk the Shaka]

That seems like a complete overreaction and possibly illegal.

Cancel culture!!

[Pakuni]

Man calls others names and then says he's the one being insulted.

Man claims Harvard Jews for Liberation, The Kennedy School Bangladesh Caucus, Harvard College Pakistan Students, Harvard Undergraduate Nepali Students Association, Society of Arab Students, and Harvard Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, all consist of white kids from the suburbs, and then insists he's being logical.

Man claims students in Harvard's Law, Kennedy, Divinity, Design and Medical schools are dying to work for a hedge fund, and scoffs at any suggestion otherwise.

People wouldn't ridicule you if you weren't so ridiculous.

[The Sultan]

Man calls others names and then says he's the one being insulted.

Man claims Harvard Jews for Liberation, The Kennedy School Bangladesh Caucus, Harvard College Pakistan Students, Harvard Undergraduate Nepali Students Association, Society of Arab Students, and Harvard Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, all consist of white kids from the suburbs, and then insists he's being logical.

Man claims students in Harvard's Law, Kennedy, Divinity, Design and Medical schools are dying to work for a hedge fund, and scoffs at any suggestion otherwise.

People wouldn't ridicule you if you weren't so ridiculous.

It's not that he's just ridiculous, it's that he is oftentimes just so obviously wrong, then shifts the goalposts (along with writing another five paragraphs of stuff most don't bother reading), only just to be as wrong again.

[Hards Alumni]

Well no, too often you post opinions that aren't inherently a logos thought process they're rooted in a pathos argument. If you remove any emotional component of what they said and put it into a truth table then it becomes:

Did Israel establish an apartheid state? Yes

Did Israel commit human rights abuses? Yes

Is it a right of someone to want to fight back from human rights abuses? Yes

Now comes what you did which was post it on the belief that the fight back went too far (I 100% agree with this) but that's not a logical argument it's a pathos one. Heck one could argue that depending which ethical philosophy one is adhering to that it's not even an ethos argument. So it's well within those groups rights to post that statement as it stands up as true. It's also true but not logical that everyone else had a visceral emotional reaction to it because of the vile attacks that were carried out.

TLDR; what you call a logos argument is often a pathos argument.

/applause

[The Sultan]

This is the problem I have with the narcissists (and the others like them that I refer to using the word "circle"). They are too blind to see their absolute arrogance and sanctimony. This is why they constantly attack me. Because I don't think like them, that makes me dangerous because there is only one right worldview, and I do not hold it, according to them. I must be ridiculed and shouted off the stage.

You really have quite the view of yourself.  There is nothing about you posting on Scoop that is "dangerous." Nor is anyone shouting you off the stage - you aren't a victim.  Keep posting your diatribes.  But you are going to get called out when they lack a logical thought process, which is usually the case.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

This is the problem I have with the narcissists (and the others like them that I refer to using the word "circle"). They are too blind to see their absolute arrogance and sanctimony. This is why they constantly attack me. Because I don't think like them, that makes me dangerous because there is only one right worldview, and I do not hold it, according to them. I must be ridiculed and shouted off the stage.

Why is it the right wing always whines and cries that they are victims when anyone dares contradict their views?

You just make it extra hilarious by on one hand claiming the other side thinks there is only one right worldview, then sobbing and playing the victim when they don't agree with your one right worldview.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

The reality is that all this is rich, woke children who do not pay attention or understand what they are agreeing to.

And if this is true at Harvard, it is true among most of the left. How dare I say this!!

Yeah, sure is a mystery why people say you've failed Logic 101.

[Uncle Rico]

Wow

[tower912]

Validating me putting him on ignore back in June.   

[MU82]

Inaccurately characterize me with a description that is only designed to give this third narcissist license to ridicule me.

The reality is that all this is rich, woke children who do not pay attention or understand what they are agreeing to.

And if this is true at Harvard, it is true among most of the left. How dare I say this!!

So, this makes it okay to scream with the loudest memes and invent insults because when you do not hold the narcissist worldview, it is okay to attack and make things up.

Anything to get everyone to agree with the narcissists.

You're a narcissist. And you're hilariously painting lots of people you don't have a clue about with a broad brush.

But I'll tell you what, Smuggles ... I will apologize bigly right now if you really haven't supported the 91-felony criminal defendant or the party he now owns. Because if a person hasn't actually supported the criminal defendant, I can't think of a worse insult than saying that person has. So again, if you haven't, a million apologies.

[Uncle Rico]

Speaking of grifts

https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

LOL