collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by BCHoopster
[Today at 06:07:37 PM]


2026 Bracketology by tower912
[Today at 06:03:10 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by Jay Bee
[Today at 06:00:08 PM]


Kam update by MuMark
[Today at 04:38:16 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Hards Alumni
[Today at 02:13:17 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by StillAWarrior
[Today at 12:56:16 PM]


Nov 28: MU vs OU in Chicago by Warrior of Law
[Today at 10:10:18 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Billy Hoyle

Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 17, 2025, 12:21:57 AMMy daughter takes gymnastics at the local high school. There's some intramrual basketball league that plays in the gym next door. A few months back, I heard a group of boys who were HS freshmen at most talking about what bets they missed on the night before.

We're screwed

I was at a game earlier this season sitting in front of some students (males and females) who spent the entire first half talking about their bets they were making during the game on first-half and second-half spreads and individual prop bets. It was non-stop. My brother and I were keeping track of the spreads and hoping the kids wouldn't hit.

Nothing will beat being at the BET (before betting apps) and hearing some obnoxious Wall Street bro down the row from me talking about his bet $1k on Georgetown, which he ended up losing. So he calls his bookie and says "I just went double on Notre Dame to cover. When asked who ND was playing he said "I don't know, but it's a sure thing." It was MU. He did not win his bet.  ;D  ;D

I think it was Ceasars that reported in 2023 of the over $1 billion bet they were taking home revenue of over $700 million. The sad part is so many bet with the idea they're going to win, that it's a sure thing.
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

tower912

That is why the news that Fan Duel is taking a beating this NFL season made me smile.  If you like watching those sites suffer, root for Detroit.   Lots of money went that way early, and if they finish the job, Vegas will take a hit.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Shaka Shart

" There are two things I can consistently smell.    Poop and Chlorine.  All poop smells like acrid baby poop mixed with diaper creme. And almost anything that smells remotely like poop; porta-johns, water filtration plants, fertilizer, etc., smells exactly the same." - Tower912

Re: COVID-19

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2025, 11:15:38 AMThat is why the news that Fan Duel is taking a beating this NFL season made me smile.  If you like watching those sites suffer, root for Detroit.   Lots of money went that way early, and if they finish the job, Vegas will take a hit.

Vegas always wins in the end
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


WhiteTrash

Quote from: Shaka Shart on January 17, 2025, 11:44:16 AMTruly despise George McCaskey

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/43439332/nfl-coaching-carousel-2025-agents-package-deals-consultants-goodell-concern
McCaskey is a football idiot.

Poles has to go and Armstrong should never show his face in Chicago ever again. Armstrong needs to find another "train to rob".

Hards Alumni

Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 17, 2025, 12:12:20 PMVegas always wins in the end

This man doesn't know Danny Ocean.

Billy Hoyle

moving on from gambling.

Any thoughts on Tom Brady continuing to call games (he's not good anyway, especially compared to Gregg Olsen) while owning the Raiders and being heavily involved in the coaching search? Seems like a massive conflict of interest that wouldn't be pushed aside for anyone other than Tom Brady

https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/tom-bradys-tv-restrictions-are-a-problem/
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

cheebs09

I personally wish he would focus on the Raiders. Especially with the restrictions placed on him, I don't see huge improvement coming.

Pakuni

#6483
Quote from: Billy Hoyle on January 17, 2025, 01:09:42 PMmoving on from gambling.

Any thoughts on Tom Brady continuing to call games (he's not good anyway, especially compared to Gregg Olsen) while owning the Raiders and being heavily involved in the coaching search? Seems like a massive conflict of interest that wouldn't be pushed aside for anyone other than Tom Brady

https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/tom-bradys-tv-restrictions-are-a-problem/

Notwithstanding his broadcasting skill, this seems to be a very dumb and manufactured controversy.
What's the conflict, exactly?
Will the way he broadcasts somehow impact the game? Do people believe the Fox job gives Brady access he wouldn't otherwise have (cause Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn wouldn't otherwise give him the time of day)? Both have already interviewed with him anyhow.
Is the worry that Brady will lavish undue praise on Johnson, and that Johnson will somehow hear the broadcast and decide he wants to go to Vegas as a result?

Just struggling to see why this is a thing. Brady is going on TV to talk about a football game, not negotiating a Gaza ceasefire or trading in state secrets. It ain't that important.

CreightonWarrior

Quote from: Pakuni on January 17, 2025, 01:54:37 PMNotwithstanding his broadcasting skill, this seems to be a very dumb and manufactured controversy.
What's the conflict, exactly?
Will the way he broadcasts somehow impact the game? Do people believe the Fox job gives Brady access he wouldn't otherwise have (cause Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn wouldn't otherwise give him the time of day)? Both have already interviewed with him anyhow.
Is the worry that Brady will lavish undue praise on Johnson, and that Johnson will somehow hear the broadcast and decide he wants to go to Vegas as a result?

Just struggling to see why this is a thing. Brady is going on TV to talk about a football game, not negotiating a Gaza ceasefire or trading in state secrets. It ain't that important.
I believe the broadcasters do in fact have a ton of access to the teams and have a good idea of what they're going to do each game. Brady will lose all that and it makes that job very difficult.

RJax55

Quote from: Pakuni on January 17, 2025, 01:54:37 PMNotwithstanding his broadcasting skill, this seems to be a very dumb and manufactured controversy.
What's the conflict, exactly?
Will the way he broadcasts somehow impact the game? Do people believe the Fox job gives Brady access he wouldn't otherwise have (cause Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn wouldn't otherwise give him the time of day)? Both have already interviewed with him anyhow.
Is the worry that Brady will lavish undue praise on Johnson, and that Johnson will somehow hear the broadcast and decide he wants to go to Vegas as a result?

Just struggling to see why this is a thing. Brady is going on TV to talk about a football game, not negotiating a Gaza ceasefire or trading in state secrets. It ain't that important.

Yeah, it's dumb. So he "might" get some additional facetime with Ben Johnson on Saturday. I'm sure that time will be spent hammering out a contract with the Raiders, lol.
 

RJax55

Quote from: CreightonWarrior on January 17, 2025, 02:17:56 PMI believe the broadcasters do in fact have a ton of access to the teams and have a good idea of what they're going to do each game. Brady will lose all that and it makes that job very difficult.

True, but access isn't going to help Tom. He has no rhythm in the booth and is constantly tripping up on basic stuff.

He does offer good observations on QB play. Tom would be significantly better in studio.

Pakuni

Quote from: CreightonWarrior on January 17, 2025, 02:17:56 PMI believe the broadcasters do in fact have a ton of access to the teams and have a good idea of what they're going to do each game. Brady will lose all that and it makes that job very difficult.

Sure, but again, I'm not talking about his broadcasting abilities. I'm talking about the brouhaha over him calling the game in which Ben Johnson is coaching and the supposed conflict of interest there.

The Sultan

Quote from: Billy Hoyle on January 17, 2025, 01:09:42 PMmoving on from gambling.

Any thoughts on Tom Brady continuing to call games (he's not good anyway, especially compared to Gregg Olsen) while owning the Raiders and being heavily involved in the coaching search? Seems like a massive conflict of interest that wouldn't be pushed aside for anyone other than Tom Brady

https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/tom-bradys-tv-restrictions-are-a-problem/

I don't care about any conflict of interest. I care that I have to listen to him.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

WhiteTrash

Quote from: RJax55 on January 17, 2025, 02:24:37 PMYeah, it's dumb. So he "might" get some additional facetime with Ben Johnson on Saturday. I'm sure that time will be spent hammering out a contract with the Raiders, lol.
 
These are the things NFL owners worry about. 0.001% problems.

RJax55

Quote from: WhiteTrash on January 17, 2025, 02:43:37 PMThese are the things NFL owners worry about. 0.001% problems.

No. It's dumb fans and media members who are making the fuss about this.

Team owners already have a back-channel to perspective coaching candidates through their agents.

WhiteTrash

Quote from: RJax55 on January 17, 2025, 02:49:14 PMNo. It's dumb fans and media members who are making the fuss about this.

Team owners already have a back-channel to perspective coaching candidates through their agents.
Actually there are league rules. (according to the NFL Radio guys)

Jockey

Quote from: WhiteTrash on January 17, 2025, 12:54:24 PMMcCaskey is a football idiot.

Poles has to go and Armstrong should never show his face in Chicago ever again. Armstrong needs to find another "train to rob".

Since 2018, agent and ex-Chicago defensive end Trace Armstrong and his agency, Athletes First, have represented two fired Bears head coaches, Matt Nagy and Eberflus; three fired offensive coordinators, Mark Helfrich, Luke Getsy and Shane Waldron; as well as current general manager Ryan Poles.

"I've never seen one agent have so much influence on one team and had so little success, but they keep going back and taking his guys," said one coaching agent, who requested anonymity to speak freely on the topic. "And we all kind of shake our heads like, have they not figured this out yet?"


And yet, some Bears fans are still hopeful.

Jockey

Quote from: Pakuni on January 17, 2025, 01:54:37 PMNotwithstanding his broadcasting skill, this seems to be a very dumb and manufactured controversy.
What's the conflict, exactly?
Will the way he broadcasts somehow impact the game? Do people believe the Fox job gives Brady access he wouldn't otherwise have (cause Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn wouldn't otherwise give him the time of day)? Both have already interviewed with him anyhow.
Is the worry that Brady will lavish undue praise on Johnson, and that Johnson will somehow hear the broadcast and decide he wants to go to Vegas as a result?

Just struggling to see why this is a thing. Brady is going on TV to talk about a football game, not negotiating a Gaza ceasefire or trading in state secrets. It ain't that important.

People can argue about this forever.

But there should be a disclaimer before each broadcast that he does. I think one big problem that people (including me) have is that he is banned from speaking honestly about officiating calls during the game.

In the end, it won't matter though. Ben Johnson will be in Vegas and Bears fans will be whining that this is part of the reason why.
The real reason is far different though, as I alluded to in my last post.

MU82

Here's the applicable part of The Athletic's sports media writers' take on the Brady situation. Don't shoot the messenger; I'm only relaying this passage ...

Brady wasn't formally approved as a minority owner of the Raiders until last October, but he reached an agreement with controlling owner Mark Davis to do so way back in May 2023. That's why the topic of the level of access Brady would have with teams as a Fox broadcaster was already a hot topic going into the 2024 season, which was his first on the job.

Ultimately, Brady, Fox and the NFL agreed before the season to put extensive restrictions on what he's allowed to do in place. He's not allowed access to other teams' facilities and practices, nor can he attend broadcast production meetings, which usually include interviews with coaches and players before games.

That's been the case all season, but the topic surfaced again after the Raiders fired GM Tom Telesco and head coach Antonio Pierce earlier this month. Davis consulted Brady prior to making those firings. And, since then, Brady has been involved with reaching out to GM and head coach candidates as well as participating in interviews.

It's created a situation where Brady is calling the games of coaches and executives that he's either already interviewed or could at some point. For instance, Brady will call the divisional round matchup between the Detroit Lions and Washington Commanders on Saturday. Brady will be called upon to analyze the decision-making of Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson and defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn, even though he's interviewed them both to potentially become the Raiders' next head coach. He may also speak to Johnson and/or Glenn on the sidelines before kickoff.

That's a pretty obvious conflict of interest, but it's one that — at least for now — the NFL and team owners have accepted living with.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

CreightonWarrior

Quote from: Pakuni on January 17, 2025, 02:29:51 PMSure, but again, I'm not talking about his broadcasting abilities. I'm talking about the brouhaha over him calling the game in which Ben Johnson is coaching and the supposed conflict of interest there.
oh to be honest I completely missed this

WhiteTrash

Quote from: Jockey on January 17, 2025, 05:42:30 PMIn the end, it won't matter though. Ben Johnson will be in Vegas and Bears fans will be whining that this is part of the reason why.
The real reason is far different though, as I alluded to in my last post.
If the Bears want him, they have the ability to get him. A little extra time with a minority owner will not be a decision point.

Whether it's Johnson or somebody else, I don't trust the Bears to get it right.

Dish

I've never believed for a second that Ben Johnson is going to be the next Bears head coach. Most meatball Bears fans will be upset when he doesn't take/get offered the job, but it was never a real possibility.

tower912

Nor have I.  The whole 'aligned vision' thing.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

cheebs09

Quote from: MU82 on January 17, 2025, 05:51:40 PMHere's the applicable part of The Athletic's sports media writers' take on the Brady situation. Don't shoot the messenger; I'm only relaying this passage ...

Brady wasn't formally approved as a minority owner of the Raiders until last October, but he reached an agreement with controlling owner Mark Davis to do so way back in May 2023. That's why the topic of the level of access Brady would have with teams as a Fox broadcaster was already a hot topic going into the 2024 season, which was his first on the job.

Ultimately, Brady, Fox and the NFL agreed before the season to put extensive restrictions on what he's allowed to do in place. He's not allowed access to other teams' facilities and practices, nor can he attend broadcast production meetings, which usually include interviews with coaches and players before games.

That's been the case all season, but the topic surfaced again after the Raiders fired GM Tom Telesco and head coach Antonio Pierce earlier this month. Davis consulted Brady prior to making those firings. And, since then, Brady has been involved with reaching out to GM and head coach candidates as well as participating in interviews.

It's created a situation where Brady is calling the games of coaches and executives that he's either already interviewed or could at some point. For instance, Brady will call the divisional round matchup between the Detroit Lions and Washington Commanders on Saturday. Brady will be called upon to analyze the decision-making of Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson and defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn, even though he's interviewed them both to potentially become the Raiders' next head coach. He may also speak to Johnson and/or Glenn on the sidelines before kickoff.

That's a pretty obvious conflict of interest, but it's one that — at least for now — the NFL and team owners have accepted living with.


Thanks for sharing. I thought he was more of a figurehead like Jay-Z with the Nets.This shows he's much more involved.

I feel he would do great on a panel show, especially on Fox with Gronk. I doubt that justifies what they paid him.

Previous topic - Next topic