collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pope Leo XIV by GoldenWarrior11
[Today at 01:09:00 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:31:59 PM]


NIL Money by MU82
[Today at 08:54:49 AM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 07, 2025, 10:37:23 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Shooter McGavin
[May 07, 2025, 10:30:31 PM]


APR Updates by Jay Bee
[May 07, 2025, 10:26:24 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Lens
[May 07, 2025, 05:31:48 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

FartyEightHours

My adjectives are wise, brilliant, and sexy

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: panda on April 02, 2023, 03:49:44 PM
Call your own fouls would make more sense at this point

1. Go to six fouls. Should have happened with shot clock reduction and these increasing player control flops.
2. Extend the semi circle
3. Eliminate three seconds in the lane but outside the semi circle.
4. All reviews one minute or less or the call on the floor sticks.  Reviewed centrally in NCAA tournaments for entire game not just last two minutes.

FartyEightHours

Need to develop some ref robots
My adjectives are wise, brilliant, and sexy

panda

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on April 02, 2023, 03:57:48 PM
1. Go to six fouls. Should have happened with shot clock reduction and these increasing player control flops.
2. Extend the semi circle
3. Eliminate three seconds in the lane but outside the semi circle.
4. All reviews one minute or less or the call on the floor sticks.  Reviewed centrally in NCAA tournaments for entire game not just last two minutes.

Agree - standardize refereeing as well. Move away from the paid independent contractor model.

21Jumpstreet

Quote from: cheebs09 on April 02, 2023, 03:38:02 PM
The women's national championship game hasn't been a great display of reffing.

Terrible refereeing, awesome game

wadesworld

Need to be making a play on the ball for a charge to be called. Get rid of sliding over and flopping.

Also not ref related, but standardize the basketball. How you can play with a different basketball depending on what gym you're in is so ridiculous.

CountryRoads

Quote from: wadesworld on April 02, 2023, 04:57:30 PM
Need to be making a play on the ball for a charge to be called. Get rid of sliding over and flopping.

Also not ref related, but standardize the basketball. How you can play with a different basketball depending on what gym you're in is so ridiculous.

Leave it to the Badgers to use a particularly strange basketball for their home games. I recall they are the only school to use whatever brand they use.

forgetful

Quote from: wadesworld on April 02, 2023, 04:57:30 PM
Need to be making a play on the ball for a charge to be called. Get rid of sliding over and flopping.

Also not ref related, but standardize the basketball. How you can play with a different basketball depending on what gym you're in is so ridiculous.

The fact that there isn't a standard basketball in the NCAA is absurd.


TallTitan34

I think I'm the only person in America who doesn't like Caitlin Clark.

Volume scorer who wants to sell t-shirts.

wadesworld

Quote from: TallTitan34 on April 02, 2023, 06:15:09 PM
I think I'm the only person in America who doesn't like Caitlin Clark.

Volume scorer who wants to sell t-shirts.

I mean her true shooting percentage is 62%, eFG% is 57%, and she averages 8.6 assists per game. Compare that BEPOY Tyler Kolek whose true shooting percentage was 58%, eFG% was 54%, and averaged 7.5 assists per game.

She's awesome offensively.

TallTitan34


MuggsyB

Quote from: TallTitan34 on April 02, 2023, 06:15:09 PM
I think I'm the only person in America who doesn't like Caitlin Clark.

Volume scorer who wants to sell t-shirts.

I can't say I've watched her much but I didn't get that impression Friday vs South Carolina.  She's incredibly skilled  and wasn't selfish at all moving the rock.

NickelDimer

Quote from: TallTitan34 on April 02, 2023, 06:15:09 PM
I think I'm the only person in America who doesn't like Caitlin Clark.

Volume scorer who wants to sell t-shirts.
I don't really get this take. She's basically the female version of Steph.
No Finish Line

MUEng92

Quote from: TallTitan34 on April 02, 2023, 06:15:09 PM
I think I'm the only person in America who doesn't like Caitlin Clark.

Volume scorer who wants to sell t-shirts.
Outside of Louisiana and South Carolina...yes you are.

MUDPT

Quote from: NickelDimer on April 02, 2023, 08:16:43 PM
I don't really get this take. She's basically the female version of Steph.

"Coughs" Markus

NickelDimer

Quote from: MUDPT on April 02, 2023, 09:41:55 PM
"Coughs" Markus
Except she makes her team significantly better. That's not a tourney team without her and she carried them to the finals. Not a great comp imo
No Finish Line

wadesworld

Quote from: NickelDimer on April 02, 2023, 09:55:51 PM
Except she makes her team significantly better. That's not a tourney team without her and she carried them to the finals. Not a great comp imo

Laughable to suggest Markus didn't make his team significantly better. Carried a team whose second leading scorer was Sacar Anim to what would've been an NCAA Tourney bid. Take Markus off that team and they might've been this year's Georgetown team.

Goose

Tall Titan
That was the first women's NCAA game I have ever watched and came away with same feelings about Clark. I know she had a tough game due to foul troubles, but did not find her to be much watch TV. I had seen highlights and heard all of the hype and maybe had too high of expectations.

The refs sucked and not sure how Clark who does not play any defense could be foul trouble. As bad the refs were, Clark's lack of effort on defense was worse, imo.


lawdog77

Quote from: Goose on April 03, 2023, 01:48:30 AM
Tall Titan
That was the first women's NCAA game I have ever watched and came away with same feelings about Clark. I know she had a tough game due to foul troubles, but did not find her to be much watch TV. I had seen highlights and heard all of the hype and maybe had too high of expectations.

The refs sucked and not sure how Clark who does not play any defense could be foul trouble. As bad the refs were, Clark's lack of effort on defense was worse, imo.
I don't know how somebody could have watched that 1st quarter and not came away extremely impressed.

Goose

Lawdog

I thought the first quarter was fun and Clark made some great plays, both passing and shooting. As I mentioned, maybe my expectations were too high. She has outstanding offensive talent and possibly worn out from the game on Friday and that is understandable. That said, a little defense would not hurt her game.

I hope she makes a ton of money and helps build excitement around the women's game. I am sure that I will tune in next year to see her play again.

MUfan12

Quote from: lawdog77 on April 03, 2023, 05:26:25 AM
I don't know how somebody could have watched that 1st quarter and not came away extremely impressed.

There's a good segment of people here that didn't appreciate our all time leading scorer, so that shouldn't be all that surprising.

NickelDimer

Quote from: wadesworld on April 02, 2023, 10:45:14 PM
Laughable to suggest Markus didn't make his team significantly better. Carried a team whose second leading scorer was Sacar Anim to what would've been an NCAA Tourney bid. Take Markus off that team and they might've been this year's Georgetown team.
Safe to say your definition of significant differs from mine...pretty significantly
No Finish Line

4everwarriors

#0 can't carry Clarke's jockstrap, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

panda

Quote from: NickelDimer on April 03, 2023, 07:25:53 AM
Safe to say your definition of significant differs from mine...pretty significantly

Markus Howard carried a team which featured Sacar anim as its second leading scorer to a safe ncaa bid. That is significant.

tower912

MU's all time leading scorer.  Two time all American.  Cousy award finalist as best PG in the country.

Disrespected by those who don't know ball.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Previous topic - Next topic