collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Does Bucky NOT have a Basketball NIL? by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:05:24 AM]


2024-25 Outlook by WellsstreetWanderer
[April 25, 2024, 10:03:37 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[April 25, 2024, 09:43:05 PM]


[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by Uncle Rico
[April 25, 2024, 05:51:25 PM]


Campus camp-out with cool flags? by FreewaysBurnerAccount
[April 25, 2024, 04:52:25 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[April 25, 2024, 02:51:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Bracketology Thread 2023  (Read 80482 times)

Goose

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10568
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2023, 07:42:35 PM »
Doctor V

I do think talking 10 conference wins is a bit silly with a 3-1 start, including playing at two tough places. Wanting to see success in Feb and March is fair, but thinking only 7 more conference wins seems crazy to me.

BLWarrior91

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 584
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2023, 08:28:54 PM »
I think the BE gets more than 4 teams in. In fact, I think 6 is much more likely than 4.

Absolutely right.  No way that only four teams get in.  The league is underrated every year.  Of course, the experts said Creighton was the best team and we were a ninth place team. 

DoctorV

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2560
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2023, 08:35:19 PM »
Doctor V

I do think talking 10 conference wins is a bit silly with a 3-1 start, including playing at two tough places. Wanting to see success in Feb and March is fair, but thinking only 7 more conference wins seems crazy to me.

I’m only talking 10 conference wins because that’s what I think it would take to earn a bid, but Brew thinks it’s 11 and he’s probably right.
I just can’t see the NET dropping below the 50s with 10 conference losses.
Of course moreso than other years the margins will have to be bigger, especially at home, since a few of the teams are really bad.

12/13 conference wins is much more likely, but crazier things have happened.
You can’t tell me after that 7 game stretch last year you would have ever imagined the season ending the way it did, with such poor play down the stretch?

I’m optimistic but very cautiously optimistic. We cannot count our chickens before they hatch, not with this MU program as of late.
Let’s not forget that Shaka has had his own late season and NCAAt and big game bugaboos of late.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22910
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #28 on: January 02, 2023, 10:56:53 PM »
What happened last year has as much to do with this year as being 0-4 in close games "proved" Shaka couldn't win close games.

Last year is immaterial to this year, as is everything Shaka's previous teams did, as is anything having to do with Wojo.

Enjoy this team. If it wins a lot and advances in March, it will not be because of Al or Wade or Buzz. And if it loses too much and fails, it will not be because of past failures.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4586
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2023, 07:26:33 AM »
What happened last year has as much to do with this year as being 0-4 in close games "proved" Shaka couldn't win close games.

Last year is immaterial to this year, as is everything Shaka's previous teams did, as is anything having to do with Wojo.

Enjoy this team. If it wins a lot and advances in March, it will not be because of Al or Wade or Buzz. And if it loses too much and fails, it will not be because of past failures.

I’m not sure that’s accurate. It’s many of the same players. Hopefully they learned from last year and more experience is going to lead to a stronger finish.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22910
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #30 on: January 03, 2023, 07:34:14 AM »
I’m not sure that’s accurate. It’s many of the same players. Hopefully they learned from last year and more experience is going to lead to a stronger finish.

Several of the same players but every single one of those has been asked to take on much more significant roles; plus, several newcomers.

I do hope you're right about some lessons being learned, and not just the players but coaches, but I was speaking more to fan angst about, "That's the way things were, so that's the way they'll continue to be." If we happen to fade again, it won't be because the 2019, 2020 and 2022 teams faded IMHO.

I guess the idealist in me wishes Marquette fans would just enjoy this team this season for what it is, and to evaluate success or failure based on what this team actually does or doesn't accomplish ... instead of looking backward.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23738
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2023, 07:47:58 AM »
Enjoy the moment?!?!?!?!

Harrumph.

ESPN has MU as a 5 seed. 
« Last Edit: January 03, 2023, 08:41:13 AM by tower912 »
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10025
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2023, 08:49:44 AM »
Enjoy the moment?!?!?!?!

Harrumph.

ESPN has MU as a 5 seed.

Great.  That’s a loss
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2023, 10:04:57 AM »
Great.  That’s a loss

Probably going to wear baby blues, loss.

Hopefully MU gets buried on TruTV to avoid that national television curse.

DoctorV

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2560
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2023, 12:05:37 PM »
The dreaded 5v12…

Mu8891

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 765
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2023, 12:34:53 PM »
A 5 seed would be GREAT …

But, wasn’t MU a 5 seed in the
JA Morant debacle??

StillAWarrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #36 on: January 03, 2023, 12:54:56 PM »
A 5 seed would be GREAT …

But, wasn’t MU a 5 seed in the
JA Morant debacle??

I'd love to get a No. 1 seed...

But does anybody remember that UMBC/UVA debacle?

Just get into the tournament...and then win.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2023, 12:56:30 PM by StillAWarrior »
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

nyg

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #37 on: January 03, 2023, 01:40:18 PM »

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23738
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #38 on: January 03, 2023, 01:44:30 PM »
A 5 seed would be GREAT …

But, wasn’t MU a 5 seed in the
JA Morant debacle??

So was MU-Tulsa. 
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #39 on: January 03, 2023, 06:02:51 PM »
Absolutely right.  No way that only four teams get in.  The league is underrated every year.  Of course, the experts said Creighton was the best team and we were a ninth place team.

It was a rough non con for sure. But UCONN,X, MU, PC, and Creighton all appear in solid shape. I also wouldn’t rule out Nova getting to bubble.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13796
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #40 on: January 03, 2023, 06:04:57 PM »
wrong thread
« Last Edit: January 03, 2023, 06:06:51 PM by PGsHeroes32 »
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13796
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #41 on: January 03, 2023, 06:05:55 PM »
wrong thread
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

GoldenEagles03

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3762
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #42 on: January 06, 2023, 03:05:39 PM »
Highly intriguing (and meaningless, I know) pairings for MU in Lunardi's latest bracket.

Dropped Marquette from a 5 seed to a 6 seed, facing Greg Elliott and 11 seeded Pitt with the opportunity to face 3 seeded Texas in the next round.

Greg/Marquette

Shaka/Texas

Hmmmm.
VIOLENCE!

MarquetteMike1977

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #43 on: January 06, 2023, 03:20:32 PM »
Highly intriguing (and meaningless, I know) pairings for MU in Lunardi's latest bracket.

Dropped Marquette from a 5 seed to a 6 seed, facing Greg Elliott and 11 seeded Pitt with the opportunity to face 3 seeded Texas in the next round.

Greg/Marquette

Shaka/Texas

Hmmmm.

Just saw this thread. Thank You for posting. Yes and Joe has 5 Big East Teams in this time.

GoldenEagles03

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3762
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #44 on: January 06, 2023, 05:34:22 PM »
I know it is early and it doesn't matter but still hate when bracketologists do this.

Marquette 12-4
Baylor 10-4

Marquette head to head win

Marquette KP-17
Baylor KP- 25

Marquette NET- 23
Baylor NET- 29

Marquette- 6 seed
Baylor- 4 seed

Do they even try?
VIOLENCE!

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5858
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #45 on: January 06, 2023, 05:40:49 PM »
I know it is early and it doesn't matter but still hate when bracketologists do this.

Marquette 12-4
Baylor 10-4

Marquette head to head win

Marquette KP-17
Baylor KP- 25

Marquette NET- 23
Baylor NET- 29

Marquette- 6 seed
Baylor- 4 seed

Do they even try?

Baylor has two wins better than Marquette’s best win, and although neither team has any “bad” losses, Marquette has two losses worse than Baylor’s worst loss. It is what it is.


jfp61

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #46 on: January 06, 2023, 06:07:52 PM »
I know it is early and it doesn't matter but still hate when bracketologists do this.

Marquette 12-4
Baylor 10-4

Marquette head to head win

Marquette KP-17
Baylor KP- 25

Marquette NET- 23
Baylor NET- 29

Marquette- 6 seed
Baylor- 4 seed

Do they even try?

They probably are both 6 seeds. Maybe Mu is a 7

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26462
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #47 on: January 06, 2023, 06:41:52 PM »
I know it is early and it doesn't matter but still hate when bracketologists do this.

Marquette 12-4
Baylor 10-4

Marquette head to head win

Marquette KP-17
Baylor KP- 25

Marquette NET- 23
Baylor NET- 29

Marquette- 6 seed
Baylor- 4 seed

Do they even try?

Yes, we do, and this is evidence you don't understand the process. I almost never look at head to head. Honestly, I don't care about it at all unless there's no separating the teams. On 1/1, I had Baylor as a 4 and Marquette as a 7. Baylor's best wins were UCLA & Gonzaga on neutral courts, both better than Marquette's home win over Baylor. They had no losses outside Q1, while MU lost at home to a sub-50 UW team. The resumes weren't even close.

Had Marquette beat Madison and Providence, then maybe that head to head comes into play. But they didn't, so it didn't. You'd have to be really lazy or biased to put Marquette ahead of Baylor.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

WhiteTrash

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #48 on: January 06, 2023, 06:43:39 PM »
Yes, we do, and this is evidence you don't understand the process. I almost never look at head to head. Honestly, I don't care about it at all unless there's no separating the teams. On 1/1, I had Baylor as a 4 and Marquette as a 7. Baylor's best wins were UCLA & Gonzaga on neutral courts, both better than Marquette's home win over Baylor. They had no losses outside Q1, while MU lost at home to a sub-50 UW team. The resumes weren't even close.

Had Marquette beat Madison and Providence, then maybe that head to head comes into play. But they didn't, so it didn't. You'd have to be really lazy or biased to put Marquette ahead of Baylor.
NET no matta

Its DJOver

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3064
Re: Bracketology Thread 2023
« Reply #49 on: January 06, 2023, 07:11:22 PM »
NET no matta

It is a factor, it is not the only factor, see Providence last year getting a 4 seed despite not even being in the top 30 NET.