collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2026 Bracketology by tower912
[Today at 05:12:44 AM]


Where's Sam? by JakeBarnes
[Today at 12:07:59 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[May 14, 2025, 10:02:47 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by Jay Bee
[May 14, 2025, 07:48:47 PM]


Kam update by wadesworld
[May 14, 2025, 07:18:42 PM]


Pearson to MU by BCHoopster
[May 14, 2025, 06:07:37 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Hards Alumni
[May 14, 2025, 02:13:17 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Johnny B

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 27, 2021, 09:58:47 PM
Do you think Stan potentially has the goods?
i think he does cbd but not really like typical weed and bong stuff idk

MuggsyB

Quote from: Johnny B on February 27, 2021, 10:08:00 PM
i think he does cbd but not really like typical weed and bong stuff idk

Ha!  I guess I walked into that one. 

JWags85

#727
Quote from: GooooMarquette on February 27, 2021, 09:45:03 PM

Not anymore, hey?

They lost on the road to a preseason top 5 team, who had underachieved but is still stacked, after a 3 week layoff.  They are still light years ahead of almost everyone.  If they okayed that game on a neutral floor next Sat, Baylor is probably favorites by 6-8 pts.

Quote from: BLM on February 27, 2021, 06:56:50 PM
This weekend is the first time I'm watching more than a minute or two of Loyola. It could just be a bad weekend, but I am fully unimpressed by them. There's talk of this team being better than their Final Four team but I do not see that one bit. That team was an 11 seed because they played in a bad conference and they got a couple breaks in their draw, but they were legit. I had them going to the Elite Eight in my bracket that season. Anything can happen in a one and done situation, but I'd be pretty surprised if they even made the second round.

Their offense is BRUTAL.  And when you shorten the game like they do and have minimal possessions, you let lesser teams stick in games if you're cold.  It was UGLY basketball


Billy Hoyle

#728
Quote from: MuggsyB on February 27, 2021, 09:58:47 PM
Do you think Stan potentially has the goods?

Let's see in a few years. Saint Stan took over a team set up for a big year. They're senior/fifth year dominated.
"Kevin thinks 'mother' is half a word." - Mike Deane

GooooMarquette

Quote from: JWags85 on February 27, 2021, 10:40:37 PM

They lost on the road to a preseason top 5 team, who had underachieved but is still stacked, after a 3 week layoff.  They are still light years ahead of almost everyone.  If they okayed that game on a neutral floor next Sat, Baylor is probably favorites by 6-8 pts.



No question they had challenges today or that they would be favorites on a neutral court. But today showed that they are hardly the unbeatable team that some make them out to be.

That's all I'm saying.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: brewcity77 on February 05, 2021, 12:10:58 AM
I really think those two are just in a different class. Really hope we get a matchup of unbeatens in the NCAA Final.

Quote from: rocky_warrior on February 05, 2021, 12:59:42 AM
I expect you'll be disappointed. 

edit:  but hey, too bad their early season game was "postponed"

Bumping this, because you gave a long winded answer about how those two were the best two - but never addressed the "unbeaten" part which was my  bigger point :)  Though I admit it's hard to know what to expect from Baylor after the covid pause.

brewcity77

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 27, 2021, 09:55:42 PM
They haven't beaten anyone since Jan 15th and really haven't beaten anyone besides Loyola all year.

At Maryland is a Q1A win, they have 4 Q1 and 9 Q1+2 wins, and no losses outside the first two quadrants. They are a consensus 5-seed that might slip to the 6. They are certainly not an 8/9 right now and that link confirms it.

If you want to provide a list of 32 better resumes, go ahead. But just saying they are an 8/9 because...I don't know, I guess you want them to be isn't a strong argument.

Uncle Rico

Quote from: Billy Hoyle on February 27, 2021, 10:46:59 PM
Let's see in a few years. Saint Stan took over a team set up for a big year. They're senior/fifth year dominated.

LMU is 330th in turnover % on offense and 258th in forcing turnovers.  They foul a lot and are 204th in defensive effective fg%.  So, his defense at LMU looks familiar.

A lot of the minutes are going to juniors. sophomores and a freshmen.  They could be very good next year.

He's not coming back to Milwaukee anyway.  If he's successful at LMU, I'd suspect he'll wait for a Pac-12 job
Guster is for Lovers

MU82

In anticipation of the Big Ten and NCAA tournaments, the city of Indianapolis, with the blessing of the state, has relaxed COVID-19 restrictions.

Bars and restaurants can stay open until 2 a.m., bars can operate at 50% capacity (up from 25%), and restaurants can operate at 75% capacity (up from 50%).

"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

MuggsyB

#734
Oklahoma St. may be a sleeper team.  Cunningham is coming on strong and that team has athletes.  I'm not so sure the B12 isn't right there with the B14.  They have a number of teams capable of going deep.  I wouldn't read too much in the Baylor loss yesterday. 

The Sultan

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 28, 2021, 11:26:54 AM
Oklahoma St. may be a sleeper team.  Cunningham is coming on strong abs that team has athletes.  I'm not so sure the B12 isn't right there with the B14.  They have a number of teams capable of going deep.  I wouldn't read too much in the Bayor loss yesterday.

So they work on their core strength?  😉😉😉
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Uncle Rico

Quote from: MuggsyB on February 28, 2021, 11:26:54 AM
Oklahoma St. may be a sleeper team.  Cunningham is coming on strong abs that team has athletes.  I'm not so sure the B12 isn't right there with the B14.  They have a number of teams capable of going deep.  I wouldn't read too much in the Bayor loss yesterday.

Year-in and year-out, the Big 12 is as deep as any league.  They've lacked national title contenders outside KU a lot of those years but it's always one of the most entertaining leagues and without the pretension of the Big 14
Guster is for Lovers

MuggsyB


MuggsyB

Is Oklahoma St. eligible for the tournament?  I forgot about their 1 yr ban.

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: MuggsyB on March 01, 2021, 10:05:40 PM
Is Oklahoma St. eligible for the tournament?  I forgot about their 1 yr ban.

Yes
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

MuggsyB

Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 01, 2021, 10:05:58 PM
Yes

Dangerous team.  When I watch these games it's evident we need to increase our overall physicality and athleticism.  They have guys that get after it for 40 mins.  We seem to be way behind the tier 1 teams.  Everything needs to change although this is a process.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: MuggsyB on March 01, 2021, 10:11:05 PM
We seem to be way behind the tier 1 teams.  Everything needs to change although this is a process.

That may be your observation, but remember MU is 4-7 against NET Q1 teams.  That's fine. It's the 2-5 against against NET Q2 (tier 2?) teams that is the problem!

MuggsyB

Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 01, 2021, 11:29:01 PM
That may be your observation, but remember MU is 4-7 against NET Q1 teams.  That's fine. It's the 2-5 against against NET Q2 (tier 2?) teams that is the problem!

Fair enough r w.  But if you watch these games it's apparent we have severe probs.  My take is our margin for error is infinitesimally small because of a wide range of issues.  We epitomize inconsistency and it's rather unfortunate.  Is it solvable?  Yes, but it will take a different approach and honest introspection.

Spotcheck Billy

During last night's OK vs. OK St game they showed a graphic that Cunningham's 40 points against OK on Saturday was the 1st time a player has scored 40 against a top 10 team since Novak vs. UConn.

I still have the baseball caps from that night.

brewcity77

Quote from: MuggsyB on March 01, 2021, 10:05:40 PM
Is Oklahoma St. eligible for the tournament?  I forgot about their 1 yr ban.

Currently yes. They were given the ban, but then appealed, which puts the ban on hold until the final decision is rendered. The thought is the NCAA won't rule until after the season so Cunningham can play, but if they ruled in the next 2 weeks, they could still ban them for this year.

That said, banning the likely #1 draft pick when you already won't have individuals like Kuminga or Green and teams like Duke, Michigan State, and Kentucky, it seems like they would want Cade in.

wadesworld

#745
So #3 Baylor is playing #6 West Virginia at 4:00 PM Central Time on a Tuesday so that they can have 8-14 Kentucky vs. 13-10 Ole Miss (playing in the Eastern Time Zone, so could flip those two and that game would be starting at 5:00 local time) at 8:00 PM on ESPN?  Awesome.

wadesworld

The reffing in this Baylor vs. WVU game is pretty bad.

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: BLM on March 02, 2021, 05:56:24 PM
The reffing in this Baylor vs. WVU game is pretty bad.

If youre a WVU fan it aint so bad.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

wadesworld

Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 02, 2021, 06:15:53 PM
If youre a WVU fan it aint so bad.

Exactly. Baylor is getting absolutely hammered every time down the court. I'm very impressed that they're in overtime and maybe going to win this game. They're incredibly tough physically and mentally. This is what a Buzz team would've looked like if his teams were also one of the best shooting teams in the country.

wadesworld

Going from a 94-89 overtime game to a 10-10 game over 10 minutes in is quite the change. The B1G sucks, even when it's good.

Previous topic - Next topic