collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by NCMUFan
[Today at 05:02:55 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by BE_GoldenEagle
[Today at 03:39:36 PM]


Pearson to MU by WhiteTrash
[Today at 03:30:09 PM]


NM by The Sultan
[Today at 03:10:35 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by MU82
[Today at 09:26:42 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[May 18, 2025, 06:49:48 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[May 18, 2025, 02:32:12 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

muwarrior69

#25
Quote from: brewcity77 on September 17, 2020, 10:03:03 PM
Immunity is not a given. There are numerous reports from multiple countries of recovered COVID patients contracting the disease again, and generally it looks like COVID antibodies only stay in the body 3-4 months, which is why vaccination might not be the guarantee everyone is hoping for, especially if they need to generate enough doses for everyone to get it 3-4 times per year.

With all the cases of football players testing positive then why are they going to play football? Also did those patients actually recover or did they have a relapse; after all the body is still producing antibodies for 3-4 months? Also there is no evidence of high rates of reinfection, if there were would already know. Even if a player tests positive and is asymptomatic why would you quarantine the whole team and cancel games? These are young healthy athletes. If however a player is sick I could see the team quarantined. Again, I would not want to be on this years NCAA selection committee.

As for a vaccine it will be at least another two years before we know if they are safe and effective and like  you I am not very optimistic as it very difficult to produce a vaccine for corona viruses. If it was we would have a vaccine for the common cold.

https://www.newsobserver.com/news/coronavirus/article245665350.html

forgetful

Quote from: muwarrior69 on September 18, 2020, 06:58:09 AM
Also did those patients actually recover or did they have a relapse; after all the body is still producing antibodies for 3-4 months? Also there is no evidence of high rates of reinfection, if there were would already know. Even if a player tests positive and is asymptomatic why would you quarantine the whole team and cancel games? These are young healthy athletes. If however a player is sick I could see the team quarantined. Again, I would not want to be on this years NCAA selection committee.

As for a vaccine it will be at least another two years before we know if they are safe and effective and like  you I am not very optimistic as it very difficult to produce a vaccine for corona viruses. If it was we would have a vaccine for the common cold.

https://www.newsobserver.com/news/coronavirus/article245665350.html

There are cases now proven to be reinfection, where they analyzed the DNA of the two infections.

We really don't know how prevalent such reinfections are, both because of low/moderate rates of transmission in the US, and because of poor testing. It could be possible that reinfections are more common, but often result in asymptomatic, or low symptom cases that mask as ongoing recovery.

For asymptomatic individuals, they still need to be quarantined, and it would be wise to quarantine all teammates. They are still infectious, and the goal is to avoid spread to other players. The fact that they are "young healthy athletes" is meaningless. I know of a 21 year old training to compete in the olympics, that now months after infection cannot walk up a flight of stairs without sitting down to take a break.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Yawn. Take the Covid talk to a Covid thread. This board is unreadable right now.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

The Big East

Hopefully, MU can work out a plan to revive the UCLA game for this season.

Johnny B

#29
Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on September 18, 2020, 10:35:25 AM
Yawn. Take the Covid talk to a Covid thread. This board is unreadable right now.
how is the season start not blank related

Galway Eagle

Quote from: Johnny B on September 18, 2020, 01:50:41 PM
how is the season start not covid relatted

Just don't say covid. Put "blank" instead
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

NCMUFan

When will they put together a conference schedule?

Mr. Nielsen

If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

brewcity77

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on September 18, 2020, 06:15:25 AM
Brew, in that scenario would you expect those games to be televised?

I would expect the networks to pick and choose, but I do think most if not all would be available, at least regionally.

MUDPT

No NBA until at least Christmas. I'd assume NHL wouldn't start until around same time. Networks need weekday programming.

The Sultan

Why would you even play the games if they weren't televised?  Why go through that expense?  Without TV you might as well just have UWM bus down on a Saturday afternoon. That's the whole point of continuing with the season. To get TV $$$. 
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

GooooMarquette

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on September 19, 2020, 07:19:03 AM
Why would you even play the games if they weren't televised?  Why go through that expense?  Without TV you might as well just have UWM bus down on a Saturday afternoon. That's the whole point of continuing with the season. To get TV $$$.


I think many will be televised, probably most in a conference like the Big East. But getting tv$$$ from the regular season games isn't the only purpose for playing. They are also jockeying for position for what they assume will eventually be an NCAA tournament. Those games, of course, will be televised, and the source of the biggest money of all.

Ultimately, the number of regular season games that are televised will be determined by how many other sports they are competing with at the time.

muwarrior69

So when can we expect a schedule?

bananahammock

Wonder if they'll go to one of the locations attempting to form a bubble and knock out the majority of their non-con over ~ a weeks time.

real chili 83

Do we play home games at the Al?

oldwarrior81

I heard from someone over at Villanova, that the Marquette-Wisconsin game will be included as one of the Gavitt Challenge games.

Supposedly, they're really trying to stay local with those games.   Creighton-Nebraska, Rutgers-Seton Hall, DePaul-Illinois, Villanova-Penn State, Maryland-Georgetown, Xavier-Ohio State, Butler-Indiana or Purdue.

MU82

Quote from: real chili 83 on September 23, 2020, 12:17:26 PM
Do we play home games at the Al?

If they aren't letting in fans, except maybe family, it's the only thing that makes sense. Unless they are contractually obligated to play at Fiserv and the powers-that-be won't let them out of the contract.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Galway Eagle

Quote from: oldwarrior81 on September 23, 2020, 12:19:41 PM
I heard from someone over at Villanova, that the Marquette-Wisconsin game will be included as one of the Gavitt Challenge games.

Supposedly, they're really trying to stay local with those games.   Creighton-Nebraska, Rutgers-Seton Hall, DePaul-Illinois, Villanova-Penn State, Maryland-Georgetown, Xavier-Ohio State, Butler-Indiana or Purdue.

I feel like Depaul Northwestern's a little bit more of a local game if that's their goal. In fact a quick Apple Maps check shows Depaul to Purdue is also a shorter drive. And now that I think about it we're closer to NW than we are to UW. This whole local concept is weird
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

The Sultan

Quote from: MU82 on September 23, 2020, 12:31:35 PM
If they aren't letting in fans, except maybe family, it's the only thing that makes sense. Unless they are contractually obligated to play at Fiserv and the powers-that-be won't let them out of the contract.

I'm sure there is some sort of relief built into the contract.

But Wojo might want to play there anyway due to it merely being an NBA arena.  An empty NBA arena is still cooler than an empty glorified practice gym.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

GoldenWarrior11

Quote from: Galway Eagle on September 23, 2020, 01:13:15 PM
I feel like Depaul Northwestern's a little bit more of a local game if that's their goal. In fact a quick Apple Maps check shows Depaul to Purdue is also a shorter drive. And now that I think about it we're closer to NW than we are to UW. This whole local concept is weird

It's eleven miles from Lincoln Park campus to Evanston.  It's one hundred twenty-six miles from DePaul to Purdue.    Marquette to either Madison or to Evanston is a wash, since it is both around 75 miles.  However, keeping games in-state, where possible follows more guidelines than having teams travel state-to-state - especially, in Illinois, where Wisconsin was just added to the travel ban list (which could and probably will change before the season starts anyways).

We R Final Four

Quote from: Galway Eagle on September 23, 2020, 01:13:15 PM
And now that I think about it we're closer to NW than we are to UW.
The distances are samesies.

The Big East

#46
Quote from: Galway Eagle on September 23, 2020, 01:13:15 PM
I feel like Depaul Northwestern's a little bit more of a local game if that's their goal. In fact a quick Apple Maps check shows Depaul to Purdue is also a shorter drive. And now that I think about it we're closer to NW than we are to UW. This whole local concept is weird
Fans generally enjoy local rivalries. I think in an environment with restricted capacities, there may be some modest TV ratings benefit that comes into consideration as well.  I think the Big East benefits from this localized structure of game this year .  In future years, when more  fans can be at the game, I think going back to matching the teams by competitive strength makes more sense .

Galway Eagle

Quote from: We R Final Four on September 23, 2020, 01:29:36 PM
The distances are samesies.

Really? Thought it was like 100mi to Madison. My bad
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

Its DJOver

I interpreted it as, if we're already playing Madison, it's just easier to say that's the Gavitt game and call it a day so that we don't have to travel to Madison + another B14 location.  Similar to how the Beast, B12 series worked out.  Our home + home with K-State was announced before the challenge, and there was hope that we would get K-State + another B12 team last year, but the organizers saw that we were already playing and just made the pre-established match-up the official "challenge" one.
Scoop motto:
Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2025, 06:04:29 PMthe stats bear that out, but

Mr. Nielsen

Wojo just said on Homer's Show, that there will be a handful of Big East games played before Jan. 1st.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

Previous topic - Next topic