collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Kam update by MuMark
[Today at 06:12:26 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 05:42:02 PM]


2025 Transfer Portal by Jay Bee
[Today at 05:06:35 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Galway Eagle
[Today at 04:24:46 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by Tha Hound
[Today at 09:02:34 AM]


OT: MU Lax by MU82
[May 01, 2025, 07:27:35 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


jesmu84

Quote from: rocky_warrior on April 01, 2020, 11:08:09 PM
As a single person, you should be able to make about $150k and get your AGI under the cap.  Double that for married folks.  Perhaps a lot more if you're really sophisticated - which I'm not necessarily...

OT - any further tips you want to pass off here or provide direction to resources that would further explain?

Jay Bee

Quote from: rocky_warrior on April 01, 2020, 11:08:09 PM
As a single person, you should be able to make about $150k and get your AGI under the cap.  Double that for married folks.  Perhaps a lot more if you're really sophisticated - which I'm not necessarily...

Wouldn't agree that at $150k "you should be able to get under $100k or you're doing it wrong", but helpful to understand you weren't talking about my situation when you said "....or you're doing it wrong"

Anyway, a lot of people care excluded from this welfare — and the cutoff is such that a lot of people who might "need it" are excluded
The portal is NOT closed.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Jay Bee on April 01, 2020, 11:44:51 PM
Wouldn't agree that at $150k "you should be able to get under $100k or you're doing it wrong", but helpful to understand you weren't talking about my situation when you said "....or you're doing it wrong"

lol, ok.

Quote from: jesmu84 on April 01, 2020, 11:26:30 PM
OT - any further tips you want to pass off here or provide direction to resources that would further explain?

Last I'll say of it here - probably worth a superbar topic, for those smarter than me with other tips.  If you're making that much, obviously take advantage of 401ks, HSA's, and any other "pre tax" deductions you may have access to. 

https://www.thebalance.com/tax-planning-basics-3193487

That's the easy $25k-ish per person.  I'd also argue, that if you make that much, you should be working your way towards investment property.  Just depreciation, insurance and "management" costs offset a lot - all while you're building equity for essentially "free" - cuz renters are generally paying for the place.

https://www.fool.com/millionacres/taxes/real-estate-tax-deductions/how-real-estate-investing-can-reduce-your-tax-bracket/

Alright - I'll save the rest for a superbar topic, where I'm sure others will educate me!

The Sultan

Quote from: GB Warrior on April 01, 2020, 09:52:05 PM
still think they should have just issued across the board. What if my income of, say $125k, is commissions based? Yes, should have saved, yada yada yada, but when the economy freezes, that goes to sh!t.

I also don't think they're done issuing things. What I really don't understand is what political benefit Pelosi seeks to extract from purportedly lifting the SALT cap in the next wave.

The salt cap is just so unpopular in high property tax states.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

real chili 83

I haven't read this thread completely, so sorry if a repeat.

With the fed unemployment benefit of $600 per week, some people will make more gross income on unemployment versus working. 

In MN, the break even point is approximately $70k. At that point you are "better off" working from a gross income perspective.

This will help those who have to pay for benefits out of pocket. I have no idea if that was the intent.

I've had a young single person state they'd volunteer for a layoff   Doing the noble thing?  Or, seeing perceived personal gain? 

I have no idea of this person's real motives.  Does make for some interesting conversation, though.

Frenns Liquor Depot

#155
Quote from: real chili 83 on April 02, 2020, 06:18:41 AM
I haven't read this thread completely, so sorry if a repeat.

With the fed unemployment benefit of $600 per week, some people will make more gross income on unemployment versus working. 

In MN, the break even point is approximately $70k. At that point you are "better off" working from a gross income perspective.

This will help those who have to pay for benefits out of pocket. I have no idea if that was the intent.

I've had a young single person state they'd volunteer for a layoff   Doing the noble thing?  Or, seeing perceived personal gain? 

I have no idea of this person's real motives.  Does make for some interesting conversation, though.

Chili I think there will be many anecdotes of abuse of this law for personal gain (people and corps and govt). 

However, with the massive stoppage in labor that we are having, as a business person and citizen I actually don't care on the people side.  If my goal is to keep as many people employed or spending (or living) as possible to keep the economy on life support while the virus puts people on life support--all the scenarios above are a win.

PS: if all this is short-lived and we have a labor 'shortage' due to generous government benefits, there is a way to fix that.

The Sultan

Quote from: real chili 83 on April 02, 2020, 06:18:41 AM
I haven't read this thread completely, so sorry if a repeat.

With the fed unemployment benefit of $600 per week, some people will make more gross income on unemployment versus working. 

In MN, the break even point is approximately $70k. At that point you are "better off" working from a gross income perspective.

This will help those who have to pay for benefits out of pocket. I have no idea if that was the intent.

I've had a young single person state they'd volunteer for a layoff   Doing the noble thing?  Or, seeing perceived personal gain? 

I have no idea of this person's real motives.  Does make for some interesting conversation, though.


Does it matter what their motives are?  It's three months of enhanced unemployment.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

GB Warrior

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on April 02, 2020, 02:26:05 AM
The salt cap is just so unpopular in high property tax states.

Oh I get it, and it's easy for me to say here in WI vs CA/NY/IL/NJ. But if broad relief is Pelosi's goal, this ain't it. Even in high property tax states, claimants of that deduction who were affected by the cap are predominantly not middle class. Lots are, but a lot are not. 

Frenns Liquor Depot

#158
Quote from: GB Warrior on April 02, 2020, 07:45:07 AM
Oh I get it, and it's easy for me to say here in WI vs CA/NY/IL/NJ. But if broad relief is Pelosi's goal, this ain't it. Even in high property tax states, claimants of that deduction who were affected by the cap are predominantly not middle class. Lots are, but a lot are not.

I am in one of those states and totally agree overall.  The issue is more local though as these govts rely on property tax from the wealthy to fund....the SALT cap has depressed property values and the next reassessment is coming over the next year for many.  Thereby putting pressure on local services (schools, fire, police, etc).

I advocated for what you are saying in the 08/09 downturn (have govt pay % of all mortgage obligations to keep people in their houses) and think its appropriate here too.  Keep the banks running/funded and get as much money to people that will spend it as possible.  Likely the best way to blunt the impact.

MU Fan in Connecticut

Quote from: GB Warrior on April 02, 2020, 07:45:07 AM
Oh I get it, and it's easy for me to say here in WI vs CA/NY/IL/NJ. But if broad relief is Pelosi's goal, this ain't it. Even in high property tax states, claimants of that deduction who were affected by the cap are predominantly not middle class. Lots are, but a lot are not.

I was totally screwed by the SALT cap limitation.  I'm paying more taxes now than previous.  I'm definitely middle class and I disagree about those affected by the cap are predominantly not middle class.  Not true at all.

As someone else said compounding things, I got sales commisions in 2018 that I sure didn't see in 2019.

Jay Bee

Quote from: MU Fan in Connecticut on April 02, 2020, 08:29:55 AM
I was totally screwed by the SALT cap limitation.  I'm paying more taxes now than previous.  I'm definitely middle class and I disagree about those affected by the cap are predominantly not middle class.  Not true at all.

As someone else said compounding things, I got sales commisions in 2018 that I sure didn't see in 2019.

What is middle class? If you make just $100k some on here think you're in an elite class smh
The portal is NOT closed.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Jay Bee on April 01, 2020, 11:44:51 PM
Wouldn't agree that at $150k "you should be able to get under $100k or you're doing it wrong", but helpful to understand you weren't talking about my situation when you said "....or you're doing it wrong"

Anyway, a lot of people care excluded from this welfare — and the cutoff is such that a lot of people who might "need it" are excluded

care vs are

Pakuni

Quote from: Jay Bee on April 02, 2020, 09:06:21 AM
What is middle class? If you make just $100k some on here think you're in an elite class smh

A person who makes $118K is in the top 10 percent.

https://www.investopedia.com/personal-finance/how-much-income-puts-you-top-1-5-10/

forgetful

Quote from: Jay Bee on April 02, 2020, 09:06:21 AM
What is middle class? If you make just $100k some on here think you're in an elite class smh

If you make $100k a year, your take-home pay is likely around $70-75k. If you live in San Fran, the average 1-bedroom apartment cost $4k a month. So before you pay for anything besides a roof over your head, you've spent $48k. You have at most $22-27k for every other aspect of your life.

jesmu84

Quote from: real chili 83 on April 02, 2020, 06:18:41 AM
I haven't read this thread completely, so sorry if a repeat.

With the fed unemployment benefit of $600 per week, some people will make more gross income on unemployment versus working. 

In MN, the break even point is approximately $70k. At that point you are "better off" working from a gross income perspective.

This will help those who have to pay for benefits out of pocket. I have no idea if that was the intent.

I've had a young single person state they'd volunteer for a layoff   Doing the noble thing?  Or, seeing perceived personal gain? 

I have no idea of this person's real motives.  Does make for some interesting conversation, though.

I *thought* the expanded benefits say that you can only receive 100% of your pay up to 75k. You can't actually go over what you make.

Anyone confirm?

The Sultan

Interesting article today how the enhanced unemployment benefits basically green-lighted companies to let go their employees.  In retrospect, it would have been better to just give small businesses (under 300 employees) grants to pay their employees.  Would have cost $500M for three months.

Then companies could have more easily ramped back up as needed versus going through the hassle of applying for benefits, rehiring, etc.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

jesmu84

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on April 02, 2020, 05:38:00 PM
Interesting article today how the enhanced unemployment benefits basically green-lighted companies to let go their employees.  In retrospect, it would have been better to just give small businesses (under 300 employees) grants to pay their employees.  Would have cost $500M for three months.

Then companies could have more easily ramped back up as needed versus going through the hassle of applying for benefits, rehiring, etc.

Aren't small businesses offered loans (that become grants) through the stimulus bill?

The Sultan

Quote from: jesmu84 on April 02, 2020, 06:01:43 PM
Aren't small businesses offered loans (that become grants) through the stimulus bill?

Right but why take out a loan when you can just lay-off people instead.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

jesmu84

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on April 02, 2020, 06:06:48 PM
Right but why take out a loan when you can just lay-off people instead.

Because you care about your employees?

Also, so that when things return to normal you cAn hit the ground running instead of going through a process of hiring to then be at max capacity

GooooMarquette

Quote from: jesmu84 on April 02, 2020, 08:32:53 PM
Because you care about your employees?

Also, so that when things return to normal you cAn hit the ground running instead of going through a process of hiring to then be at max capacity


Yep. And you'd have happier, more dedicated employees.

Pakuni

Quote from: GooooMarquette on April 02, 2020, 08:42:40 PM

Yep. And you'd have happier, more dedicated employees.

And, by some estimates, it costs almost $1,900 for a small business to recruit, hire and train a new employee.

🏀


Lighthouse 84

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on April 02, 2020, 06:06:48 PM
Right but why take out a loan when you can just lay-off people instead.
And if you maintain the employees and payroll, the loan turns into a grant. Win-win.
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

ZiggysFryBoy

Quote from: Pakuni on April 02, 2020, 09:07:25 PM
And, by some estimates, it costs almost $1,900 for a small business to recruit, hire and train a new employee.

That's way low, for most jobs.  $5-10k easy, new hire training, with ramp up time in training.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Retire0 on April 02, 2020, 09:19:48 PM
Here they come!

That'll help pay for the redtube and pornhub.  Not sure I believe that pic at all.  Especially withe the IRS saying they'll start around Apr 13...

Previous topic - Next topic