collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

2025 Transfer Portal by avid1010
[Today at 05:13:09 AM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by DoctorV
[May 01, 2025, 09:37:20 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by pbiflyer
[May 01, 2025, 09:00:46 PM]


OT: MU Lax by MU82
[May 01, 2025, 07:27:35 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Billy Hoyle
[May 01, 2025, 03:04:10 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


The Sultan

Quote from: DomJamesToTheBasket on March 19, 2020, 07:58:23 AM
I had some family and friends think I was crazy for flying back to China last week rather than flying back to America.  Saw this coming a mile away.  The lack of preparation, precaution, and action in America is appalling.  These "leaders" need to start making some unpopular decisions NOW before it's too late.  Stay safe everyone!


My son works in Japan.  Early last week, my wife mentioned that she would like him back here.  I told her he was safer over there.  I think I was right about that.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

MU Fan in Connecticut



MU82

The proposed bailout package for the airlines is immoral.

Here is an industry that for the last 10 years has gotten fat and rich by fleecing Americans for every last cent. Most charge to check luggage, most charge to pick a seat in advance, and some even charge for water and carry-on bags. They have squeezed in seats, making flying unbearably uncomfortable. They have increased penalties for changes and cancellations (or forbid them entirely). They have increased the cost of flying significantly. Executives have gotten rich, and so have shareholders thanks to buybacks and the like.

Now, at the first sign of adversity, they come begging the same people they've been fleecing for a huge handout.

And the shytty thing is that we pretty much have to bail them out for the good of our economy.

'Merica!
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

The Sultan

I am not a big proponent of what Liz Warren is preaching above.

Except for the airlines.  If they want to take another bailout, it should come with strings.  Big ones.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Class71

Quote from: WarriorDad on March 18, 2020, 11:32:35 PM
Hydroxychloroquine


That be the solution

Maybe. Used in China and now France with possibly some success. A pair of HIV drugs developed in the USA have also been used in China with some success if you believe their stats.

New York is just the beginning. If people throughout the country ignore the Fed. Guidelines we will all be at risk. On average for each case 4 more people are infected. Add that to the fact symptoms do not show until 2-15+ days after a person is contagious and we are just now rolling out high volume testing and you get the picture.

This threat is real. Follow the guidelines to the letter. It effects all ages with 50% of all hospital cases in the 20-50 age category.
⛵⛵⛵⛵⛵

GooooMarquette

Quote from: lawdog77 on March 19, 2020, 07:08:35 AM
The tweet:
But multiple patients of mine can't leave the hospital because they're awaiting prior auths from commercial insurers.

Insurance companies are clogging up the system in the middle of a damn pandemic.


Although the insurance is holding up the process, technically the hospital is too. Just treat the patient and fight with the insurance company later.


That it probably what it will come to. But there's a catch - while the hospital may be left to fight for its payment if the company doesn't authorize the inpatient care, the patient may also be left holding the bag for subsequent lower-level treatment (i.e., nursing home assisted living, outpatient). So it's a financial risk for both the hospital and the patient to discharge or transfer without all contractually required authorizations.

IMHO - this is another of those problems Congress could easily solve. Just pass a measure that allows hospitals to transfer patients to lower levels of care (SNF, outpatient or whatever), and require that insurance companies pay with or without normally required authorizations.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: MUfan12 on March 18, 2020, 10:21:42 PM
For sure. But if all these measures go another 2+ months people* are gonna lose their minds.

*Me.

Might want to get into the mindset that you are in military deployment.  You're doing this for everyone and the greater good.

#UnleashSean

Let the airlines burn or limit their scummyness

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: GooooMarquette on March 19, 2020, 09:37:31 AM

That it probably what it will come to. But there's a catch - while the hospital may be left to fight for its payment if the company doesn't authorize the inpatient care, the patient may also be left holding the bag for subsequent lower-level treatment (i.e., nursing home assisted living, outpatient). So it's a financial risk for both the hospital and the patient to discharge or transfer without all contractually required authorizations.

IMHO - this is another of those problems Congress could easily solve. Just pass a measure that allows hospitals to transfer patients to lower levels of care (SNF, outpatient or whatever), and require that insurance companies pay with or without normally required authorizations.

I agree gooo.  I am happy we seem to be mobilizing, but I have yet to see the coordinated response--so piecemail right now.  Step one is getting people to shut it down and we finally got the Dr's out in front to declare the crisis (fauci).  So much more to go.  Get rules out of the way, re-purpose our infrastructure (factories, hotels, military), etc.

Now its time to get the face of the response out there that knows what is in the way of putting all of our countries might behind testing, treatment/therapy, vaccines and eventual return to a new normal.

forgetful

Quote from: WarriorDad on March 18, 2020, 11:32:35 PM
Hydroxychloroquine


That be the solution

The statistics I've seen show a small benefit of hydroxychloroquine, but if used in combination with azithromycin, it seems to be quite effective.

The problem is that they are testing it on so few patients, it is hard to know what it means.

https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelzlin/status/1240352261072498688?fbclid=IwAR2fGTij73XFfT3y9USNEP0IWRqchaHXNhs9ddJHJS3J79FA04E_m92uUmQ

jesmu84


lawdog77

Quote from: GooooMarquette on March 19, 2020, 09:37:31 AM

That it probably what it will come to. But there's a catch - while the hospital may be left to fight for its payment if the company doesn't authorize the inpatient care, the patient may also be left holding the bag for subsequent lower-level treatment (i.e., nursing home assisted living, outpatient). So it's a financial risk for both the hospital and the patient to discharge or transfer without all contractually required authorizations.

IMHO - this is another of those problems Congress could easily solve. Just pass a measure that allows hospitals to transfer patients to lower levels of care (SNF, outpatient or whatever), and require that insurance companies pay with or without normally required authorizations.
This is what I did at my firm before I opened my own firm (revenue cycle). No insurance company is going to withold payment in this time of crisis for this reason. Or I should say, no arbitrator/judge is going to allow it. If it is 5 people this tweet is talking about, discharge them and make room.

Coleman

Zero new cases reported in China yesterday. First time since outbreak.

Undeniably good news for humanity.

We are all in this together.

Galway Eagle

Quote from: forgetful on March 19, 2020, 09:48:12 AM
The statistics I've seen show a small benefit of hydroxychloroquine, but if used in combination with azithromycin, it seems to be quite effective.

The problem is that they are testing it on so few patients, it is hard to know what it means.

https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelzlin/status/1240352261072498688?fbclid=IwAR2fGTij73XFfT3y9USNEP0IWRqchaHXNhs9ddJHJS3J79FA04E_m92uUmQ

Could someone explain why an anti biotic would be useful in fighting a virus? That goes against everything I learned from Scrubs, House and ER lol
Retire Terry Rand's jersey!

Hards Alumni

Quote from: Coleman on March 19, 2020, 10:07:25 AM
Zero new cases reported in China yesterday. First time since outbreak.

Undeniably good news for humanity.

We are all in this together.

There were still cases from people coming into China.  34 new cases... 0 in Hubei. Which is reassuring... If you believe them.  ;)

Hards Alumni

New York State just increased their numbers by 30% today.

So, I guess the testing is finally coming back...

mu03eng

4 patients in ICU in southern MKE suburb including a 23 year old on respirator who are suspected Covid-19 patients
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

forgetful

#1768
Quote from: Galway Eagle on March 19, 2020, 10:10:29 AM
Could someone explain why an anti biotic would be useful in fighting a virus? That goes against everything I learned from Scrubs, House and ER lol

Azithromycin is a bit unique there (probably other macrolides too), they do exhibit some antiviral properties, specifically in bronchial epithelial cells that COVID-19 targets. Weakly antiviral, and shouldn't be used for viral treatments, but this case is a bit unique, where the possible benefit may outweigh the risks. It's also only seen in combination therapies.

There is no known biochemical reason why chloroquine should work either, but it seems to have an effect in combination therapies.

What is likely occurring in the combination therapy is that Azithromycin is interfering with viral replication in targeting of the receptor for cell entry. Chloroquine (and its related compounds) are acting to reduce the inflammatory response, so together they are having some efficacy in reducing the need for hospitalization.

If I were a medical doctor, which I am not, I'd be pretreating patients with CF. that may have been exposed to COVID-19, with this combination. Unlikely to cause harm, and they are particularly at risk of this illness.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: forgetful on March 19, 2020, 10:25:30 AM
Azithromycin is a bit unique there (probably other macrolides too), they do exhibit some antiviral properties, specifically in bronchial epithelial cells that COVID-19 targets. Weakly antiviral, and shouldn't be used for viral treatments, but this case is a bit unique, where the possible benefit may outweigh the risks. It's also only seen in combination therapies.

There is no known biochemical reason why chloroquine should work either, but it seems to have an effect in combination therapies.

Fixed that for ya :-P

The same applies to quite a few treatments, some work and we have no real idea why.

forgetful

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on March 19, 2020, 10:28:43 AM
Fixed that for ya :-P

The same applies to quite a few treatments, some work and we have no real idea why.

Thank you, fixed it and updated with a bit more info.

rocky_warrior

Quote from: Pakuni on March 18, 2020, 07:18:31 PM
Not just old people.

@liamstack: 38% of Coronavirus patients who were sick enough to be hospitalized were were between the ages of 20 and 54. Roughly half of those were between 20 and 44. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/health/coronavirus-young-people.html

Quoting to bump.  Not just a"boomer remover".  Here's the official CDC PR:

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm?s_cid=mm6912e2_w

QuoteAmong 508 (12%) patients known to have been hospitalized, 9% were aged ≥85 years, 26% were aged 65–84 years, 17% were aged 55–64 years, 18% were 45–54 years, and 20% were aged 20–44 years. Less than 1% of hospitalizations were among persons aged ≤19 years (Figure 2). The percentage of persons hospitalized increased with age, from 2%–3% among persons aged ≤9 years, to ≥31% among adults aged ≥85 years. (Table).

Among 121 patients known to have been admitted to an ICU, 7% of cases were reported among adults ≥85 years, 46% among adults aged 65–84 years, 36% among adults aged 45–64 years, and 12% among adults aged 20–44 years (Figure 2). No ICU admissions were reported among persons aged ≤19 years. Percentages of ICU admissions were lowest among adults aged 20–44 years (2%–4%) and highest among adults aged 75–84 years (11%–31%) (Table).

12% of ICU patients are 20-44.  Though, I would prefer they narrow in on that band a little.  Are most closer to 40?  Are there a lot in the 20-35 range?  Good news, if you're ≤ 19, have fun.  Just don't get the rest of us sick.

jesmu84

Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 19, 2020, 10:39:52 AM
Quoting to bump.  Not just a"boomer remover".  Here's the official CDC PR:

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm?s_cid=mm6912e2_w

12% of ICU patients are 20-44.  Though, I would prefer they narrow in on that band a little.  Are most closer to 40?  Are there a lot in the 20-35 range?  Good news, if you're ≤ 19, have fun.  Just don't get the rest of us sick.

Also, of the young patients in severe state, how many are healthy vs with co-morbidities?

#UnleashSean

Quote from: jesmu84 on March 19, 2020, 10:42:10 AM
Also, of the young patients in severe state, how many are healthy vs with co-morbidities?

These are the real stats that are needed.

It's easy enough to say 50 twenty somethings are in the hospital. But what if 49/50 have no immune system?

Jockey

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on March 19, 2020, 08:39:00 AM
I am not a big proponent of what Liz Warren is preaching above.

Except for the airlines.  If they want to take another bailout, it should come with strings.  Big ones.

Just curious. Why do you support companies using taxpayer-funded bailouts to engage in share repurchases?

Previous topic - Next topic