Big East Poll,NET rankings and Team Sheets

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET rankings as of Games of January 25
New Old
8   8   Butler   
12   13   Seton Hall   
14   15   Villanova   
25   25   Marquette   
26   26   Creighton   
53   55   Georgetown   
59   61   Xavier   
66   81   St. John's
67   57   DePaul   
80   80   Providence   

1/25 Team Sheets
MU is on Page 25
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2025,%202020.pdf

[Herman Cain]

Big East Net Rankings as of games of January 26
New Old
9   8   Butler   
12   12   Seton Hall   
14   14   Villanova   
24   26   Creighton   
26   25   Marquette   
53   53   Georgetown
63   59   Xavier   
66   66   St. John's
68   67   DePaul   
79   80   Providence

[Herman Cain]

1/26 Team Sheets
MU is on Page 26

https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2026,%202020.pdf?Mobile=1&Source=%2Fsolutions%2Frpi%2F%5Flayouts%2F15%2Fmobile%2Fmblwikia%2Easpx%3FUrl%3D%252Fsolutions%252Frpi%252FSitePages%252FHome%252Easpx

[Herman Cain]

Big East Poll Rankings January 27
AP
8. Nova
10. The Hall
16. Butler
Others Receiving Votes -Creighton
Coaches
9. The Hall
10.Nova
17.Butler
Others Receiving Votes-Creighton ,MU

[BM1090]

Our team sheet looks pretty good. If Purdue can somehow find their way back into the top 30 it would look great.

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET rankings as of games of January 27
New Old
9   9   Butler
12   12   Seton Hall   
14   14   Villanova   
24   24   Creighton   
26   26   Marquette   
52   53   Georgetown   
63   63   Xavier   
66   68   DePaul   
67   66   St. John's
78   79   Providence

1/27 Team Sheets
MU is on page 26
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2027,%202020.pdf?Mobile=1&Source=%2Fsolutions%2Frpi%2F%5Flayouts%2F15%2Fmobile%2Fmblwikia%2Easpx%3FUrl%3D%252Fsolutions%252Frpi%252FSitePages%252FHome%252Easpx

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET rankings as of games of January 28
New Old
9   9   Butler   
11   14   Villanova   
13   12   Seton Hall   
22   24   Creighton   
26   26   Marquette   
52   52   Georgetown   
61   63   Xavier   
64   66   DePaul   
72   67   St. John's
78   78   Providence
   
1/28 Team Sheets
MU is on page 26
http://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2028,%202020.pdf

[SaveOD238]

Chance for a Quad 1 (albeit 1B) win tonight at Xavier.  Quad 1 losses don't really hurt, but quad 1 wins certainly help.

Would be nice to see Providence move up just three spots and turn that Q3 loss into a Q2.

[Its DJOver]

Chance for a Quad 1 (albeit 1B) win tonight at Xavier.  Quad 1 losses don't really hurt, but quad 1 wins certainly help.

Would be nice to see Providence move up just three spots and turn that Q3 loss into a Q2.

Purdue had a nice chance to move back into Q1 last night, but lost.  Davidson is back into Q2, although by the skin of their teeth.  Those 2 plus Providence are the three biggest to watch and hope for positive movement IMO.

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET Rankings as of games of January 29
New Old
8   9   Butler   
12   11   Villanova   
13   13   Seton Hall   
25   26   Marquette   
26   22   Creighton   
49   52   Georgetown   
58   64   DePaul   
62   61   Xavier   
73   72   St. John's
77   78   Providence   

1/29 Team Sheets
MU is on page 25
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2029,%202020.pdf

[BM1090]

4-5 in Q1 and 4-0 in Q2 is a pretty damn good resume.

[muguru]

4-5 in Q1 and 4-0 in Q2 is a pretty damn good resume.

I was surprised that MU only moved up 1 spot in the NET last night after a Q1 road win. I thought they might even crack the top 20. The thing that probably hurt them is Davidson being back into Q3 after a 4OT loss last night. What a disappointing season they are having. That win for MU before the season started was supposed to look really good. Unfortunately not so much.

[SaveOD238]

4-5 in Q1 and 4-0 in Q2 is a pretty damn good resume.

I'd prefer 4-1 in Q2 with a clean slate in Q3 and Q4 to what we have now.  Come on Providence!

[JamilJaeJamailJrJuan]

I'd prefer 4-1 in Q2 with a clean slate in Q3 and Q4 to what we have now.  Come on Providence!

We'll survive that loss, but it does hurt.  Things look so much better at 6-3 (16-5) without that crummy home loss. 

[Herman Cain]

I was surprised that MU only moved up 1 spot in the NET last night after a Q1 road win. I thought they might even crack the top 20. The thing that probably hurt them is Davidson being back into Q3 after a 4OT loss last night. What a disappointing season they are having. That win for MU before the season started was supposed to look really good. Unfortunately not so much.

NCAA has not published any formula. They say the model is designed to be predictive in nature and that as the year goes by it becomes more accurate.

As far the team sheets go, I agree that the Davidson win is not going to be doing much for us. We just have to keep building our resume in the remaining Big East games. Committee has consistently said in the interview after the tournament picks are announced , that they give a lot of weighting to the number of quality wins a team has been able to achieve.

[BM1090]

NCAA has not published any formula. They say the model is designed to be predictive in nature and that as the year goes by it becomes more accurate.

As far the team sheets go, I agree that the Davidson win is not going to be doing much for us. We just have to keep building our resume in the remaining Big East games. Committee has consistently said in the interview after the tournament picks are announced , that they give a lot of weighting to the number of quality wins a team has been able to achieve.

On the flip side, the USC win looks better than anyone could have anticipated.

[shoothoops]

Friday January 31, Marquette is now 22 in NCAA Net Rankings.

[lurch91]

Friday January 31, Marquette is now 22 in NCAA Net Rankings.

Ridiculous!! Don't they know Wojo can't coach and our team won every game due to luck??

[MU82]

I was surprised that MU only moved up 1 spot in the NET last night after a Q1 road win. I thought they might even crack the top 20. The thing that probably hurt them is Davidson being back into Q3 after a 4OT loss last night. What a disappointing season they are having. That win for MU before the season started was supposed to look really good. Unfortunately not so much.

Davidson having a much worse season than I thought. Good team last year, with most key players returning and a fine coach. But they lost two guys early on, and their best players - including the returning A10 POY - are having mediocre seasons. Sucks for them ... and for us! K-State also has not had as good a season as I thought they would.

But as BM1090 pointed out, USC is having a better-than-expected season. Plus, every time it looks like Purdue is cooked, they pull off a huge win or two.

Pretty happy with a NET of 22, considering everything.

[tower912]

Ridiculous!! Don't they know Wojo can't coach and our team won every game due to luck??

Clearly, NET is a delusional pro-jo-er. 

[Tha Hound]

*Eye emoji*

[Herman Cain]

Big East Net Rankings as of games of January 30
New Old
8   8   Butler   
13   12   Villanova   
14   13   Seton Hall   
22   25   Marquette   
25   26   Creighton   
49   49   Georgetown   
59   58   DePaul   
63   62   Xavier
73   73   St. John's
78   77   Providence   

1/30 Team Sheets
MU is on page 22
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20Jan.%2030,%202020.pdf?Mobile=1&Source=%2Fsolutions%2Frpi%2F%5Flayouts%2F15%2Fmobile%2Fmblwikia%2Easpx%3FUrl%3D%252fsolutions%252frpi%252fSitePages%252fHome%2Easpx%26wdFCCState%3D1

[fjm]

Friday January 31, Marquette is now 22 in NCAA Net Rankings.

Classic Wojo. Intentionally demotivating his team and encouraging weak fouls to get us to a 22 ranking. Boo

[Goose]

Serious question, what seeding would that give us if the season ended today?

[Galway Eagle]

Serious question, what seeding would that give us if the season ended today?

22 on net means a 6, maybe a 7 if they had to adjust locations.