Big East Poll,NET rankings and Team Sheets

[Herman Cain]

Big East Net Rankings as of games of March 9
New Old
11   11   Creighton   
13   13   Villanova   
15   15   Seton Hall   
19   19   Butler   
26   26   Marquette   
37   36   Providence   
45   44   Xavier   
62   62   Georgetown   
68   66   St. John's
87   86   DePaul

[Herman Cain]

3/9 Team Sheets
MU is on page 26
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Stats%20Library/NET%20Team%20Sheets%20-%20March%209,%202020.pdf?Mobile=1&Source=%2Fsolutions%2Frpi%2F%5Flayouts%2F15%2Fmobile%2Fmblwikia%2Easpx%3FUrl%3D%252Fsolutions%252Frpi%252FSitePages%252FHome%252Easpx

[bilsu]

Big East Net Rankings as of games of March 9
New Old
11   11   Creighton   
13   13   Villanova   
15   15   Seton Hall   
19   19   Butler   
26   26   Marquette   
37   36   Providence   
45   44   Xavier   
62   62   Georgetown   
68   66   St. John's
87   86   DePaul

The fact that MU is 26th and Providence is 37th shows how bad a metric this is.

[lawdog77]

The fact that MU is 26th and Providence is 37th shows how bad a metric this is.

They are cleary playing better over the last 18 games. Before.that, they were horrible. 2-3 in Q3 games

[JamilJaeJamailJrJuan]

The fact that MU is 26th and Providence is 37th shows how bad a metric this is.

Every game matters.  Its not a metric designed to rank teams as they stand today.  Its a metric built to measure the overall body of work of a team over the course of the entire season. 

[jesmu84]

The fact that MU is 26th and Providence is 37th shows how bad a metric this is.

It's not the end all, be all. Look where the 2 are currently protected in the bracket

[Lennys Tap]

The fact that MU is 26th and Providence is 37th shows how bad a metric this is.

Agree. When it didn't matter much, they sucked and we were good. Now that it matters most, they're good and we suck. If you count November and December as much as February and March the numbers say we're better. Of course they, we and everybody else knows that's ridiculous.

[BM1090]

Agree. When it didn't matter much, they sucked and we were good. Now that it matters most, they're good and we suck. If you count November and December as much as February and March the numbers say we're better. Of course they, we and everybody else knows that's ridiculous.

Everything matters equally up until the tournaments start.

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET rankings as of games of March 10
New Old
11   11   Creighton   
13   13   Villanova   
15   15   Seton Hall   
19   19   Butler   
26   26   Marquette   
37   37   Providence   
45   45   Xavier   
62   62   Georgetown   
67   68   St. John's
88   87   DePaul

[CTWarrior]

Everything matters equally up until the tournaments start.

I basically agree that is how the NCAA should do it.  Tournament should be a reward for the season's body of work.  I would much rather play us than Providence, though.  Otherwise, the rankings make sense.

[Lennys Tap]

Everything matters equally up until the tournaments start.

To the committee, yes. In reality, no.

[Herman Cain]

Big East NET rankings as of games of March 11
New Old
11   11   Creighton   
13   13   Villanova   
15   15   Seton Hall   
19   19   Butler   
26   26   Marquette   
37   37   Providence   
47   45   Xavier   
62   67   St. John's
65   62   Georgetown   
86   88   DePaul

[WarriorFan]

4 in the top 20 and all in the top 100.  Great conference and happy to be in it.

[MarquetteMike1977]

Big East NET rankings as of games of March 11
New Old
11   11   Creighton   
13   13   Villanova   
15   15   Seton Hall   
19   19   Butler   
26   26   Marquette   
37   37   Providence   
47   45   Xavier   
62   67   St. John's
65   62   Georgetown   
86   88   DePaul

Lunardi had Marquette as a 9 seed playing Houston in Omaha in his last Bracketology