collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: NIT . . . too early?  (Read 18019 times)

warriorfred

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1010
NIT . . . too early?
« on: March 08, 2018, 07:48:46 PM »
I suppose Marquette could make the NCAA Tournament, but their resume leans NIT.  The blowout loss to Villanova doesn't help.

In all honesty, they don't look like a NCAA Tournament team to me.

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2018, 07:53:28 PM »
I suppose Marquette could make the NCAA Tournament, but their resume leans NIT.  The blowout loss to Villanova doesn't help.

In all honesty, they don't look like a NCAA Tournament team to me.

Nope...once they lost to DePaul two weeks ago, it was over..that was pretty obvious.
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

Its DJOver

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3085
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2018, 07:54:15 PM »
Nope...once they lost to DePaul two weeks ago, it was over..that was pretty obvious.
Because you're on the selection committee
I'll stick with my opinion on Gold.  He'll be in foul trouble within the first eight minutes.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2018, 07:54:31 PM »
This resume would have been a NCAA lock any of the past 10 years. I wouldn't write this team off yet.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

NickelDimer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4587
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2018, 07:55:14 PM »
Does anyone else picture guru screaming into his pillow with tears streaming down his face?
No Finish Line

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2018, 07:57:09 PM »
I suppose Marquette could make the NCAA Tournament, but their resume leans NIT.  The blowout loss to Villanova doesn't help.

In all honesty, they don't look like a NCAA Tournament team to me.


Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

My guess is Dayton at best though.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23865
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2018, 07:59:47 PM »

Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

My guess is Dayton at best though.

Stupid truth. 
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

warriorfred

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1010
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2018, 08:00:00 PM »
I don't blame anyone for looking at the DePaul loss and wondering what might have been?  That was probably the deciding game in the home stretch.

The thing of it is that I look at this year's Marquette team and on the balance they do not look like a typical NCAA tournament team.  The close loss to Villanova and the blowout win over Seton Hall says "yes."  But the loss to DePaul and St John's says "no."

I wear blue and gold glasses, but i am not seeing it.


#UnleashSean

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2018, 08:00:33 PM »

Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

They don't have that top 10 win though =/. That's what got them in last year. It'll be close this year

My guess is Dayton at best though.

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2018, 08:01:08 PM »
I don't blame anyone for looking at the DePaul loss and wondering what might have been?  That was probably the deciding game in the home stretch.

The thing of it is that I look at this year's Marquette team and on the balance they do not look like a typical NCAA tournament team.  The close loss to Villanova and the blowout win over Seton Hall says "yes."  But the loss to DePaul and St John's says "no."

I wear blue and gold glasses, but i am not seeing it.

They're young!!!
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

warriorfred

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1010
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2018, 08:02:07 PM »

Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

My guess is Dayton at best though.

I didn't know that.  But last year's team seemed better on a certain level.  I am having difficulty describing it.  Maybe because there was no "signature" win this year.

Its DJOver

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3085
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2018, 08:02:23 PM »
They're young!!!
That's no excuse for you guru. Shoulda won by 20, no excuse
I'll stick with my opinion on Gold.  He'll be in foul trouble within the first eight minutes.

cheese ball chaser

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2018, 08:02:50 PM »
The lesson of this season is don't lose to DePaul

GoldenZebra

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2018, 08:03:35 PM »
Look at all these bracketologists come out of the woodwork. We'll see sunday.

MattyWarrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1655
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2018, 08:03:55 PM »
No consistency all year, outside of some record games by the midgets,another what could have been year.   

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2018, 08:04:14 PM »
Only post I am going to make in here tonight.

Not all is lost. We still have a chance. 50/50 proposition.

Beating Nova was always a prayer. That’s the best team in the country.

We’ll see what Sunday brings. Dayton wouldn’t surprise me.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

chapman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5746
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2018, 08:04:45 PM »
Could be a 1 seed, maybe a 2.  Close down the BC with two, maybe three more?

Mr. Nielsen

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5455
  • Facts don't care about your feelings!
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2018, 08:05:28 PM »

Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

My guess is Dayton at best though.
Good stat.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

warriorfred

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1010
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2018, 08:07:19 PM »
Only post I am going to make in here tonight.

Not all is lost. We still have a chance. 50/50 proposition.

Beating Nova was always a prayer. That’s the best team in the country.

We’ll see what Sunday brings. Dayton wouldn’t surprise me.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Warriors make the NCAA.  But it doesn't feel that way.

injuryBug

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2018, 08:11:24 PM »
I wish people would actually look at the teams around us before they say such stupid stuff.  Every team around us has a DePaul loss. do some research instead of acting stupid
Alabama has 3 depaul type losses
Bonnies have 3 as well and they are in by most

muguru

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5556
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2018, 08:11:39 PM »

Do you realize that MU will have the same record this year as they did last year?  Against a tougher schedule?

The RPI of this team is actually better than last year's.

My guess is Dayton at best though.

Well hell...let's celebrate!!! 19-13 seasons and being a bubble team, or barely getting in the tourney..Wahoo! That's awesome stuff...but oh yeah, that shows improvement! NEXT year is THE year!
“Being realistic is the most common path to mediocrity.” Will Smith

We live in a society that rewards mediocrity , I detest mediocrity - David Goggi

I want this quote to serve as a reminder to the vast majority of scoop posters in regards to the MU BB program.

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6084
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2018, 08:11:57 PM »
I don't blame anyone for looking at the DePaul loss and wondering what might have been?  That was probably the deciding game in the home stretch.

The thing of it is that I look at this year's Marquette team and on the balance they do not look like a typical NCAA tournament team.  The close loss to Villanova and the blowout win over Seton Hall says "yes."  But the loss to DePaul and St John's says "no."

I wear blue and gold glasses, but i am not seeing it.

I realize it's a meaningless point, but St. J had the ability to knock off Duke and Nova. I don't mind that loss.

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6084
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2018, 08:12:35 PM »
Well hell...let's celebrate!!! 19-13 seasons and being a bubble team, or barely getting in the tourney..Wahoo! That's awesome stuff...but oh yeah, that shows improvement! NEXT year is THE year!

It literally does show improvement.

You're dense.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
  • Js for days
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #23 on: March 08, 2018, 08:13:26 PM »
Well hell...let's celebrate!!! 19-13 seasons and being a bubble team, or barely getting in the tourney..Wahoo! That's awesome stuff...but oh yeah, that shows improvement! NEXT year is THE year!

You’re an idiot dude. I’m sorry. But go root for Duke. That’s the only team worthy of your fandom.
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Its DJOver

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3085
Re: NIT . . . too early?
« Reply #24 on: March 08, 2018, 08:14:49 PM »
Same record as last year. Better rpi too. FAR younger team, and people still think we underachieved
I'll stick with my opinion on Gold.  He'll be in foul trouble within the first eight minutes.

 

feedback