collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NCAA Tournament expansion as early as next season. by brewcity77
[Today at 03:02:43 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 02:42:57 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by mileskishnish72
[Today at 01:39:45 PM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by Jay Bee
[Today at 10:33:57 AM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 10:17:40 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MUDPT
[June 06, 2025, 10:08:35 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by Uncle Rico
[June 06, 2025, 04:29:28 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Earl Tatum

Whoopee! Here I thought Quentin Grimes verbaled to MU.

jsglow

Quote from: The Lens on August 15, 2017, 12:45:37 PM
I think you're overestimating Marquette's importance as a player in Milwaukee.  IMO we are an incredible but often times underappreciated contributor.  I do not think the Bucks are concerned about our importance at all.

Okay, we disagree.  Let's say the Bucks play ridiculous hardball and literally force MU into the 'B' tenant slot at the Arena as an extreme example.  You think the WI political leaders on both sides of the aisle would take kindly to that?  You think Bucks suite sales remain the same? You think the Journal Sentinel doesn't splash that and denounce these guys repeatedly for failing to 'support the community'?  You think Gov. Walker doesn't have a little chat with his new buddy Terry Gou? 

I'm not saying that Lasry and Edens give a rat's behind about us.  There's no doubt the relationship has soured. But they do care about their own image and business prospects and I'm simply saying they aren't stupid. The relationship will remain publicly cordial and business-like, just like today.

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: jsglow on August 15, 2017, 01:12:24 PM
Okay, we disagree.  Let's say the Bucks play ridiculous hardball and literally force MU into the 'B' tenant slot at the Arena as an extreme example.  You think the WI political leaders on both sides of the aisle would take kindly to that? 

I think WI political leaders kinda sorta of care about MU like they kinda sorta care about UW-Fond du Lac.

mu03eng

Quote from: jsglow on August 15, 2017, 01:12:24 PM
Okay, we disagree.  Let's say the Bucks play ridiculous hardball and literally force MU into the 'B' tenant slot at the Arena as an extreme example.  You think the WI political leaders on both sides of the aisle would take kindly to that?  You think Bucks suite sales remain the same? You think the Journal Sentinel doesn't splash that and denounce these guys repeatedly for failing to 'support the community'?  You think Gov. Walker doesn't have a little chat with his new buddy Terry Gou? 

I'm not saying that Lasry and Edens give a rat's behind about us.  There's no doubt the relationship has soured. But they do care about their own image and business prospects and I'm simply saying they aren't stupid. The relationship will remain publicly cordial and business-like, just like today.

Glow, I think you underestimate how little the Bucks (Lasry, Edens, and especially Feigen) care for Wisconsin politics of either party. I think you are correct, that they are going to do what it takes to keep a "clean" image in the community, but ultimately they are going to be a real pain to deal with behind the scenes because they have all the leverage now that they have their stadium.
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

We R Final Four

Quote from: jsglow on August 15, 2017, 01:12:24 PM
Okay, we disagree.  Let's say the Bucks play ridiculous hardball and literally force MU into the 'B' tenant slot at the Arena as an extreme example.  You think the WI political leaders on both sides of the aisle would take kindly to that?  You think Bucks suite sales remain the same? You think the Journal Sentinel doesn't splash that and denounce these guys repeatedly for failing to 'support the community'?  You think Gov. Walker doesn't have a little chat with his new buddy Terry Gou? 

I'm not saying that Lasry and Edens give a rat's behind about us.  There's no doubt the relationship has soured. But they do care about their own image and business prospects and I'm simply saying they aren't stupid. The relationship will remain publicly cordial and business-like, just like today.
I think you are really overestimating Marquette's importance as a player in Milwaukee.

dgies9156

Yikes.

I think everyone in here is too Wisconsin-centric. Period. Of course, the Bucks owners are from out-of-state. That doesn't make them evil except, perhaps, in Wisconsin.  They drove a tough bargain with Marquette because they could. They did not do anything that any of us under the same circumstances wouldn't do.

The Bucks took their negotiating advantage and leveraged it to no end. We can either play at the Arena, without the suite revenue and with 4,000 to 7,000 unfulfilled fans a game, or we can sign on the line.

Eventually, we could build an on-campus arena of our own but don't expect me as a contributing alum to support or contribute to it. Marquette has other needs, including scholarships that enable qualified students to attend Marquette. With that coming tuition hike, they're going to need all the scholarship support they can get.

Ellenson Guerrero

Sounds like it might have made a little sense to put a little money up front in order to buy some equity in the arena.  The state would have jumped all over that. 
"What we take for-granted, others pray for..." - Brent Williams 3/30/14

Herman Cain

Quote from: mu03eng on August 15, 2017, 01:22:24 PM
Glow, I think you underestimate how little the Bucks (Lasry, Edens, and especially Feigen) care for Wisconsin politics of either party. I think you are correct, that they are going to do what it takes to keep a "clean" image in the community, but ultimately they are going to be a real pain to deal with behind the scenes because they have all the leverage now that they have their stadium.
I have had dealings with the Bucks owners in the business world and they are an unsavory sort. Everything to them is dollars and cents and words in contracts, while there is nothing wrong with that, they could care less about Milwaukee.  The way they look at it ,the Bucks were an NBA franchise available at a discount, and they made the deal.  Their whole mode was to get the new arena built and then position the franchise for sale to the group from Seattle.  I look for that to happen about 5-7 years from now.

Knowing these guys as well as I do, we will be their new best friends about the time they go to sell the franchise. They will need a good tenant to absorb some of the rent they have committed to on their end.

We should forget the athletic research center and start raising money now to build our own arena on that site. The beauty is we control that land and the last I looked the footprint was big enough to put in an arena similar in size to BMO Harris Bradley.  I would gladly donate to that effort .

"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

mu03eng

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 01:43:15 PM
I have had dealings with the Bucks owners in the business world and they are an unsavory sort. Everything to them is dollars and cents and words in contracts, while there is nothing wrong with that, they could care less about Milwaukee.  The way they look at it ,the Bucks were an NBA franchise available at a discount, and they made the deal.  Their whole mode was to get the new arena built and then position the franchise for sale to the group from Seattle.  I look for that to happen about 5-7 years from now.

Knowing these guys as well as I do, we will be their new best friends about the time they go to sell the franchise. They will need a good tenant to absorb some of the rent they have committed to on their end.

We should forget the athletic research center and start raising money now to build our own arena on that site. The beauty is we control that land and the last I looked the footprint was big enough to put in an arena similar in size to BMO Harris Bradley.  I would gladly donate to that effort .

They ain't selling the franchise, not only is it going to make them money hand over foot for the next 10 years but it's a huge ego play for them to be one of thirty owners in the NBA. And just watch what the Rockets go for, they'll use that valuation to leverage even more funds for whatever side ventures they want without having to liquidate capital via sale of the team.

Everything else you have is just put tinfoil hattery. The athletic research center is going to be one of the things that puts MU on the map for all the expense it's going to be. Like it or not MU has decided they want to be the Dartmouth of the midwest and having such a signature research program is critical to that plan.
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

Newsdreams

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 01:43:15 PM
I have had dealings with the Bucks owners in the business world and they are an unsavory sort. Everything to them is dollars and cents and words in contracts, while there is nothing wrong with that, they could care less about Milwaukee.  The way they look at it ,the Bucks were an NBA franchise available at a discount, and they made the deal.  Their whole mode was to get the new arena built and then position the franchise for sale to the group from Seattle.  I look for that to happen about 5-7 years from now.

Knowing these guys as well as I do, we will be their new best friends about the time they go to sell the franchise. They will need a good tenant to absorb some of the rent they have committed to on their end.

We should forget the athletic research center and start raising money now to build our own arena on that site. The beauty is we control that land and the last I looked the footprint was big enough to put in an arena similar in size to BMO Harris Bradley.  I would gladly donate to that effort .
LOL  :o
Goal is National Championship
CBP profile my people who landed here over 100 yrs before Mayflower. Most I've had to deal with are ignorant & low IQ.
Can't believe we're living in the land of F 452/1984/Animal Farm/Brave New World/Handmaid's Tale. When travel to Mars begins, expect Starship Troopers

Benny B

Quote from: mu03eng on August 15, 2017, 01:50:17 PM
Like it or not MU has decided they want to be the Dartmouth of the midwest and having such a signature research program is critical to that plan.

If it means being in the same conference as the Harvard of the Midwest, I'll pass.

Can't we be the Stanford of the Midwest instead?
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

The Lens

Quote from: mu_hilltopper on August 15, 2017, 01:17:05 PM
I think WI political leaders kinda sorta of care about MU like they kinda sorta care about UW-Fond du Lac.

Barry Alvarez and Bo Ryan completely flipped the script on our perception in this state.  Badgers athletics is a strong #2 behind only the Packers.   Certainly we have alums in top places but the University of Wisconsin has never been healthier in all facets. 

I think they could have pushed us out and it only would have hurt their rental revenues.  I think otherwise it would have been a blip.
The Teal Train has left the station and Lens is day drinking in the bar car.    ---- Dr. Blackheart

History is so valuable if you have the humility to learn from it.    ---- Shaka Smart

warriorchick

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 01:43:15 PM

We should forget the athletic research center and start raising money now to build our own arena on that site. The beauty is we control that land and the last I looked the footprint was big enough to put in an arena similar in size to BMO Harris Bradley.  I would gladly donate to that effort .

Should we do this before or after we cut the freshman class in half to improve our acceptance rate?
Have some patience, FFS.

Herman Cain

Quote from: mu03eng on August 15, 2017, 01:50:17 PM
They ain't selling the franchise, not only is it going to make them money hand over foot for the next 10 years but it's a huge ego play for them to be one of thirty owners in the NBA. And just watch what the Rockets go for, they'll use that valuation to leverage even more funds for whatever side ventures they want without having to liquidate capital via sale of the team.

Everything else you have is just put tinfoil hattery. The athletic research center is going to be one of the things that puts MU on the map for all the expense it's going to be. Like it or not MU has decided they want to be the Dartmouth of the midwest and having such a signature research program is critical to that plan.
Yes they are watching what the Rockets go for and carefully positioning themselves for a similar sale.  They are not going to be able to leverage the Franchise value because of a lack of cashflow. Also ,remember they have local partners in the deal,  so they dont have full access to the cashflow to re leverage.  Only way to get money out is to sell it.   I agree it is an ego play, but for these guys the ego plays don't get in the way of making money.  Remember neither one of the primary owners ever built a business, they were just financial arbitrage guys who were smart enough to not make too many bad trades. I have had lots of dealings with sports franchise owners in NFL, NBA and MLB over the years and they fall into two camps. One is the camp that loves the team etc and wants to be a long term holder.  People like the Mara family. The second are opportunists. These guys clearly fall into the second grouping. Nothing wrong with that. Just know the animal when I see it.

The athletic research center was just a mechanism to get an indoor playing field for Soccer and Lacrosse. The early solid success of Lacrosse was leveraged into getting the bubble on Valley Fields and that is working well now. T We can knock down the old gym and make that an athletic research center. he only comparability we have to Dartmouth is the percentage of students drinking.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

avid1010

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 02:18:00 PM
Yes they are watching what the Rockets go for and carefully positioning themselves for a similar sale.  They are not going to be able to leverage the Franchise value because of a lack of cashflow. Also ,remember they have local partners in the deal,  so they dont have full access to the cashflow to re leverage.  Only way to get money out is to sell it.   I agree it is an ego play, but for these guys the ego plays don't get in the way of making money.  Remember neither one of the primary owners ever built a business, they were just financial arbitrage guys who were smart enough to not make too many bad trades. I have had lots of dealings with sports franchise owners in NFL, NBA and MLB over the years and they fall into two camps. One is the camp that loves the team etc and wants to be a long term holder.  People like the Mara family. The second are opportunists. These guys clearly fall into the second grouping. Nothing wrong with that. Just know the animal when I see it.

The athletic research center was just a mechanism to get an indoor playing field for Soccer and Lacrosse. The early solid success of Lacrosse was leveraged into getting the bubble on Valley Fields and that is working well now. T We can knock down the old gym and make that an athletic research center. he only comparability we have to Dartmouth is the percentage of students drinking.
you're so full of sh!t.  herb kohl knew their intentions better than you...

mu03eng

Quote from: Benny B on August 15, 2017, 01:56:02 PM
If it means being in the same conference as the Harvard of the Midwest, I'll pass.

Can't we be the Stanford of the Midwest instead?

"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

wadesworld

Quote from: avid1010 on August 15, 2017, 02:23:10 PM
you're so full of sh!t.  herb kohl knew their intentions better than you...

In the words of Pardon My Take, "Uhh, no duh!"

mu03eng

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 02:18:00 PM
Yes they are watching what the Rockets go for and carefully positioning themselves for a similar sale.  They are not going to be able to leverage the Franchise value because of a lack of cashflow. Also ,remember they have local partners in the deal,  so they dont have full access to the cashflow to re leverage.  Only way to get money out is to sell it.   I agree it is an ego play, but for these guys the ego plays don't get in the way of making money.  Remember neither one of the primary owners ever built a business, they were just financial arbitrage guys who were smart enough to not make too many bad trades. I have had lots of dealings with sports franchise owners in NFL, NBA and MLB over the years and they fall into two camps. One is the camp that loves the team etc and wants to be a long term holder.  People like the Mara family. The second are opportunists. These guys clearly fall into the second grouping. Nothing wrong with that. Just know the animal when I see it.

The athletic research center was just a mechanism to get an indoor playing field for Soccer and Lacrosse. The early solid success of Lacrosse was leveraged into getting the bubble on Valley Fields and that is working well now. T We can knock down the old gym and make that an athletic research center. he only comparability we have to Dartmouth is the percentage of students drinking.

I'd be willing to wager you some amount of money to a charity of your choice if I'm wrong(vice versa if you are) about the Bucks still being in Milwaukee 7 years from now.

Here's mine:
http://specialops.org/
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

bilsu

Quote from: jsglow on August 15, 2017, 01:12:24 PM
Okay, we disagree.  Let's say the Bucks play ridiculous hardball and literally force MU into the 'B' tenant slot at the Arena as an extreme example.  You think the WI political leaders on both sides of the aisle would take kindly to that?  You think Bucks suite sales remain the same? You think the Journal Sentinel doesn't splash that and denounce these guys repeatedly for failing to 'support the community'?  You think Gov. Walker doesn't have a little chat with his new buddy Terry Gou? 

I'm not saying that Lasry and Edens give a rat's behind about us.  There's no doubt the relationship has soured. But they do care about their own image and business prospects and I'm simply saying they aren't stupid. The relationship will remain publicly cordial and business-like, just like today.
I think in general nobody would care (outside of MU fans) unless it resulted in the Buck's needing more public money to offset the MU rent they did not get.

5DollarPitcher

This might not be the standard opinion around here, but I have no doubt that Marquette got what they wanted out of this deal as well.  I'm sure these "rough, tough New Yorkers" tightened the screws on MU somewhat.  However, I also believe MU has lawyers and negotiators better than money can buy.  I'm a big Bucks fan and, while these new owners have done a lot of positive for the team, they rub me the wrong way in how they handle almost everything.

jsglow

Quote from: bilsu on August 15, 2017, 02:49:54 PM
I think in general nobody would care (outside of MU fans) unless it resulted in the Buck's needing more public money to offset the MU rent they did not get.

That's actually one good thing about the new Bucks deal relative to their current situation in the BMO BC.  They actually do owe a 7 figure check to the governing authority every year.  Now is it 'market'? Heck no.  But it's not zero like now.

mu03eng

Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on August 15, 2017, 03:07:17 PM
This might not be the standard opinion around here, but I have no doubt that Marquette got what they wanted out of this deal as well.  I'm sure these "rough, tough New Yorkers" tightened the screws on MU somewhat.  However, I also believe MU has lawyers and negotiators better than money can buy.  I'm a big Bucks fan and, while these new owners have done a lot of positive for the team, they rub me the wrong way in how they handle almost everything.

MU got what it needed, but certainly not what it wanted. It's not a reflection on MU's intelligence or ability, but if you don't hold the leverage there is only so much you can do. MU needs the Bucks more than they need MU, so the deal balances out that way.

C'est la vie
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

GGGG

Quote from: Jackie Moon on August 15, 2017, 01:43:15 PM
I have had dealings with the Bucks owners in the business world and they are an unsavory sort. Everything to them is dollars and cents and words in contracts, while there is nothing wrong with that, they could care less about Milwaukee.  The way they look at it ,the Bucks were an NBA franchise available at a discount, and they made the deal.  Their whole mode was to get the new arena built and then position the franchise for sale to the group from Seattle.  I look for that to happen about 5-7 years from now.

Knowing these guys as well as I do, we will be their new best friends about the time they go to sell the franchise. They will need a good tenant to absorb some of the rent they have committed to on their end.

We should forget the athletic research center and start raising money now to build our own arena on that site. The beauty is we control that land and the last I looked the footprint was big enough to put in an arena similar in size to BMO Harris Bradley.  I would gladly donate to that effort .


First of all, I think it is safe to say that you have never dealt with the owners of the Bucks.

Second, the Bucks have a 30 year lease with the WCD.  Good luck getting out of that in 5-7 years.

jsglow

Quote from: mu03eng on August 15, 2017, 03:11:27 PM
MU got what it needed, but certainly not what it wanted. It's not a reflection on MU's intelligence or ability, but if you don't hold the leverage there is only so much you can do. MU needs the Bucks more than they need MU, so the deal balances out that way.

C'est la vie

And Eng, you simply have to remember that they would have been negotiating with Herb and/or Marc in the past.  New world brother.  It worked out.  It was always going to.

5DollarPitcher

Quote from: Sultan of Slap O' Fivin' on August 15, 2017, 03:13:16 PM

First of all, I think it is safe to say that you have never dealt with the owners of the Bucks.

Second, the Bucks have a 30 year lease with the WCD.  Good luck getting out of that in 5-7 years.
I believe there was an actual clause in the deal these two struck with Kohl that said if they attempted to sell the team or relocate, they would lose control of the team.

Previous topic - Next topic