collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

[Paint Touches] Big East programs ranked by NBA representation by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[Today at 12:00:10 AM]


So....What are we ranked on Monday - 11/1/2024? by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[April 28, 2024, 11:58:04 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by MU82
[April 28, 2024, 09:55:19 PM]


Banquet by Skatastrophy
[April 28, 2024, 06:50:03 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[April 28, 2024, 06:37:34 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by MU82
[April 28, 2024, 06:32:11 PM]


D-I Logo Quiz by SoCalEagle
[April 28, 2024, 01:23:01 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?  (Read 55818 times)

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10464
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #275 on: April 09, 2018, 11:35:32 AM »
An animal nickname is usually chosen for the association to strength or ferocity, to inspire both athletes and fans. Examples include Wolverines, Tigers, Bears, Huskies, etc. There is nothing fierce or strong about an Anteater. They look ridiculous. I'll take Golden Eagles over Anteaters any day.

Uniqueness isn't that important in a nickname. There's a reason we don't see teams named the Naked Mole Rats, Sea Lampreys or the Pink Fairy Armadillos.

Tell that to the thousands of ants that have lost their lives to the terrifying anteater
Maigh Eo for Sam

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22163
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #276 on: April 09, 2018, 11:38:51 AM »
What's terrifying about ducks,  beavers,  or banana slugs?
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2674
  • Retire #34
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #277 on: April 09, 2018, 11:52:29 AM »
What's terrifying about ducks,  beavers,  or banana slugs?

"Ducks" and "Beavers" have connections to the state of Oregon.  Beavers because Oregon is the Beaver State, Ducks actually evolved from "Webfoots" originally applied to a group of fishermen from the coast of Massachusetts who had been heroes during the American Revolutionary War. When their descendants settled in Oregon's Willamette Valley in the 19th century.  The student body voted for "Webfoots" but over time the media began referring to them as "Ducks" and it stuck.

Banana Slugs was voted in as a joke by the UCSC students.

Look at others. A "Buckeye" is a kind of acorn.  A "Hoosier" is merely a resident of Indiana (and a derogatory term for certain people in Illinois and Missouri). An "Aggie" is merely a nickname for students at an agricultural school. Golden Gophers derives from Minnesota being nicknamed as "the Gopher State" by a political cartoonist. Cornhuskers? Boilermakers? Terrapins? Blue Jays? None of those names are particularly "terrifying" but they work.  In the end, it's the name of the university that matters.

The most "terrifying' name in the Big East may be the Blue Demons. How's that working out for DePaul in instilling fear and terror in opponents?
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #278 on: April 09, 2018, 12:00:03 PM »
What's terrifying about ducks,  beavers,  or banana slugs?

A fisherman in Belarus was bitten to death by a beaver, and all he was doing was trying to take its picture.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/11/newser-beaver-kills-man/2074145/

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10464
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #279 on: April 09, 2018, 12:02:35 PM »
"Ducks" and "Beavers" have connections to the state of Oregon.  Beavers because Oregon is the Beaver State, Ducks actually evolved from "Webfoots" originally applied to a group of fishermen from the coast of Massachusetts who had been heroes during the American Revolutionary War. When their descendants settled in Oregon's Willamette Valley in the 19th century.  The student body voted for "Webfoots" but over time the media began referring to them as "Ducks" and it stuck.

Banana Slugs was voted in as a joke by the UCSC students.

Look at others. A "Buckeye" is a kind of acorn.  A "Hoosier" is merely a resident of Indiana (and a derogatory term for certain people in Illinois and Missouri). An "Aggie" is merely a nickname for students at an agricultural school. Golden Gophers derives from Minnesota being nicknamed as "the Gopher State" by a political cartoonist. Cornhuskers? Boilermakers? Terrapins? Blue Jays? None of those names are particularly "terrifying" but they work.  In the end, it's the name of the university that matters.

The most "terrifying' name in the Big East may be the Blue Demons. How's that working out for DePaul in instilling fear and terror in opponents?

In all fairness Depaul was initially the D-Men because they didn't have a mascot and other schools referred to them as the D-Men because they had a big D on the front of their jerseys.
Maigh Eo for Sam

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #280 on: April 09, 2018, 12:03:24 PM »
In all fairness Depaul was initially the D-Men because they didn't have a mascot and other schools referred to them as the D-Men because they had a big D on the front of their jerseys.


Now that is actually an interesting story.  Never made that connection before.

naginiF

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1452
  • 'and the riot be the rhyme of the unheard'
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #281 on: April 09, 2018, 12:07:59 PM »
In all fairness Depaul was initially the D-Men because they didn't have a mascot and other schools referred to them as the D-Men because they had a big D on the front of their jerseys.
When you say "they had a big D on the front of their jersey" are you referring to the letter in the alphabet, or.....

Eldon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2945
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #282 on: April 09, 2018, 12:18:36 PM »
"Ducks" and "Beavers" have connections to the state of Oregon.  Beavers because Oregon is the Beaver State, Ducks actually evolved from "Webfoots" originally applied to a group of fishermen from the coast of Massachusetts who had been heroes during the American Revolutionary War. When their descendants settled in Oregon's Willamette Valley in the 19th century.  The student body voted for "Webfoots" but over time the media began referring to them as "Ducks" and it stuck.

Banana Slugs was voted in as a joke by the UCSC students.

Look at others. A "Buckeye" is a kind of acorn.  A "Hoosier" is merely a resident of Indiana (and a derogatory term for certain people in Illinois and Missouri). An "Aggie" is merely a nickname for students at an agricultural school. Golden Gophers derives from Minnesota being nicknamed as "the Gopher State" by a political cartoonist. Cornhuskers? Boilermakers? Terrapins? Blue Jays? None of those names are particularly "terrifying" but they work.  In the end, it's the name of the university that matters.

The most "terrifying' name in the Big East may be the Blue Demons. How's that working out for DePaul in instilling fear and terror in opponents?

Are you kidding me?  I fear our RPI every time we play DePaul.

StillAWarrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13061
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #284 on: April 09, 2018, 12:34:11 PM »
"Ducks" and "Beavers" have connections to the state of Oregon.  Beavers because Oregon is the Beaver State, Ducks actually evolved from "Webfoots" originally applied to a group of fishermen from the coast of Massachusetts who had been heroes during the American Revolutionary War. When their descendants settled in Oregon's Willamette Valley in the 19th century.  The student body voted for "Webfoots" but over time the media began referring to them as "Ducks" and it stuck.

Banana Slugs was voted in as a joke by the UCSC students.

Look at others. A "Buckeye" is a kind of acorn.  A "Hoosier" is merely a resident of Indiana (and a derogatory term for certain people in Illinois and Missouri). An "Aggie" is merely a nickname for students at an agricultural school. Golden Gophers derives from Minnesota being nicknamed as "the Gopher State" by a political cartoonist. Cornhuskers? Boilermakers? Terrapins? Blue Jays? None of those names are particularly "terrifying" but they work.  In the end, it's the name of the university that matters.

The most "terrifying' name in the Big East may be the Blue Demons. How's that working out for DePaul in instilling fear and terror in opponents?

Well, they have beat us three out of the last four years so perhaps we should tone down the chest thumping?

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #285 on: April 09, 2018, 12:37:14 PM »
Well, they have beat us three out of the last four years so perhaps we should tone down the chest thumping?

Marquette has won 4 of the last 5. So a two year blip when MU was rebuilding, then back to business as usual.

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3691
  • NA of course
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #286 on: April 09, 2018, 12:38:47 PM »
                might as well add these to the bonfire-

don't...don't don't don't don't

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22925
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #287 on: April 09, 2018, 12:39:35 PM »
Jumpin’ Jesuits would have been catchy.

I always pushed for Scalpin' Savages.

I mean, if you're gonna go with the negative Injun imagery, go all the way!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

TSmith34, Inc.

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5149
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #288 on: April 09, 2018, 12:41:06 PM »
                might as well add these to the bonfire-
Why?
If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.


Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13061
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #290 on: April 09, 2018, 12:49:45 PM »
Marquette has won 4 of the last 5. So a two year blip when MU was rebuilding, then back to business as usual.

And DePaul wasn't rebuilding?  The fact remains, MU has lost to DePaul in three out of the last four seasons.  Hardly worth getting a fan hard-on over a lame school mascot. 

Hopefully, we have turned the corner and the team plays like Warriors as you state.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #291 on: April 09, 2018, 12:58:01 PM »
When Wojo or anybody else talks about "playing like Warriors," the context isn't violence and destruction. To be a warrior is to be strong, to show courage, and to persevere no matter what. Granted, that may be too nuanced of an interpretation. Maybe the Marquette Pioneers would have been a more fitting nickname from the very beginning, acknowledging Father Marquette's dedication to exploration and the pursuit of knowledge.

Regardless, none of that matter now. I'm fine with Golden Eagles.


I agree.  Nonetheless, that is not what the name "Warriors" paired with Native American imagery has traditionally suggested due to the historical depiction of Native Americans as "savages".

I had hoped that we could have switched to a more positive warriors theme - someone on this board suggested Joan of Arc, which I thought was brilliant - but unfortunately, that's not going to happen.
Have some patience, FFS.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #292 on: April 09, 2018, 01:37:25 PM »
What's terrifying about ducks,  beavers,  or banana slugs?



Sum dudes are terrified of beavers. Can't understand der apprehension. Kinda enjoy seein' 'em in der natural habitat, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

TSmith34, Inc.

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5149
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #293 on: April 09, 2018, 01:52:16 PM »
You need to pay more attention to the whack-job media and their latest outrage.

http://www.maciverinstitute.com/2018/04/marquette-liberals-believe-university-seal-of-namesake-a-microaggression/

http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/marquette-forum-calls-university-seal-a-microaggression/

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10697
Ahhhhh, World Nut Daily.  How could I leave that off my reading list?  Without WND I never would have known that gays were behind the holocaust and Obama was a gay, secret Muslim, foreign born imposter.  The folks who think Breitbart is waayyyyyyy too liberal.
If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3691
  • NA of course
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #294 on: April 09, 2018, 02:20:25 PM »
What's terrifying about ducks,  beavers,  or banana slugs?

well not really terrifying but when the banana slugs meet the beavers, gotta keep those 2 separated-not a made for tv event, eyn'er?
don't...don't don't don't don't

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #295 on: April 09, 2018, 02:22:59 PM »


Sum dudes are terrified of beavers. Can't understand der apprehension. Kinda enjoy seein' 'em in der natural habitat, hey?

Ricky's on State is not their natural habitat, 4ever

Billy Hoyle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2674
  • Retire #34
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #296 on: April 09, 2018, 03:12:19 PM »
Well, they have beat us three out of the last four years so perhaps we should tone down the chest thumping?

I'm referring to overall - one winning record in 13 seasons, five seasons with single-digit wins, eight seasons finishing last in the Big East.  I don't think a couple of upset victories make up for overall horrendous results over a significant period of time. Every other team in the Big East has made the tourney at least twice, since DePaul rode our coattails to the Big East.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2018, 03:50:08 PM by Billy Hoyle »
“You either smoke or you get smoked. And you got smoked.”

buckchuckler

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 922
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #297 on: April 09, 2018, 04:45:40 PM »
Marquette has won 4 of the last 5. So a two year blip when MU was rebuilding, then back to business as usual.

Yeah well, that one out of 5 they got probably kept MU out of the tourney, so I take little solace in winning at an 80% clip.

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #298 on: April 09, 2018, 04:51:50 PM »
Yeah well, that one out of 5 they got probably kept MU out of the tourney, so I take little solace in winning at an 80% clip.

Whatever. Feel however you want to feel.

naginiF

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1452
  • 'and the riot be the rhyme of the unheard'
Re: Why Is It Ok For Golden State To Be Warriors But Not MU?
« Reply #299 on: April 09, 2018, 05:28:35 PM »
Whatever. Feel however you want to feel.
This should be the title of this thread