collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Pope Leo XIV by Uncle Rico
[Today at 09:13:00 AM]


Kam update by #UnleashSean
[May 09, 2025, 10:29:30 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by MU82
[May 09, 2025, 08:33:38 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by muwarrior69
[May 09, 2025, 05:02:23 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 09, 2025, 03:09:00 PM]


OT MU adds swimming program by The Sultan
[May 09, 2025, 12:10:04 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Galway Eagle
[May 08, 2025, 01:47:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Pakuni

Quote from: muwarrior69 on October 31, 2016, 04:12:56 PM
Catholicism is the only major religion that rejects birth control and as such was targeted to force it's religious groups to comply.

Hobby Lobby, which had a very similar fight with the Obama administration, is owned by an evangelical family.


brandx

Quote from: Benny B on October 31, 2016, 10:30:02 AM
I don't know where you've been, but anti-Catholic sentiment is alive and well.  I'm not going to compare it to the injustices against Native and African Americans, but there's been a renewal of anti-Catholic sentiment over the past decade ........

Some folks are offended when a religion hires pedophiles and then covers for them.

Benny B

Quote from: brandx on October 31, 2016, 06:33:25 PM
Some folks are offended when a religion hires pedophiles and then covers for them.

Just like Islam hired a bunch of terrorists and then covered for them, right?
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: Coleman on October 31, 2016, 12:43:23 PM
I guess I slightly misspoke. I'm sure there are people who privately harbor anti-Catholic prejudice. Although certainly far, far, fewer than five decades ago.

The difference is that the people who still feel that way about Catholics are such a fringe minority of American society that they have virtually zero impact on the actual lives of American Catholics.

An email from wikileaks showing that Clinton's campaign has a negative view of Catholics has zero real impact on my life.

So those at the top of the food chain of the Clinton campaign are a "fringe minority of American society"? Don't think so.

real chili 83


rocket surgeon

Quote from: real chili 83 on October 31, 2016, 10:10:15 PM
This thread is still open?

kinda like pickin at da scab, eyn'a?  oh, what the hell!  freedom from religion and separation of church and state aughtta fit in here somewhere, but depends on who's arguing what i guess
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

Coleman

Quote from: Lennys Tap on October 31, 2016, 10:08:05 PM
So those at the top of the food chain of the Clinton campaign are a "fringe minority of American society"? Don't think so.

You're reaching.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: Coleman on November 01, 2016, 09:18:11 AM
You're reaching.

No, merely turning your own assertions into a syllogism.

If (A) the only people who have a negative view of Catholics are on the fringe

And (B) emails show that the Clinton campaign has a negative view of Catholics

Then (C) the Clinton campaign is on the fringe.


Pakuni

Quote from: Lennys Tap on November 01, 2016, 09:53:14 AM
No, merely turning your own assertions into a syllogism.

If (A) the only people who have a negative view of Catholics are on the fringe

And (B) emails show that the Clinton campaign has a negative view of Catholics

Then (C) the Clinton campaign is on the fringe.

Good grief.
(A) One snarky remark made five years ago from a communications staffer (who wasn't a communications staffer at the time) does not "the Clinton campaign has a negative view of Catholics."
(B) The remark did not address all Catholics or Catholicism, but rather two specific Catholic converts (Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson) who the writer believed - correctly or not - were bastardizing Catholicism.
(C) That remark is not evidence of discrimination against Catholics.

Here's the remark, since you didn't include it, so everyone can judge whether it is what you claim it to be:
"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups," Halpin wrote in the 2011 email, according to WikiLeaks. "It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy."

By the way, I also believe the Catholic Church has a backwards view of gender relations. Does this mean I'm prejudiced against Catholics?

Lennys Tap

Quote from: Pakuni on November 01, 2016, 10:09:59 AM
Good grief.
(A) One snarky remark made five years ago from a communications staffer (who wasn't a communications staffer at the time) does not "the Clinton campaign has a negative view of Catholics."
(B) The remark did not address all Catholics or Catholicism, but rather two specific Catholic converts (Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson) who the writer believed - correctly or not - were bastardizing Catholicism.
(C) That remark is not evidence of discrimination against Catholics.

Here's the remark, since you didn't include it, so everyone can judge whether it is what you claim it to be:
"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups," Halpin wrote in the 2011 email, according to WikiLeaks. "It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy."

By the way, I also believe the Catholic Church has a backwards view of gender relations. Does this mean I'm prejudiced against Catholics?

Good grief, indeed. They're not my words. They're Coleman's.

Coleman

Quote from: Pakuni on November 01, 2016, 10:09:59 AM
Good grief.
(A) One snarky remark made five years ago from a communications staffer (who wasn't a communications staffer at the time) does not "the Clinton campaign has a negative view of Catholics."
(B) The remark did not address all Catholics or Catholicism, but rather two specific Catholic converts (Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson) who the writer believed - correctly or not - were bastardizing Catholicism.
(C) That remark is not evidence of discrimination against Catholics.

Here's the remark, since you didn't include it, so everyone can judge whether it is what you claim it to be:
"Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups," Halpin wrote in the 2011 email, according to WikiLeaks. "It's an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy."

By the way, I also believe the Catholic Church has a backwards view of gender relations. Does this mean I'm prejudiced against Catholics?

Yup

real chili 83


Benny B

Can someone explain what "gender relations" are, i.e. is that a) similar to "public relations" insomuch as how the church speaks to the genders separately, b) how the genders relate to each other, or c) something else?

Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Pakuni

Quote from: Benny B on November 01, 2016, 11:34:36 AM
Can someone explain what "gender relations" are, i.e. is that a) similar to "public relations" insomuch as how the church speaks to the genders separately, b) how the genders relate to each other, or c) something else?

All of the above.

Juan Anderson's Mixtape

Quote from: Benny B on November 01, 2016, 11:34:36 AM
Can someone explain what "gender relations" are, i.e. is that a) similar to "public relations" insomuch as how the church speaks to the genders separately, b) how the genders relate to each other, or c) something else?

I believe Catholic teaching is to abstain from gender relations until marriage.

Benny B

Quote from: Pakuni on November 01, 2016, 11:42:04 AM
All of the above.

So in other words, nobody has a clue as to what that meant.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Pakuni

Quote from: Benny B on November 01, 2016, 04:17:46 PM
So in other words, nobody has a clue as to what that meant.

I gave an answer as sincere as your question.

Benny B

Quote from: Pakuni on November 01, 2016, 05:33:02 PM
I gave an answer as sincere as your question.

And I can appreciate your confidence, but I'm still wondering to what the hell Halpin was referring.  Context is significant.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Previous topic - Next topic