collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Congrats to Royce by Shaka Shart
[Today at 11:59:34 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 10:55:21 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]


2026 Bracketology by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 07:56:46 AM]


NM by rocky_warrior
[May 23, 2025, 01:50:02 AM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[May 22, 2025, 11:29:22 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


NavinRJohnson

I do think the NHL needs to change the playoff seeding to more of a straight 1-8. Obviously you eventually have to beat the good teams to advance, but Blackhawks v. Blues should not have been a first round series. Those were two of the best teams in the league (I do think the Blues are/were the better team), and now one is out. Same could be said of the Kings, Panthers, Rangers (respectively anyway)...Obviously seeds don't always hold, but current system just seems to water down the later rounds.

jsglow

Got outplayed last night.  Congratulations to the Blues.  They earned it.  Had Crow not been unbelievable it wouldn't have been a one goal margin.

NavinRJohnson

Quote from: jsglow on April 26, 2016, 08:23:43 AM
Got outplayed last night.  Congratulations to the Blues.  They earned it.  Had Crow not been unbelievable it wouldn't have been a one goal margin.

Agreed. Just beat by a better team. That second period was coconuts.

I think they will be ok next year relative to their trouble scoring outside the top line. Panrin, Teravainen, etc. are still quite young, so I suspect they will be able to offer more through the entire season next year.  They have GOT TO find  way to add some depth at defenseman though. It almost cost them last year, and it did cost them this year.


jsglow

Quote from: NavinRJohnson on April 26, 2016, 08:32:48 AM
Agreed. Just beat by a better team. That second period was coconuts.

I think they will be ok next year relative to their trouble scoring outside the top line. Panrin, Teravainen, etc. are still quite young, so I suspect they will be able to offer more through the entire season next year.  They have GOT TO find  way to add some depth at defenseman though. It almost cost them last year, and it did cost them this year.

Agree with all your points.  Will add one.  Playing until the 4th of July has a way of taking a little from your legs the next year.  A little tweak and they're still a championship team.


rocket surgeon

ok, not about playoffs, but re: NHL-their 31st team-las vegas

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/16429478/nhl-officially-approves-las-vegas-31st-franchise


question?  why 31 teams?  i know they may be considering putting a team back in quebec, but otherwise, you mean toi tell me that all the other 30 teams are doing really well?  why not just muscle one the teams from a poorly performing market and relocate them to vegas?  right off hand, i'm not familiar enough with the league as a whole and which team that might be-just wondering
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

Coleman

Quote from: rocket surgeon on June 22, 2016, 10:30:00 PM
ok, not about playoffs, but re: NHL-their 31st team-las vegas

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/16429478/nhl-officially-approves-las-vegas-31st-franchise


question?  why 31 teams?  i know they may be considering putting a team back in quebec, but otherwise, you mean toi tell me that all the other 30 teams are doing really well?  why not just muscle one the teams from a poorly performing market and relocate them to vegas?  right off hand, i'm not familiar enough with the league as a whole and which team that might be-just wondering

Florida Panthers come to mind as a relocation candidate. But I think they will move to 32 teams soon. And probably Quebec.

Brewtown Andy

Quote from: Coleman on June 22, 2016, 10:31:32 PM
Florida Panthers come to mind as a relocation candidate. But I think they will move to 32 teams soon. And probably Quebec.

Quebec City is the ideal landing spot for a relocation.

Putting a team in Vegas makes new fans of hockey, even more so when you give them a brand new team that's just for them.  Putting a team in Quebec City, new team or relocated team, makes absolutely zero new fans of hockey.
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

MU Fan in Connecticut

Quote from: Coleman on June 22, 2016, 10:31:32 PM
Florida Panthers come to mind as a relocation candidate. But I think they will move to 32 teams soon. And probably Quebec.

And Arizona & Carolina

GGGG

Quote from: Brewtown Andy on June 22, 2016, 10:43:41 PM
Quebec City is the ideal landing spot for a relocation.

Putting a team in Vegas makes new fans of hockey, even more so when you give them a brand new team that's just for them.  Putting a team in Quebec City, new team or relocated team, makes absolutely zero new fans of hockey.


The biggest relocation candidates happen to be in the places where they have tried "making new fans of hockey."  That pretty much signifies that the effort has been mixed at best.

The biggest problem with Quebec is the weak Canadian dollar and that its a meager television market.

JWags85

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on June 23, 2016, 09:49:11 AM

The biggest relocation candidates happen to be in the places where they have tried "making new fans of hockey."  That pretty much signifies that the effort has been mixed at best.

The biggest problem with Quebec is the weak Canadian dollar and that its a meager television market.

Thats gonna be the trouble with QC.  Rabid fanbase to be sure, and a beautiful new arena, but a market that is very small.  I forgot the comparable US market, but its one that wouldn't appeal if that was what was being proposed. 

GGGG

Quote from: JWags85 on June 23, 2016, 09:54:36 AM
Thats gonna be the trouble with QC.  Rabid fanbase to be sure, and a beautiful new arena, but a market that is very small.  I forgot the comparable US market, but its one that wouldn't appeal if that was what was being proposed. 


Quebec City is about 55% the size of the Milwaukee market.  (Las Vegas is smaller than Milwaukee too.  But they won't have competition from the NBA.)


Coleman

#62
Quote from: JWags85 on June 23, 2016, 09:54:36 AM
Thats gonna be the trouble with QC.  Rabid fanbase to be sure, and a beautiful new arena, but a market that is very small.  I forgot the comparable US market, but its one that wouldn't appeal if that was what was being proposed.

Quebec City itself is about the size of Milwaukee. However, the metro is pretty small. the city is 80% of the metro population...its about the size of the Omaha metro.

But comparing to US metros is apples to oranges. Canada is hockey crazy. It doesn't compete with other sports the way that US markets do.

JWags85

Quote from: Coleman on June 23, 2016, 10:00:14 AM
Quebec City itself is a decent size city, about the size of Seattle or Denver. However, the metro is pretty small. the city is 80% of the metro population...its about the size of the Omaha metro.

But comparing to US metros is apples to oranges. Canada is hockey crazy. It doesn't compete with other sports the way that US markets do.

I was seeing a metro of 800K which is more like the size of the Madison or Des Moines metro.

Previous topic - Next topic