collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by cheebs09
[Today at 10:07:58 AM]


NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 05:18:20 AM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]


ESPN's Way Too Early Poll by BM1090
[May 04, 2025, 11:52:59 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by MuMark
[May 04, 2025, 04:23:25 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


GGGG

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 07:49:24 PM
But if Bradford plays like he did last year(even without considering better talent around him) this team will compete. It's all this offense requires.


So if he finishes 31 out of 33 in QBR, and 25 out of 35 in passer rating, that's all this offense requires?

Then how come they didn't do better last year with a CLEARLY better quarterback?

Dish

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 07:58:44 PM
No it's not.

If the pick means that much to them(it doesn't)

They have so many picks stockpiled they could easy trade both 3rd next year for a early second round pick.

Now you got a early 2nd rounder and a late second rounder instead of a mid first and late second.

The vikes always make moves with picks, if they want to get somewhere they will make it happen.

Again, unless you can gurantee me that by tanking this year they can get Andrew Lucks doppleganger, it's a well thought risk.

Thank you for helping to validate my point.

If it was a well thought risk, and the Vikes apparently don't care about their first round picks, why didn't they trade for Bradford in March or April when he could have been had for a 4th or 5th round pick? By your logic, with all the extra picks Spielman stockpiles, why not use that extra mid round capital then to address the backup QB?

brandx

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 07:58:44 PM
No it's not.

If the pick means that much to them(it doesn't)

They have so many picks stockpiled they could easy trade both 3rd next year for a early second round pick.

Now you got a early 2nd rounder and a late second rounder instead of a mid first and late second.

The vikes always make moves with picks, if they want to get somewhere they will make it happen.

Again, unless you can gurantee me that by tanking this year they can get Andrew Lucks doppleganger, it's a well thought risk.

Two 3rds will not get an early 2nd rounder - maybe a mid 2nd if both 3rds are in the 1st half of the round.

And where is the late 2nd rounder coming from?

Jay Bee

Quote from: brandx on September 05, 2016, 07:14:13 PM
I'm wondering why you think Bradford is an improvement over Hill.

Bradford has proven to be an awful QB every single year in the NFL. There is not one shred of evidence that he is worthy of being a starter. I guess I would need to be shown how he is better than Hill.

Hill is an elderly man who has started in the NFL one season (8 games) in the past five seasons. Bradford is 28 and has started more than 60 games over that same time period.

There is a reason why.
The portal is NOT closed.

MU82

Quote from: MUDish on September 05, 2016, 07:24:57 PM
I'm not going to argue most of this, but on the sidelines, Cutler hasn't been like Rodgers or Brady yelling openly at teammates. Yes, he has indifferent body language, but he actually has gone out of his way in the media to always support his teammates (see last week with Kevin White).

Well, he didn't "always support" this guy, and this was the blowup I remember ...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000063455/article/jay-cutler-criticized-by-bears-teammate-for-yelling
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

brandx

Quote from: Jay Bee on September 05, 2016, 08:55:26 PM
Hill is an elderly man who has started in the NFL one season (8 games) in the past five seasons. Bradford is 28 and has started more than 60 games over that same time period.

There is a reason why.

Desperation?

Mark Sanchez had a higher QB rating as Philly's starting QB in 2014 than Bradford did in 2015.

And as for those 60+ games that Sam started - all they did was convince both teams to dump him as soon as they had a chance.

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: brandx on September 05, 2016, 08:10:36 PM
Two 3rds will not get an early 2nd rounder - maybe a mid 2nd if both 3rds are in the 1st half of the round.

And where is the late 2nd rounder coming from?

When the Vikings finish around 10th in the NFL this year.

This will have the 20th pick in the second round, possibly better their schedule.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 05, 2016, 08:06:12 PM

So if he finishes 31 out of 33 in QBR, and 25 out of 35 in passer rating, that's all this offense requires?

Then how come they didn't do better last year with a CLEARLY better quarterback?

Uhhhhh I said the team will compete. I mean last year they went 11-5 and won the division so that's certainly even more than competing.

Clearly better?

Teddy passer rating was better by about 2. Yards per attempt and completion were basically identical. Both had very low int rates.

And yeah, Bradford played with a god awful supporting cast and no running game.

Again, Teddy is better. But if he can go 11-5 playing the NFC and AFC West I think Bradford can compete against his schedule.

Again, it's why no one around the league is bashing the move. He's all the offense needs.

Could just wait 8 weeks and get back to me?
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Pakuni

Quote from: MUDish on September 05, 2016, 07:24:57 PM
I'm not going to argue most of this, but on the sidelines, Cutler hasn't been like Rodgers or Brady yelling openly at teammates. Yes, he has indifferent body language, but he actually has gone out of his way in the media to always support his teammates (see last week with Kevin White).

True.
Jay usually reserves his open disdain and yelling for the coaching staff.
Oh, and the ball boys.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: MU82 on September 05, 2016, 06:50:15 PM
Plus, he rips his own teammates, has terrible body language when facing adversity and makes facial expressions that convey, "It's not my fault. Blame them."

He is, in a word, a loser.

This is just lazy and shows how perceptions do not change even if the player and the behavior do change.

Cutler certainly earned that reputation. However, there has been a pretty significant change in his leadership, interactions with teammates, and dealing with the media over the past couple of years.

Fox and Pace would have jettisoned him already if that were still an issue.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 09:52:58 PM
Uhhhhh I said the team will compete. I mean last year they went 11-5 and won the division so that's certainly even more than competing.

Clearly better?

Teddy passer rating was better by about 2. Yards per attempt and completion were basically identical. Both had very low int rates.

And yeah, Bradford played with a god awful supporting cast and no running game.

Again, Teddy is better. But if he can go 11-5 playing the NFC and AFC West I think Bradford can compete against his schedule.

Again, it's why no one around the league is bashing the move. He's all the offense needs.

Could just wait 8 weeks and get back to me?

I've seen plenty of bashing of the move, and rightfully so. Bradford making the Vikes a better team after the injury and it being an awful trade are not mutually exclusive.

Dish

Quote from: Pakuni on September 05, 2016, 10:04:31 PM
True.
Jay usually reserves his open disdain and yelling for the coaching staff.
Oh, and the ball boys.

I always loved the hot mic that picked up Cutler instructing the sideline to tell Martz "eff you".

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on September 05, 2016, 10:13:48 PM
I've seen plenty of bashing of the move, and rightfully so. Bradford making the Vikes a better team after the injury and it being an awful trade are not mutually exclusive.

Well yeah, there have been loads of casual people like you and I bashing it.

But the "talking heads" so to speak, around the league have almost unanimously liked the move. Called it risky, but liked it.

Even that bumbling buffoon Herman Edwards liked it for both sides.

Also, if Zimmer is on board smart money is side with him. He's smarter than us all.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

wadesworld

As a Packers fan, I love this move.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 10:31:56 PM
Well yeah, there have been loads of casual people like you and I bashing it.

But the "talking heads" so to speak, around the league have almost unanimously liked the move. Called it risky, but liked it.

Even that bumbling buffoon Herman Edwards liked it for both sides.

Also, if Zimmer is on board smart money is side with him. He's smarter than us all.

I guess I'm not sure which talking heads you're referring to. I understand going out and making a move. I'm just very surprised at the cost and that MN agreed to it. We'll see how it plays out.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on September 05, 2016, 05:41:23 PM
You realize that 1st round picks are pro bowlers 30% of time right?

Well Bradford has a 1% chance of being a pro bowler this season so I guess the 30% is better, a ina?

I get that the Vikings are in win now mode but I don't see Bradford leading the Vikes to the playoffs. I think they fall just short with a mid level draft position without their first and fourth round picks.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MU82

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on September 05, 2016, 10:11:11 PM
This is just lazy and shows how perceptions do not change even if the player and the behavior do change.

Cutler certainly earned that reputation. However, there has been a pretty significant change in his leadership, interactions with teammates, and dealing with the media over the past couple of years.

Fox and Pace would have jettisoned him already if that were still an issue.

Oh, you've really wounded me with the lazy charge.

I gotta go take a nap now.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell


brandx

The Rams traded Bradford to Philly last year in exchange for Nick effin Foles!

A year later, the Eagles were so disenchanted with Sam that they traded FIVE drft picks (including two first-rounders) to draft Carson Wentz. This was after the best 10 game stretch of his career and they still could see he was no good.

Shaun Hill has a better record as a starter, higher completion% as a starter, higher TD % as a starter and more yards per attempt as a starter.

After the Rams made Bradford the first pick in 2010, he never averaged more than 6.7 yards per pass. When Bradford missed the 2014 season with a torn ACL, with many of the same teammates in St. Louis, Hill started eight games for the Rams and averaged 7.2 yards per pass.

Bradford is where he is because he was a #1 overall pick. If he was drafted a dozen picks later, he is Mark Sanchez.


And let's not forget the Minny defense is good - not great. Their defense was only 12th in the league in points allowed per drive. If they rank 12th again, they might win 6 or 7 games.

Jay Bee

Quote from: brandx on September 05, 2016, 09:24:33 PM
Desperation?

Mark Sanchez had a higher QB rating as Philly's starting QB in 2014 than Bradford did in 2015.

...this is about Bradford vs Hill, but... in 2015, Bradford 14 GS; Sanchez 2
The portal is NOT closed.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: MU82 on September 05, 2016, 11:23:13 PM
Oh, you've really wounded me with the lazy charge.

I gotta go take a nap now.

Sorry.  Maybe uninformed would have been more accurate. 

MU82

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on September 06, 2016, 09:10:12 AM
Sorry.  Maybe uninformed would have been more accurate.

Oh, please stop. This really hurts.

But do please continue educating the rest of us lazy dopes about the wonders of Jay Cutler, Winner Extraordinaire!
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: MU82 on September 06, 2016, 09:13:19 AM
Oh, please stop. This really hurts.

But do please continue educating the rest of us lazy dopes about the wonders of Jay Cutler, Winner Extraordinaire!

Yes, my intentions are to really hurt you with my scathing comments.

I'm not Cutler apologist.  I never said he he was a great QB or that he didn't earn his sh*tty reputation.  It was well-deserved.  But it's simply not the case anymore so what's the issue with calling someone out on that?  Your comments were lazy. 

He also has a foundation for kids with diabetes and does a lot of under the radar charity work from what I understand.  What a loser. 

GGGG

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on September 06, 2016, 09:44:55 AM
Yes, my intentions are to really hurt you with my scathing comments.

I'm not Cutler apologist.  I never said he he was a great QB or that he didn't earn his sh*tty reputation.  It was well-deserved.  But it's simply not the case anymore so what's the issue with calling someone out on that?  Your comments were lazy. 

He also has a foundation for kids with diabetes and does a lot of under the radar charity work from what I understand.  What a loser. 


He really should vaccinate his kids though.

Pakuni

#349
Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on September 05, 2016, 10:11:11 PM
Fox and Pace would have jettisoned him already if that were still an issue.

Would that be the same Ryan Pace and John Fox that brought on Ray McDonald last year?
Yep, they're all about character players.

Realistically, there's no way they could have jettisoned Cutler if they wanted to. There's zero trade market for a mediocre QB with a $17 million cap hit, and his contract was structured so that while cutting him after this season is easy, cutting him any earlier would be terrible for the Bears cap situation. They're not keeping Cutler because he's a changed man. They're keeping him because they have no choice.

Previous topic - Next topic