collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

More conference realignment talk by MU Fan in Connecticut
[Today at 10:29:06 AM]


2025-26 Schedule by cheebs09
[Today at 10:07:58 AM]


NIL Money by tower912
[Today at 05:18:20 AM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]


ESPN's Way Too Early Poll by BM1090
[May 04, 2025, 11:52:59 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


BM1090

Quote from: wadesworld on September 03, 2016, 09:43:17 PM
And you're a 40 something year old online douche.

In fairness, we're all kind of online douches.

wadesworld

Quote from: MuEagle1090 on September 04, 2016, 04:18:57 PM
In fairness, we're all kind of online douches.

I am. But I don't know that I agree that everyone on here is.

brandx

Quote from: MUDish on September 03, 2016, 10:32:52 AM
I don't understand who the Vikes were competing with in the marketplace for Bradford's services. He could have been had this offseason for a mid/late round pick.

The Vikes must know Bridgewater isn't coming back for 2017 to have made this deal.

Exactly. I would have considered just the 4th rounder as a real win for the Eagles. Now there is a very good possibility they get a top 10 overall pick as well.

brandx

Quote from: wadesworld on September 04, 2016, 06:01:14 PM
I am. But I don't know that I agree that everyone on here is.

Thank you, Wades 8-)

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: brandx on September 04, 2016, 06:07:50 PM
Exactly. I would have considered just the 4th rounder as a real win for the Eagles. Now there is a very good possibility they get a top 10 overall pick as well.

No way they're that bad. They still play the Bears and Lions 4 times.

rocket surgeon

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 04, 2016, 06:42:42 PM
No way they're that bad. They still play the Bears and Lions 4 times.

NICE !!!!  Da bears missed a great opportunity to unload cutler.  At least it would have kept him in the division for us to beat up on, AND the Bears would be guaranteed at least 2 wins, Eyn'a?
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

RJax55

Bears release Robbie Gould. Cutler now the most tenured Bear.

mu03eng

Quote from: MuEagle1090 on September 04, 2016, 04:18:57 PM
In fairness, we're all kind of online douches.

HEY! I resemble that remark
"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

Dr. Blackheart

Sitton to the Bears in a three year deal, reportedly.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on September 04, 2016, 09:53:30 PM
Sitton to the Bears in a three year deal, reportedly.

Well, if you wanna give a big FU to the Packers, that's the way to do it.

wadesworld

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 04, 2016, 10:20:00 PM
Well, if you wanna give a big FU to the Packers, that's the way to do it.

...until the season starts and you miss the Playoffs and the Packers win the Division by 4 games.

GGGG

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 04, 2016, 10:20:00 PM
Well, if you wanna give a big FU to the Packers, that's the way to do it.


By signing a guy they didn't want???

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 04, 2016, 10:24:15 PM

By signing a guy they didn't want???

Was talking about Sittons side of it. Bears had a dire need on the OL. Not like they're gonna be in the playoff picture but at least it will make games more watchable.

Dish

Be interesting to see the final numbers on Sitton, Bears have ton of cap space, my guess is it's front loaded, but have to like the signing. Healthy, 30 year old, second team all pro's rarely hit the street, especially at a position of need. If Whitehair can develop at center between Long and Sitton, that's what I'd like to see come out of this season.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 04, 2016, 10:30:09 PM
Was talking about Sittons side of it. Bears had a dire need on the OL. Not like they're gonna be in the playoff picture but at least it will make games more watchable.

It's a good signing. I like what Pace is doing.

It's a long shot but I won't rule them out of the WC race.

Carolina, Arizona, Seattle, Green Bay, NFC East champ. To me that 6th spot is wide open right now.

forgetful

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 04, 2016, 10:30:09 PM
Was talking about Sittons side of it. Bears had a dire need on the OL. Not like they're gonna be in the playoff picture but at least it will make games more watchable.

I thought you were thinking that Sitton was going to sign as their new QB.  Would be an upgrade.

rocket surgeon

Quote from: MUDish on September 04, 2016, 10:50:25 PM
Be interesting to see the final numbers on Sitton, Bears have ton of cap space, my guess is it's front loaded, but have to like the signing. Healthy, 30 year old, second team all pro's rarely hit the street, especially at a position of need. If Whitehair can develop at center between Long and Sitton, that's what I'd like to see come out of this season.

3 year deal worth $21.5 mil, $10 guaranteed...that pretty good for a cast away. So who do the packers have that matches or beats sitton's pro bowl talent at what I'm assuming to be bargain $. Did they need the money/cap space?  Hey,mother dude at least STOOD for the national anthem for chriminey sakes.  I haven't read any comments from Rodgers et al
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

GGGG

Quote from: MUDish on September 04, 2016, 10:50:25 PM
Be interesting to see the final numbers on Sitton, Bears have ton of cap space, my guess is it's front loaded, but have to like the signing. Healthy, 30 year old, second team all pro's rarely hit the street, especially at a position of need. If Whitehair can develop at center between Long and Sitton, that's what I'd like to see come out of this season.

Not sure how healthy he is. That is part of the reason why they didn't want to extend.

cheebs09

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 05, 2016, 06:56:12 AM
Not sure how healthy he is. That is part of the reason why they didn't want to extend.

I saw some mentions of him not being able to run block due to his back. Packers may just think this is the year he has a big drop. Although, I'm a little nervous about the backup options.

ChitownSpaceForRent

Quote from: forgetful on September 05, 2016, 02:50:44 AM
I thought you were thinking that Sitton was going to sign as their new QB.  Would be an upgrade.

Cutler isn't the problem. He's not a superstar but he's more than serviceable. We can all stop with this false sentiment now.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: Chitown4for4 on September 05, 2016, 09:22:44 AM
Cutler isn't the problem. He's not a superstar but he's more than serviceable. We can all stop with this false sentiment now.

Yep.

Dish

Still doesn't make sense to me on Sitton and the Pack. Even if they thought he would regress this year, he's not killing their cap. He at least passed a physical. Odds are very high they'd have gotten a compensatory pick once he left, probably at a decent number. They had nothing to lose by keeping him, and much to gain.

jsglow

There was a good article in the paper suggesting that this move was Lombardi-like comparing it to shipping off Ringo.  I think it does 2 things. One, it reminds every player that they can be replaced.  It had been probably since Greg Jennings or Sir Charles since Ted dumped a high profile vet. Two, it frees up cap money this year to do priority extensions including possibly Rodgers. I sense Ted felt a need to set a tone and felt a declining Sitton was the spot to do it in. Here's what I am 100% sure of. McCarthy was fully consulted and was 100% on board.

🏀

Quote from: jsglow on September 05, 2016, 10:16:14 AM
There was a good article in the paper suggesting that this move was Lombardi-like comparing it to shipping off Ringo.  I think it does 2 things. One, it reminds every player that they can be replaced.  It had been probably since Greg Jennings or Sir Charles since Ted dumped a high profile vet. Two, it frees up cap money this year to do priority extensions including possibly Rodgers. I sense Ted felt a need to set a tone and felt a declining Sitton was the spot to do it in. Here's what I am 100% sure of. McCarthy was fully consulted and was 100% on board.

McCarthy not being on board wold make me feel better about it.

GGGG

Quote from: MUDish on September 05, 2016, 09:44:06 AM
Still doesn't make sense to me on Sitton and the Pack. Even if they thought he would regress this year, he's not killing their cap. He at least passed a physical. Odds are very high they'd have gotten a compensatory pick once he left, probably at a decent number. They had nothing to lose by keeping him, and much to gain.


Rumors are he was getting sour in the locker room because of his contract situation.  Only way Ted knows about this is via McCarthy.

Previous topic - Next topic