collapse

'23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Server Upgrade - This is the new server by rocky_warrior
[Today at 06:04:17 PM]


Big East 2024 -25 Results by Herman Cain
[Today at 05:57:33 PM]


Owens out Monday by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[Today at 03:23:08 PM]


Shaka Preseason Availability by Tyler COLEk
[Today at 03:14:12 PM]


Marquette Picked #3 in Big East Conference Preview by Jay Bee
[Today at 02:04:27 PM]


Get to know Ben Steele by Hidden User
[Today at 12:14:10 PM]


Deleted by TallTitan34
[Today at 09:31:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

Next up: B&G Tip-Off Luncheon

Marquette
Marquette

B&G Luncheon

Date/Time: Oct 31, 2024 11:30am
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

If Martin is the Next Coach: What are Expectations

Started by MikeDeanesDarkGlasses, March 31, 2014, 04:34:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

Cuonzo Martin Expectations:
Let's say he keeps most of the recruits on board for next year, but minus Ahmed Hill.  In his place, we will say that a juco player is brought on board or some Tenn transfer. 

What are the expectations from MU fans?

Year 1
Year 2
Year 3

keefe

That his contract buyout is low to begin with and zeroes out by Year 3


Death on call

humanlung

That you could roll bowling balls around the upper section of the BC without risk of hitting anyone.

frozena pizza

For me the expectation will be the same regardless of who we hire, which is to continue our current trajectory.  In most cases, a coaching change doesn't have a major impact on an established program.  I expect us to be in the hunt for a Big East title most years and make the tournament more often than not, with an occasional run past the first weekend.

Groin_pull

I'll take a stab at Year 1: 15-17 overall. 7-11 in conference. No NCAA. No NIT.

mechaghidorah


MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

Quote from: humanlung on March 31, 2014, 04:37:22 PM
That you could roll bowling balls around the upper section of the BC without risk of hitting anyone.

Is that why you're salty that the Milwaukee Wave might be leaving?

3Mer

Quote from: humanlung on March 31, 2014, 04:37:22 PM
That you could roll bowling balls around the upper section of the BC without risk of hitting anyone.

This could be said of all the candidates save maybe Howland and perhaps Miller.

humanlung

Quote from: 3Mer on March 31, 2014, 04:42:27 PM
This could be said of all the candidates save maybe Howland and perhaps Miller.

Exactly...the guy who WANTS to be here.

Hards Alumni

This thread tho.

you guys are a bunch of dick bags.

Nukem2

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on March 31, 2014, 04:46:04 PM
This thread tho.

you guys are a bunch of dick bags.
they wonder why the board has a bad rep.

humanlung

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on March 31, 2014, 04:46:04 PM
This thread tho.

you guys are a bunch of dick bags.

I am insulted.  I will have you know I am my own dick bag.  I resent being lumped in with others.

Windyplayer

Quote from: Groin_pull on March 31, 2014, 04:39:24 PM
I'll take a stab at Year 1: 15-17 overall. 7-11 in conference. No NCAA. No NIT.
I'm shocked by this prediction. I mean, truly shocked. I don't think I'm conveying how shocked I am--just truly blown away.

LAZER

Year 1 - Bad
Year 2 - Better
Year 3 - NCAA Bid
Year 4 - NCAA Win

humanlung

Quote from: Nukem2 on March 31, 2014, 04:47:35 PM
  they wonder why the board has a bad rep.

Someone asked.  I answered.  And I fully admit that I am incredibly frustrated by the process on this one.  

Sometimes, in my opinion, like right now, "analysis paralysis" happens, where the obvious isn't done in the name of following the "process" and looking at every possible "viable" (not necessarily "best") alternative.    

Again, just my opinion.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: humanlung on March 31, 2014, 04:52:04 PM
Someone asked.  I answered.  And I fully admit that I am incredibly frustrated by the process on this one.  

Sometimes, in my opinion, like right now, "analysis paralysis" happens, where the obvious isn't done in the name of following the "process" and looking at every possible "viable" (not necessarily "best") alternative.    

Again, just my opinion.

Realistic expectations.


Fullodds

Cords said 'impact hire' -- this is not an impact hire.  


MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

Quote from: LAZER on March 31, 2014, 04:49:38 PM
Year 1 - Bad
Year 2 - Better
Year 3 - NCAA Bid
Year 4 - NCAA Win

Let me guess, though, each year we're in the top 20 on Ken Pom for defensive and offensive efficiency?!!

Memes.com</a>

Silkk the Shaka

1.) Keep the core players currently on the roster that have stated they want to stay: Duane Wilson, Deonte Burton, Luke Fischer, John Dawson.

2.) Keep at least 2, hopefully 3 or all out of the following the fold: Jajuan Johnson, Steve Taylor, Sandy Cohen, Ahmed Hill

3.) Make a hard run at Stone, sign a great first class in 2015

4.) Barring injury, finish .500 or better in conference year 1, make the tournament year 2, make a S16 or better tournament run year three

5.) Continue to stock the roster with talent 2016 and beyond


That's what I would hope for with any hire, by the way

LAZER

Quote from: MikeDeanesDarkGlasses on March 31, 2014, 04:57:16 PM
Let me guess, though, each year we're in the top 20 on Ken Pom for defensive and offensive efficiency?!!



I don't give a fck what the numbers are, what the stars are next to the recruits, or the style of play as long as MU is winning.

Windyplayer

Quote from: MikeDeanesDarkGlasses on March 31, 2014, 04:57:16 PM
Let me guess, though, each year we're in the top 20 on Ken Pom for defensive and offensive efficiency?!!

Memes.com</a>
Doesn't the fact that every other team with a top 25 offense and defense this year had really good years lead you to believe that what happened in Tennessee was a fluke?

melissasmooth

MU15

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: MikeDeanesDarkGlasses on March 31, 2014, 04:57:16 PM
Let me guess, though, each year we're in the top 20 on Ken Pom for defensive and offensive efficiency?!!

I get that you're being a dick, and I sense we will get this from you ad infinitum for the foreseeable future, but if we had a top 20 KenPom offense & defense for the first four consecutive years, we would have several deep tournament runs to correspond. So I don't exactly know why you would sarcastically dismiss it or act like that wouldn't be a good thing... unless you don't really know what you're saying, which I'm not ruling out...

MikeDeanesDarkGlasses

Quote from: melissasmooth on March 31, 2014, 05:01:58 PM
That I complete my senior year

Uh oh..... are you going to pull a Buzz and transfer?