Scholarship table
Even with that ugly start against the Brewers, Montgomery went 5-5 with a 4.15 ERA and a 1.14 WHIP in 14 starts and that was typically with a pitch count of around 80-90. I'd take those numbers from a back-of-the-rotation guy.
Here you go.
I'll probably regretting asking/engaging but I'm genuinely curious about something. I just need a Yes/No answer to this. Nothing more.Is your contention that all 5 Cubs starting pitchers were taking PEDs during the 2016 season and then, either collectively or individually, decided to stop using them for the 2017 season?
No.
Home team undefeated in the ALCS.
Jacob Turner looks like a refugee from Thorin Oakenshield's merry band of dwarves.
Justin not to be confused with former terrible white sox, marlins etc pitcher, Jacob Turner.
Right call to keep Davis in. No other choice, you worry about tomorrow when it gets there. Got to win one, to win four.
I'm not sure I've ever seen a more egregious umpiring decision than that "foul tip" call in the top of the 8th.
So asking if over 0.5 Cubs players had taken PEDs and reciting an odd statistic that ESPN had out there is saying the entire Cubs rotation was on PEDS? Odd conclusion there but okay I guess.I guess you also failed to read slightly further when I was directly asked that exact question:My response was:So if by, “No,” you took my answer to mean, “Yes,” then yeah, I said all 5 starters for the Cubs were on PEDs.Glad you finally got back to me on that. The Cubs losing must’ve opened up some extra time for you to research and come up with answers that prove I never said that.Now if unleashrowsey will find where I said I don’t care about sports we can bury that one too.
Justin not to be confused with former terrible white sox, marlins etc pitcher, Jacob Turner.By the way, I think Alex Wood knew Contreras hit a HR before he swung.
If you aren’t implying that they took steroids then what are you hinting at? Keep in mind you included this with all of your Arrieta PED theories.
I did include this with all my Arietta PED stuff? Which part? The first post you quoted, which had nothing to do with all 5 starters on the Cubs, or any starter really, was posted on September 22. The next 2 are from September 28 and was reciting a statistic that ESPN had out in their article that day. Which is what I said then and said yesterday. That’s what I was hinting at. That ESPN pointed out a pretty odd stat about the Cubs starters.Again, if you took my answer of “No” to the exact, direct question you are saying I said happened as meaning “Yes” then I can see where you read me saying all 5 Cubs starters had taken PEDs. How you get to that reading of it is beyond me but that’s on you. It’s not difficult. It’s laid out word for word in MM’s question asking for a simple yes/no, and my giving him a simple yes/no.
I usually defend umps, but this was truly awful, both in the way it was dealt with and in the final result. I'm glad Davis struck out Granderson on the very next pitch. So, in the end, no harm was done. But still.As for the series ...If the Cubs can somehow beat Kershaw - certainly not an outrageous notion given that his third-highest career WHIP is against the Cubs and that the Cubs beat him in the NLCS just a year ago - then things get really interesting. If I'm a Dodgers fan, I'm not sure how much faith I have in Hill or Darvish to close out the series. Then again, if I'm a Cubs fan, I'm not sure how much faith I have in any of my hitters, not to mention my bullpen and a couple of my starters.
It's clearly what you were insinuating.
Cmon really? Quit complaining. What is wrong with the LF umpire making a foul tip call.