collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500  (Read 10974 times)

Celtic Truth

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
  • THE TRUTH
Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« on: October 03, 2014, 10:31:12 AM »
@GoodmanESPN: “@JRengstorf: @GoodmanESPN  Can Buzz finish above 500 in his first year at VaTech” Nope — even though its cupcake city in non-league slate.

I agree, I think and hope that the hokies will struggle

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22188
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2014, 11:16:29 AM »
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


chapman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5746
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2014, 11:36:56 AM »
Goodman knows his pal doesn't know how to win unless he's picked to do poorly.   ;)

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16020
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2014, 11:40:53 AM »
Runnin' interference for when Bumstead finishes 5 above .500 and over achieves, aina?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Wally Schroeder

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2014, 11:43:21 AM »
You don't say? I thought for sure they were instant ACC title contenders when they hired Brent and Satchel decided to join him.

Kidding aside, it would be nice to have Satchel's length on this year's team.

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2014, 11:45:18 AM »
Whenever I see a thread about Buzz or VT I classify it as trolling. It absolutely will devolve into the petty personal rivalries between posters that are ruining the board. It also has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the team that we actually are here to discuss.

So, bravo troll, bravo.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2014, 11:46:22 AM »
Buzz will do well at VT.

He's a great underdog coach.

His biggest challenge will be maintaining success without burning down everybody and everything around him.


wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17577
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2014, 11:51:24 AM »
Whenever I see a thread about Buzz or VT I classify it as trolling. It absolutely will devolve into the petty personal rivalries between posters that are ruining the board. It also has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the team that we actually are here to discuss.

So, bravo troll, bravo.

There would be about 5 total posts during the offseason then.  The thread title made it clear what this thread was about.  Feel free to avoid it if it bothers you.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2014, 11:56:53 AM »
There would be about 5 total posts during the offseason then.  The thread title made it clear what this thread was about.  Feel free to avoid it if it bothers you.

When he left, his departure was relevant to Marquette basketball. Now that he's gone, his success, failure, or otherwise has no bearing on Marquette's success or failure. I fail to see how it's relevant in anyway to board. Put it in the Superbar if you guys want to argue with Chicos about Buzz.

I guess all I have to do is wait about six years and we'll stop bringing it up every day (the Crean posts have thinned out) but instead we'll just be reading about what Wojo is doing on the recruiting trail at Duke instead.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17577
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2014, 11:59:40 AM »
When he left, his departure was relevant to Marquette basketball. Now that he's gone, his success, failure, or otherwise has no bearing on Marquette's success or failure. I fail to see how it's relevant in anyway to board. Put it in the Superbar if you guys want to argue with Chicos about Buzz.

I guess all I have to do is wait about six years and we'll stop bringing it up every day (the Crean posts have thinned out) but instead we'll just be reading about what Wojo is doing on the recruiting trail at Duke instead.

Again, you clicked on a thread that you clearly didn't want to see.  Your choice.  Don't complain about it.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:14 PM »
Ah yes the don't mind the spam because you don't have to click on it argument. Bulletproof.

MUCam

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2014, 12:26:30 PM »
Ah yes the don't mind the spam because you don't have to click on it argument. Bulletproof.

Well at least you haven't caused this thread to devolve into some petty rivalry about whether or not you are correct in your initial assertion.

Bravo to you, counselor. Bravo.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17577
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2014, 12:34:10 PM »
Ah yes the don't mind the spam because you don't have to click on it argument. Bulletproof.

It says right in the thread title "buzz."  You clearly don't like reading Buzz threads.  Not hard to see and avoid it.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2014, 12:37:36 PM »
Just looked at their non-conference schedule. Good lord it may be the weakest schedule I have ever seen from a power conference. That being said I'm looking forward to the Buzz and DJ Newbill reunion. Think Newbill drops 30?

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2014, 12:42:07 PM »
How dare I point out that these threads add nothing to the board?

79Warrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4105
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2014, 12:49:05 PM »
Buzz will do well at VT.

He's a great underdog coach.

His biggest challenge will be maintaining success without burning down everybody and everything around him.



He will do ok there. Buzz will have them competitive in a few years. Will he get them to challenge for an ACC banner, not so sure.

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10473
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2014, 12:51:01 PM »
He will do ok there. Buzz will have them competitive in a few years. Will he get them to challenge for an ACC banner, not so sure.

Not sure about this.  That conference has true blue bloods in Duke and UNC and Cuse. Then there's already a massive crowd of good teams. I think that he might field teams that's be good in other conferences but will struggle to break through the pack in the ACC
Maigh Eo for Sam

muarmy81

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1003
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2014, 01:00:14 PM »
Not sure about this.  That conference has true blue bloods in Duke and UNC and Cuse. Then there's already a massive crowd of good teams. I think that he might field teams that's be good in other conferences but will struggle to break through the pack in the ACC

Agreed.  UVA is getting better and Bennett has a head start on Buzz...in VA to boot and isn't Louisville now part of the ACC?
Duke, UNC, Cuse, UVA, Louisville.  I think Buzz will have Va Tech in the next "group" in about 3-4 years.

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2014, 01:04:51 PM »
Agreed.  UVA is getting better and Bennett has a head start on Buzz...in VA to boot and isn't Louisville now part of the ACC?
Duke, UNC, Cuse, UVA, Louisville.  I think Buzz will have Va Tech in the next "group" in about 3-4 years.

Dont forget about Pitt too. Va Tech is in a heap of trouble.

brandx

  • Guest
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2014, 01:36:35 PM »
Dont forget about Pitt too. Va Tech is in a heap of trouble.

Agreed. Best case scenario middle of the pack in the ACC and even that will be hard to achieve. Built schedule 10 bunnies each year and the record will look OK.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2014, 01:53:59 PM »
He will do ok there. Buzz will have them competitive in a few years. Will he get them to challenge for an ACC banner, not so sure.

Right, I mean, "do well" is subjective.

VTech is traditionally a program that struggles, so getting them to the tournament 2 or 3 times out of 5 years would be doing pretty well.


mu03eng

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5049
    • Scrambled Eggs Podcast
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2014, 01:54:12 PM »
@GoodmanESPN: “@JRengstorf: @GoodmanESPN  Can Buzz finish above 500 in his first year at VaTech” Nope — even though its cupcake city in non-league slate.

I agree, I think and hope that the hokies will struggle

"A Plan? Oh man, I hate plans. That means were gonna have to do stuff. Can't we just have a strategy......or a mission statement."

Golden Avalanche

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3164
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2014, 03:40:07 PM »
Right, I mean, "do well" is subjective.

VTech is traditionally a program that struggles, so getting them to the tournament 2 or 3 times out of 5 years would be doing pretty well.

This.

And it's the only reason Buzz took the job. He gets to leave a place that wouldn't let him do whatever he wanted any more for a place that will be overjoyed with the prospect of a 20-12 campaign that nets them an 11 seed twice in his five seasons at the helm.

MU B2002

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2112
  • Father to future alums in 2029 & 2037.
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2014, 03:49:10 PM »
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

source?

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2014, 04:22:38 PM »
Whenever I see a thread about Buzz or VT I classify it as trolling. It absolutely will devolve into the petty personal rivalries between posters that are ruining the board. It also has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the team that we actually are here to discuss.

So, bravo troll, bravo.

Lawyers. Always gotta be cynics.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #25 on: October 03, 2014, 08:13:09 PM »
And remember, death is not an option.

Virginia Tech vs. Notre Dame
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16020
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #26 on: October 03, 2014, 08:29:28 PM »
Put IU in the equation and the choice is easier, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

NotBuzzWilliams

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #27 on: October 03, 2014, 08:31:15 PM »
At some point, you have to make a transition from believer of the dream to buyer of the dream. No dream comes true w/o somebody paying for it.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23825
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #28 on: October 03, 2014, 08:50:55 PM »
Has anyone actually predicted that VT goes OVER .500?
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

Newsdreams

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9574
  • Goal - Win BE
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #29 on: October 03, 2014, 09:52:19 PM »
When he left, his departure was relevant to Marquette basketball. Now that he's gone, his success, failure, or otherwise has no bearing on Marquette's success or failure. I fail to see how it's relevant in anyway to board. Put it in the Superbar if you guys want to argue with Chicos about Buzz.

I guess all I have to do is wait about six years and we'll stop bringing it up every day (the Crean posts have thinned out) but instead we'll just be reading about what Wojo is doing on the recruiting trail at Duke instead.
TC $ucks!
Goal is National Championship

Wally Schroeder

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #30 on: October 04, 2014, 06:32:52 AM »
Has anyone actually predicted that VT goes OVER .500?

February 2011 - after VA Tech upset # 1 Duke, Dickie V. predicted they'd win the ACC tournament handily and go on to win the NCAA Tournament in dominating fashion, finishing well above .500. But alas, it wasn't meant to be. Instead they advanced to the NIT where the they ran into the Wichita State Shockers, who upended the Hokies in the second round. The program had been in a downward spiral even since, until that fateful day in March when their savior was announced.

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7417
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #31 on: October 04, 2014, 08:19:10 AM »
@GoodmanESPN: “@JRengstorf: @GoodmanESPN  Can Buzz finish above 500 in his first year at VaTech” Nope — even though its cupcake city in non-league slate.

I agree, I think and hope that the hokies will struggle

You know who LOVES this tweet?  Coach Bert Williams.   Terrible expectations are precisely what he wants.  Then he goes .500 and wins a couple big games and whammo, he's an f'ing genius again.

And ..
Again, you clicked on a thread that you clearly didn't want to see.  Your choice.  Don't complain about it.

+100000.  Why do people do this?   I mean, on a UW board they have time between filling the fry machine and flipping the nuggets, but here?   Please tell us you have something better to do than take time out of your day to post how you'd rather not see this thread after clicking on it.

Texas Western

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #32 on: October 04, 2014, 10:52:15 AM »
When he left, his departure was relevant to Marquette basketball. Now that he's gone, his success, failure, or otherwise has no bearing on Marquette's success or failure. I fail to see how it's relevant in anyway to board. Put it in the Superbar if you guys want to argue with Chicos about Buzz.

I guess all I have to do is wait about six years and we'll stop bringing it up every day (the Crean posts have thinned out) but instead we'll just be reading about what Wojo is doing on the recruiting trail at Duke instead.
I want to see all alumni of our program do well. coaches and players . Even though I was disappointed at what Buzz devolved to last year, would still like to see an ex coach fate well.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #33 on: October 04, 2014, 06:13:32 PM »
I want to see all alumni of our program do well. coaches and players . Even though I was disappointed at what Buzz devolved to last year, would still like to see an ex coach fate well.

+1.

Spotcheck Billy

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2238
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2014, 09:01:37 AM »
I want to see all alumni of our program do well. coaches and players . Even though I was disappointed at what Buzz devolved to last year, would still like to see an ex coach fate well.

-1

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #35 on: October 06, 2014, 09:26:40 AM »
You know who LOVES this tweet?  Coach Bert Williams.   Terrible expectations are precisely what he wants.  Then he goes .500 and wins a couple big games and whammo, he's an f'ing genius again.

And ..
+100000.  Why do people do this?   I mean, on a UW board they have time between filling the fry machine and flipping the nuggets, but here?   Please tell us you have something better to do than take time out of your day to post how you'd rather not see this thread after clicking on it.

Flipping the nuggets?
Have some patience, FFS.

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17577
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #36 on: October 06, 2014, 10:02:31 AM »
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #37 on: October 06, 2014, 10:14:30 AM »

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #38 on: October 06, 2014, 11:07:04 AM »
Finally a genuinely funny post.

I said when Buzz left and I stand by it, he will do well at Va. Tech and I wish him the best.  Va Tech will allow him to be "creative" that he wasn't going to get away with here any longer.  The jilted love actions here about a prior coach leaving, no thanks.  I'm more concerned about what he did at MU, the good and the bad....Buzz did some really good things here and he also did some crap that I and others are not happy with.  It is what it is.  He isn't here any longer, he'll do fine down South.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #39 on: October 06, 2014, 11:37:05 AM »
I said when Buzz left and I stand by it, he will do well at Va. Tech and I wish him the best.  Va Tech will allow him to be "creative" that he wasn't going to get away with here any longer.  The jilted love actions here about a prior coach leaving, no thanks.  I'm more concerned about what he did at MU, the good and the bad....Buzz did some really good things here and he also did some crap that I and others are not happy with.  It is what it is.  He isn't here any longer, he'll do fine down South.

For a guy who wasn't wild about Buzz from the start this is a fair post. This is "good Chico" talking, and you have certainly said these things. Sadly, the vast majority of your posts on the topic have been made by "bad Chico" - have your guy do an audit.

seakm4

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 488
Re: Goodman thinks buzz and VT go below .500
« Reply #40 on: October 07, 2014, 12:32:10 AM »


Jay Cutler is...right?!?!?!?  My brain hurts.