Scholarship table
I'd like to see a 7-ft, 3-pt-marksman aircraft carrier who can run the point. In a blender, if possible.
I just don't get why Shaka didn't get Wemby.
Are we talking about adding depth or taking minutes from our projected starters?I would think a big would be good for depth.Adding a starting pg would mean (most likely) Chase coming off the bench again. Adding a starting 4/5 would have a similar effect on Jop/Gold.I am happy going into next year with what we have plus filling the last schollie available with size.
"Honest question-Are you suggesting that a transfer "with size" would be happy coming off the bench?" I don't know if it is possible, but I would think there is someone who would take the compromise of some NIL + being on a good team and making a contribution.
If we could get a 4-5 stud, then Jolpin could go back to sixth man where he excelled.
Assume MU has one scholarship. Do you want a PG or size?
Both are needed. So regrettably someone should go if our priority is to progress further. To assume any human can with 100% accuracy pick players that can perform at a high level and play team basketball is unrealistic. Mistakes are made by the best of us. Shaka is no exception.
Who should go? Do you think Shaka will change his M.O.? (regarding "high level and team basketball")What mistake(s) do you think Shaka made?
I doubt he will change his M.O. but some adjustment given different circumstances would show some flexibility. It is never pleasant to let someone go but it is also unpleasant to sit on the bench except for minutes when the game is already decided. As to who that should be is obvious to me at this point. I am confident, since you asked the question, you disagree which is fine.
How is having a stable roster a mistake?