Oso planning to go pro
Bennett fined and suspended indefinitely. For a fight at camp? there's gotta be more to the story, right?
Little more than just a fight. He picked their first round pick him up and body slammed him.
Most coaches like to see a few fights in camp. Good one in GB yesterday. Punches thrown, then broken up and practice continues as normal.
Then most coaches need to retire and/or die. You cannot find turning to violence as an acceptable solution to problems and then turn around and expect the players to not find it acceptable in their personal lives.
Sarcasm?
None at all. No need for the Neanderthal mindset in today's NFL.
Blocking and tackling are awful aggressive, too.And ball carriers trying to run people over? That translates very easily to domestic violence. Ray Rice would never have punched his wife senseless if that aggression didn't carry over to home.(Hopefully teal isn't necessary.)
Which is ironic, because on-field aggression gets a harsher penalty than off-field aggression.
I see that GB has the lowest percentage in the entire league of players left over from the 2011 % 2012 drafts.I have my opinion, but do you see this as a good thing or bad?
Been listening to 1250 AM a lot recently, hey?
For all the Cutler lovers/defenders out there, he better produce some results this season. If he can't win with the talent around him this year, he will never win anything significant. All the Bears lovers say Marshall is better than Jordy and that Marshall and Jeffreys is better than Jordy and Cobb. Bennett is clearly more proven than any tight end on the Packers roster, and Forte is said to be a top 4 running back in the league. So if I'm hearing all of this correctly, then the Bears have the better wide receiving group with Holmes in the fold now, the better first tight end, and the better running back. Given all of that, you would think it would be NFC North Title or bust, plus a legitimate chance to win the Super Bowl this year, correct?
Yup, that all sounds about right Wade. Thanks for agreeing. Add a much improved defense and you attempt at snide commentary is spot on.
There was nothing snide about it. Evidently the Bears have a better group of skill position players (they have the better players at each and every skill position, after all), the Packers defense has been absolutely brutal since the Super Bowl season, and the Packers special teams are always, well, "special," so given all that either Cutler will never win anything as a quarterback (like I have been saying) and the Packers will once again be the best team in the NFC North, or the Bears will win the NFC North and have a legitimate shot to win the Super Bowl. So what it comes down to is whether Cutler is so bad that Rodgers alone can make up for the gap in every other area, or whether Cutler is good enough to win. Not snide, logical.
Well, last year was the first year in many that the Bears had a "top" offense, with aforementioned skill players. And despite your assertions that the Packers D was a dumpster fire, the Bears was worse, ratings wise. A bit better in Pass D, but dead last by a SIGNIFICANT margin in Rushing D. Cutler was good enough last year to win the Bears "something", but a historically bad (by Bears standards) defense held them back.As ChitownWarrior said, nobody in Chicago disagrees with you. Its a put up or shut up year, perception wise for Cutler. And despite the fun that Packers fans like to have with it, nobody is directly comparing Cutler with the best QB in the NFL, so thats where the snide comments come in. But to insinuate that the Bears have been better everywhere, except for QB, the last few years is asinine. I would agree that they have more talent around Cutler on offense than Rodgers has around him, but there are still MAJOR questions on defense. This isn't college where you can outshoot teams like Baylor or Texas Tech and win games 55-48.