Oso planning to go pro
It could come out that Wojo flat out texted every player saying "Shakas a good guy, you committed to MU the place not me as the coach, give him a shot!" and people would still $hit on him rather than give him an ounce of credit. Not worth your time to argue.
Sorry for taking a Cole attitude but in the last two games against top competition MU was never in the game with UCONN and squeaked out a W at home against Xavier with last second heroics by O-Max. Just saying, if MU makes an early exit in the tournament, it is not like the signs weren't there.
One thing in sales 101 you must not have learned it that it is much easier to keep a customer versus finding a new one.
I don't always buy into Shot Quality score stuff, but this one made me very glad Oso got that tip to fall.ShotQuality ScoreMU: 87X: 62Per SQ, MU wins that game 97% of the time. There were an absurd amount of misses that have been makes all season. Or listen to Synergy:Expected PPS: 0.95Actual PPS: 0.84Diff: -0.11This was MU's worst shooting night by a country mile. Lots to nitpick from the past 5 games, of course, and expect Kalk to drop on Oso just like Nunge did, which takes away all the cuts and doubles every drive. But I would not bank on Kam going 2/14 in his life again.
Who got the tip?
Yes, you are correct about the above. Shaka has given credit and due to Wojo/the previous staff for their recruitment of Kam/Stevie (Shaka was actively recruiting Oso while at Texas). My post that was giving you sh*t was more from the perspective that it is likely Shaka would have filled those open slots (had any/all of Kam, Stevie, Oso left) with capable players and have us succeeding at a high level - though perhaps not this high - nor with players that may have been as likable as Kam, Stevie and Oso.Though I hated Wojo, I was still a die-hard (but very disappointed) MU fan. So, respect to you for being a die-hard fan too.
Aw man, leaving that mistake in my shame.
21-6. Not much concerns me about this team. Conference play is supposed to be a meat grinder. While you are correct that the offense hasn't been as efficient lately, MU has found ways to win. That is good. it is entirely possible and even likely that Creighton holds serve on Tuesday. That will not cause me worry, either. Beating a ranked team in their gym is a big ask. Don't get hurt, take in the process.Finally, this. Three first year players, three second year players, three third year players. This is a very young team. As good as they have been, there are still lessons to be learned and growth to strive for. There will be flat spots. Not many so far, to be sure. Enjoy the ride.
You're right. Shaka is only winning because of the stocked cupboard he inherited from Wojo. Facepalm. Wojo wasn't the lead recruiter on Oso, Kam, or Stevie (and I don't think Justin either.). Shaka had to re-recruit those guys to MU, they were free to transfer anywhere they wanted when Wojo left. The best thing that could have happened to MU and Oso, Kam, and Stevie was Wojo getting fired and Shaka getting hired.Sidenote: Wojo's best asset was hiring recruiting aces as assistant coaches, and organizing lunch ball amongst them.
I posted this elsewhere, Xavier had 3 guys who were in their 5th season of college ball and another that was in his 3rd. This does not include Freemantle. Gives you perspective as to how young MU is.
Big difference with this year over last year is MU should have a much more favorable seed this season. The losses at Butler and DePaul likely cost a MU a legitimate chance of getting an NCAA last season. They have not shot the ball well of late but have found ways to win. I would add, if many MU fans did not have the "past February fade" fear, I think there would be a more optimistic spin on finding ways to win with their B or C game. I am quite happy they found ways to win without playing their basketball. IMO, that was very good programs do on a regular basis.
Is it concerning to anyone else that 3/4 (and 4/6) of our worst AdjO and ef% games have come since 2/1?
I'm not gonna get snarky with you, just gonna implore you to look around at what's happening in the Big East and all of college hoops.Even the top programs are losing to theoretically lesser teams or squeaking out close wins. I mean, if Houston has an early exit, the sign was there in their home loss to Temple; if Alabama has an early exit, the sign was there in their 100-point loss to Oklahoma; if Purdue has an early exit, the signs were there in their losses to Northwestern and Maryland; if Kansas has an early exit, the signs were there in their 3-game January losing streak.And those are just the projected 1 seeds on bracketmatrix. Don't look at Marquette in a vacuum, take a look all around.Shaka is doing a tremendous job, and all of the players -- regardless of who recruited them initially -- are working their butts off. Just enjoy the journey and don't worry too much about the destination yet.
I won't speak for anyone else, but I'm not looking at things from a single data point.Advanced stats have said our offense/shooting is trending down.Let's hope it trends back up!
IMO, the big difference in the offense is that it is taking longer to get a wide open shot. I still think they are getting open looks, just taking longer and not shooting as well. Prior to the past couple of weeks our best offense went in spurts, and it was a domino effect.They have not had many 5-6 minute spurts of late and has slowed down the output. They had a couple against DePaul and Georgetown and scored in bunches. Scoring in bunches changes a game quickly and MU has done very well at that up until recently.
In the Butler game, the ball got stagnant on a lot of possessions.In the Xavier game, it moved better and oftentimes, they got mismatches for the offense. OMax in particular should have been more aggressive but was never comfortable until late.
It's the lack of aggressiveness. Feels like some players are a but hesitant to shoot. Shame because I think quick shot Omax is better than "has time omax"