Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


The Sultan

So after all the headlines and bluster, Kevin Warren accomplished exactly nothing with the Illinois legislature. So it is either take the deal in Hammond, or do everything in Arlington Heights on their own dime.

Brilliant stuff.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Jay Bee

The portal is NOT closed.

WhiteTrash

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 08:12:18 AMSo after all the headlines and bluster, Kevin Warren accomplished exactly nothing with the Illinois legislature. So it is either take the deal in Hammond, or do everything in Arlington Heights on their own dime.

Brilliant stuff.
While I not a big supporter of government funding private businesses, I think there are certain cases that some help can create more benefit for the state/city and justify the investment. I could see some level of support from the state of Illinois making sense, but Illinois had run their financial situation into the ground years ago and probably can't afford it. A lost opportunity for AH and Illinois.

Pakuni

#3
Eh ... the Illinois General Assembly can be back in a special session as early as Friday, if they want. I wouldn't say this is over by a long stretch.

The bigger hurdle here may be convincing Arlington Heights that it's in their interests to own a football stadium.


Uncle Rico

The polio vaccine claims another.

Raymond Berry dead at 93
It's only a few pennies

Pakuni

Whoa ... Myles Garrett to the Rams.

Jockey


Dish

Taking Ty Simpson seems very odd if the Rams knew they were all in for 2026.

cheebs09

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 12:35:41 PMWhoa ... Myles Garrett to the Rams.

Now Haslem can focus on trading Giannis.

GB Warrior

Quote from: cheebs09 on Today at 01:08:10 PMNow Haslem can focus on trading Giannis.

Trade comp for Garrett looks a lot like Giannis for Chet

Uncle Rico

Give the Rams this, they're bold as hell.
It's only a few pennies

Pakuni

Quote from: Dish on Today at 12:59:08 PMTaking Ty Simpson seems very odd if the Rams knew they were all in for 2026.

Or, they figured they're going to be very good for the next two years and won't have another chance to draft a potential starting QB by the time Stafford retires after the 2027 season.

The Sultan

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 08:51:54 AMEh ... the Illinois General Assembly can be back in a special session as early as Friday, if they want. I wouldn't say this is over by a long stretch.

The bigger hurdle here may be convincing Arlington Heights that it's in their interests to own a football stadium.


It's not "over" sure, but it just looks like there is no leverage. Hammond just isn't viable and everyone knows the McCaskeys don't want to be there - and I doubt the NFL wants them there either. I am sure they will throw a bone at the Bears, but it won't be the deal they wanted.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Dish

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 02:21:02 PMOr, they figured they're going to be very good for the next two years and won't have another chance to draft a potential starting QB by the time Stafford retires after the 2027 season.

Sure, but the "eff dem draft picks" team to make that decision is odd to say the least.

Why not utilize an inexpensive asset to solidify your 2026 strategy? That doesn't even begin to question whether or not Simpson is even good.


MU82

As a Seahawks fan, I'm hoping the Rams get every bit as much of a postseason return in Year 1 of the trade as the Packers got from the Parsons trade.

Seriously, quite a move by the Rams. If their best players stay healthy, they should be the NFL's best team.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Uncle Rico

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 02:56:44 PMAs a Seahawks fan, I'm hoping the Rams get every bit as much of a postseason return in Year 1 of the trade as the Packers got from the Parsons trade.

Seriously, quite a move by the Rams. If their best players stay healthy, they should be the NFL's best team.

Not if they have to play in Bears weather
It's only a few pennies

Pakuni

Quote from: Dish on Today at 02:37:06 PMSure, but the "eff dem draft picks" team to make that decision is odd to say the least.

Why not utilize an inexpensive asset to solidify your 2026 strategy? That doesn't even begin to question whether or not Simpson is even good.



Oh, sure, I get why people question it. And it's a fair question. I'm just tossing out a possible explanation for it. Not terribly different from what the Packers did in 2020. Which, on the one hand, you can say worked out great because they got themselves another legit QB1. On the other hand, maybe they stay put, draft Tee Higgins and L'Jarius Sneed with their picks, and that gets them to another Super Bowl with Rodgers.

GB Warrior

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 02:56:44 PMAs a Seahawks fan, I'm hoping the Rams get every bit as much of a postseason return in Year 1 of the trade as the Packers got from the Parsons trade.

Seriously, quite a move by the Rams. If their best players stay healthy, they should be the NFL's best team.

Injury aside, Parsons was a better deal than this. Verse isn't elite but he's no slouch and certainly not on the back nine of his career like Clark was.

Probably accounted for the fact that Garrett is a better player (for at least the next year or two)

Pakuni

Quote from: GB Warrior on Today at 03:57:39 PMInjury aside, Parsons was a better deal than this. Verse isn't elite but he's no slouch and certainly not on the back nine of his career like Clark was.

Probably accounted for the fact that Garrett is a better player (for at least the next year or two)

Also, Garrett is locked in on a contract with very reasonable cap hits for the next three seasons ... $8.1 million this year, $16 million in 2028, $21.4 million in 2029. Parsons needed to be paid.

The Sultan

Parsons is also three years younger than Garrett.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

MU82

It was a great trade for the Rams, who despite not getting immediate value out of their 2026 #1 draft pick, have had a superb offseason and now appear to have no offensive or defensive weaknesses.

The Seahawks are still a formidable team, but I'd objectively rate the Rams as division favorites.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

GB Warrior

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 04:18:30 PMAlso, Garrett is locked in on a contract with very reasonable cap hits for the next three seasons ... $8.1 million this year, $16 million in 2028, $21.4 million in 2029. Parsons needed to be paid.

Great point here.

Previous topic - Next topic