SCOTUS Leak

[pacearrow02]

https://mobile.twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1521295411545260035

Barricades up around the Supreme Court building right now because of this leak.  We are falling apart at the seams as a country right now.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JeremyDBoreing/status/1521304307538309120

[Pakuni]

https://mobile.twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1521295411545260035

Barricades up around the Supreme Court building right now because of this leak.  We are falling apart at the seams as a country right now.

Yeah, the leak is the problem here. 🙄
You're nothing if not consistent.  Consistently wrong, but consistent nonetheless.

[pacearrow02]

Yeah, the leak is the problem here. 🙄
You're nothing if not consistent.  Consistently wrong, but consistent nonetheless.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1521305214552350726

The leak is exactly the problem.  I understand you don't agree with what appears to be the majority opinion but this sets a crazy precedent.  They're openly calling for "burning the place down" knowing fill well the severity of this leak snd you come out with this predictable hot take.

[pacearrow02]

Yeah, the leak is the problem here. 🙄
You're nothing if not consistent.  Consistently wrong, but consistent nonetheless.

https://mobile.twitter.com/matthewschmitz/status/1521299231641948162

Dangerous game this clerk started.

[Mucubfan]

Seems like the precedent was actually set almost 16 months ago...

[Pakuni]

https://mobile.twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1521305214552350726

The leak is exactly the problem.  I understand you don't agree with what appears to be the majority opinion but this sets a crazy precedent.  They're openly calling for "burning the place down" knowing fill well the severity of this leak snd you come out with this predictable hot take.

The fact you claim to be worried about "precedent" here is unintentionally hilarious.
And you remain pathetically wrong.

[pacearrow02]

Seems like the precedent was actually set almost 16 months ago...

How so?

[pacearrow02]

The fact you claim to be worried about "precedent" here is unintentionally hilarious.
And you remain pathetically wrong.

Has this ever happened before?  I'm not aware of a SCOTUS opinion being leaked much less one of this magnitude.  What do you think was the goal to leak it?

[Pakuni]

https://mobile.twitter.com/matthewschmitz/status/1521299231641948162

Dangerous game this clerk started.

1. You have no idea who leaked this.
2. The danger here is five justices who lie about stare decisis and show no respect for long settled law.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Has this ever happened before?  I'm not aware of a SCOTUS opinion being leaked much less one of this magnitude.  What do you think was the goal to leak it?

[Mucubfan]

How so?

Maybe it's the weed...

If the concern is that people will come to the Supreme Court and riot because of political disagreement, then it happening now is not the precedent. It's the new norm. Only this time, the steal is real (read: stolen Supreme Court seat that should be our current AG) and the hurt party is women across the country, not the fragile former president.

[GB Warrior]

https://mobile.twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1521305214552350726

The leak is exactly the problem.  I understand you don't agree with what appears to be the majority opinion but this sets a crazy precedent.  They're openly calling for "burning the place down" knowing fill well the severity of this leak snd you come out with this predictable hot take.

Do it

[forgetful]

1. You have no idea who leaked this.
2. The danger here is five justices who lie about stare decisis and show no respect for long settled law.

Regardless of which side of the decision one is on. This one is a big problem.

These justices, especially the ones recently seated, deliberately lied under oath to congress to get confirmed (neither would have been confirmed if they had answered the way they are voting now).

It confirms what a lot of people already feared, that the justices are just political operatives and do not care about the rule of law.

[forgetful]

Also, in before the lock. No way this stays above board.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

Do it

Yeah, you can tell by the live shots that the protesters are extremely close to burning it down with their candles.

[TSmith34, Inc.]

It confirms what a lot of people already feared, that the justices are just political operatives and do not care about the rule of law.

^This.

[jficke13]

ah yes, the studied concern for the rule of law, the conventions of the Supreme Court, and a critical understanding of both from noted serious person PaceArrow. I'll calibrate my reaction to the reality of the thing based entirely on how tightly you are clutching your pearls.

[MuggsyB]

This is a total s-show regardless of what political party you generally support.

[pacearrow02]

ah yes, the studied concern for the rule of law, the conventions of the Supreme Court, and a critical understanding of both from noted serious person PaceArrow. I'll calibrate my reaction to the reality of the thing based entirely on how tightly you are clutching your pearls.

Never claimed to be an expert.  You obviously know waaaaayyyyy more in this space.  Are you aware of anything like this happening before?

[pacearrow02]

Maybe it's the weed...

If the concern is that people will come to the Supreme Court and riot because of political disagreement, then it happening now is not the precedent. It's the new norm. Only this time, the steal is real (read: stolen Supreme Court seat that should be our current AG) and the hurt party is women across the country, not the fragile former president.

Christ, not everything is about Trump.

[Mucubfan]

This is a total s-show regardless of what political party you generally support.

Really? Because this is what one party has been warning about and what the other party has been literally saying it was going to ensure happened. The exception being when the now justices decreed that they would leave this ruling alone. Weird huh?

All the "regardless of party" stuff is ridiculous. Watch democracy die and throw your hands saying, "it's both sides". Also, don't talk about it here. This is a basketball place. Pretend your country isn't dying in front of you. Also, how about that new recruit? Cool huh?

[MU82]

The Handmaid's Tale: SCOTUS Leaks on Women's Rights

[ZiggysFryBoy]

Really? Because this is what one party has been warning about and what the other party has been literally saying it was going to ensure happened. The exception being when the now justices decreed that they would leave this ruling alone. Weird huh?

All the "regardless of party" stuff is ridiculous. Watch democracy die and throw your hands saying, "it's both sides". Also, don't talk about it here. This is a basketball place. Pretend your country isn't dying in front of you. Also, how about that new recruit? Cool huh?

You probably shouldn't post when you've had weed.

[pacearrow02]

You probably shouldn't post when you've had weed.

Haha 💯

[Mucubfan]

Christ, not everything is about Trump.

You are correct here. It's also about Rupert Murdoch.