The Petito Story

[jficke13]

Yeah, that one was pretty obviously sarcasm.

Apparently I didn't go hard enough on it.

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

I'm the only person that "shifts goalposts" on a thread?  Gimmie a break FBM.  You should welcome all discourse.

I don't appreciate intellectual dishonesty, which is what you are engaging in right now.

[MuggsyB]

I don't appreciate intellectual dishonesty, which is what you are engaging in right now.

LOL.  When I think  of  intellectual honesty my first thought is Joe Biden and Jen Psaki.  It's not my fault FBM that you support a clown show and only want people parroting your takes. 

[TSmith34, Inc.]

LOL.  When I think  of  intellectual honesty my first thought is Joe Biden and Jen Psaki.  It's not my fault FBM that you support a clown show and only want people parroting your takes.

This message sponsored by:

[The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole]

LOL.  When I think  of  intellectual honesty my first thought is Joe Biden and Jen Psaki.  It's not my fault FBM that you support a clown show and only want people parroting your takes. 

No, you are doing it again.  Very sad.  Let's review...

When I said that no one was screaming racism when it comes to covering this story, and that it was just pointing out bias, you changed the subject to inner-city violence and said that "no one ever talks about it."

So you changed topics AND said something demonstrably false.

When multiple people pointed out that what you said was false, you changed your argument AGAIN, and then made multiple political comments.  For what reason?  Perhaps it's a defense mechanism you use instead of taking the L when it was warranted?  Who knows.

I have no desire to have people parroting my takes.  I have a desire for people to use the intellect and logic they supposedly learned at my alma mater.  Right now, you are falling short.  Be better.

[Pakuni]

This message sponsored by:

[Galway Eagle]

No, you are doing it again.  Very sad.  Let's review...

When I said that no one was screaming racism when it comes to covering this story, and that it was just pointing out bias, you changed the subject to inner-city violence and said that "no one ever talks about it."

So you changed topics AND said something demonstrably false.

When multiple people pointed out that what you said was false, you changed your argument AGAIN, and then made multiple political comments.  For what reason?  Perhaps it's a defense mechanism you use instead of taking the L when it was warranted?  Who knows.

I have no desire to have people parroting my takes.  I have a desire for people to use the intellect and logic they supposedly learned at my alma mater.  Right now, you are falling short.  Be better.

If             then PoLiTiCs!