[mubbPAC] The Case Against Steve Wojciechowski: Enough is Enough

[MuggsyB]

Seeing MU fans band together like this is inspiring.  Shows what a passionate fan base we are.  Enough is enough!

One thing is certain:  If Wojo's back next year, he'll have the hottest seat in the country.

Yes SV!!

We will be back.

But continue to attack

[cheese ball chaser]

Uh uh. Tower and Tamu and the other defenders need to start researching for better excuses.
That said, Hausergate is what finally did it for me, and a number here tended to slough that off.

Now it certainly is up to the ghost powers that be to make a decision. It may already be too late.

While people can post their opinions on MU BB here, right now the most important and central focus should be: what now?

TAMU has been very clear that he wants Wojo to be fired.

[f/k/a humanlung]

Now THAT'S an article.  Well done!

Fluffy, do we actually agree on something???

[The Lens]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

[panda]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

That guy is a certified moron. How can you possibly sit back and think you have a zinger comeback, with - WHO WOULD WE HIRE? How about a coach with a pulse?

[NickelDimer]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

Chicos has never met a starchy white dude he wouldn't back

[brewcity77]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

Clearly he doesn't get that it was never our intent to fire all our guns in one shot.

[willie warrior]

No, we don't.

Guess you have not read a lot of his and your excusing posts.
But good defense attorney comeback, "No we don't"
Ride the green horse.

[panda]

Clearly he doesn't get that it was never our intent to fire all our guns in one shot.

Save money on the coaching search firm - Hire the mubbPAC !

[Uncle Rico]

Guess you have not read a lot of his and your excusing posts.
But good defense attorney comeback, "No we don't"
Ride the green horse.

I do read them.  Just because every post isn't about the coach doesn't mean anyone is excusing anything.  If you're too stupid to understand that, that's on you

[Henry Sugar]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

Chicos got kicked off Cracked Sidewalks ages ago. Just like he got kicked off Scoop. He is NOT a contributor.

[The Lens]

Chicos got kicked off Cracked Sidewalks ages ago. Just like he got kicked off Scoop. He is NOT a contributor.

My bad, I thought I recently saw his name under contributors but I realize he's not listed anymore. 

[swoopem]

Cracked Sidewalks Contributor Chico Bail Bonds is flying around twitter saying: WHO WOULD WE HIRE, WHO WOULD WE HIRE?

That's when you know the Fire Wojo article is well written, no complaints with the content, just pretending to make up a problem.  There are dozens and dozens of assistant coaches that could outperform Steve.

Didn't Chico's always brag that he didn't Twitter and found it "creepy" for folks that did?

[Uncle Rico]

My bad, I thought I recently saw his name under contributors but I realize he's not listed anymore.

It's a fair question to ask "who's next?".  I ask that all the time and we end up down the rabbit hole of unrealistic expectations.

That wasn't the point of what was written, though.  What was written laid out a convincing case of why the current coach isn't the guy to lead Marquette.  It's classic Chico's to distract from the issue at hand to about hypotheticals.  There's no doubt the next guy could be worse.  That doesn't excuse the current guy.  Expecting different results from the current guy because they next guy could be worse is running in place.

We can discuss candidates and their worth.  We don't know how they'll do, though we can extrapolate how they may do.  What we do know is, the current guy isn't it and has shown us no reason to think otherwise

[ChitownSpaceForRent]

Didn't Chico's always brag that he didn't Twitter and found it "creepy" for folks that did?

Chicos has followed me on twitter for ages. Think he meant talking to recruits on twitter, which I can understand.

[Henry Sugar]

My bad, I thought I recently saw his name under contributors but I realize he's not listed anymore.

No worries. I just don't want to be affiliated with him. EVER.

Clearly he doesn't get that it was never our intent to fire all our guns in one shot.

Like brew says, we are already working on Part 2

[dgies9156]

Like brew says, we are already working on Part 2

Wow.

I hope you're telling us who the university SHOULD hire.

[willie warrior]

I do read them.  Just because every post isn't about the coach doesn't mean anyone is excusing anything.  If you're too stupid to understand that, that's on you

Yes, I sense you feel that your BS is waning by resorting to name calling. That is a classic bit of deflection. Stupid  sometimes is found in a mirror, sir. But since you have such a high degree of superiority complex about yourself, by all means deflect away. Deflection from your boy Wojo-Dukiets mediocrity might work, but not now. And many of you past posts supported Wojo-Dukiet until recently, and you know it.

Hopefully you will be able to recognize that the goal should be to find the best replacement available, whoever that is, rather than resort to insults. If you dont understand that, then that is on you.

[Uncle Rico]

Yes, I sense you feel that your BS is waning by resorting to name calling. That is a classic bit of deflection. Stupid  sometimes is found in a mirror, sir. But since you have such a high degree of superiority complex about yourself, by all means deflect away. Deflection from your boy Wojo-Dukiets mediocrity might work, but not now. And many of you past posts supported Wojo-Dukiet until recently, and you know it.

Hopefully you will be able to recognize that the goal should be to find the best replacement available, whoever that is, rather than resort to insults. If you dont understand that, then that is on you.

They did support the coach in the past.  I freely admit that.  Plenty of people have admitted that.  Your inability to understand that opinions can change results in you calling them "slurpers" without any fact in basis.  Every topic is interrupted by you calling someone slurpers.  Gets pretty old

[Jockey]

It's a fair question to ask "who's next?".  I ask that all the time and we end up down the rabbit hole of unrealistic expectations.

That wasn't the point of what was written, though.  What was written laid out a convincing case of why the current coach isn't the guy to lead Marquette.  It's classic Chico's to distract from the issue at hand to about hypotheticals.  There's no doubt the next guy could be worse.  That doesn't excuse the current guy.  Expecting different results from the current guy because they next guy could be worse is running in place.

We can discuss candidates and their worth.  We don't know how they'll do, though we can extrapolate how they may do.  What we do know is, the current guy isn't it and has shown us no reason to think otherwise

I would love to discuss "who do we hire NOW".

There are many mid-major HCs and P5 assistants that could do a great job coaching. The question is always "can they recruit big-time (Top 150) players.

As we saw this year, even the "great" ones can't coach without players. Calipari, K, Izzo, Wright, etc.

[Uncle Rico]

I would love to discuss "who do we hire NOW".

There are many mid-major HCs and P5 assistants that could do a great job coaching. The question is always "can they recruit big-time (Top 150) players.

As we saw this year, even the "great" ones can't coach without players. Calipari, K, Izzo, Wright, etc.

Here are a bunch of names I mentioned once before and I added some more

Scott Nagy
Joe Pasternack
Craig Miller
Jeff Boals
Dennis Gates
Pat Kelsey
Porter Moser
Darian Devries
Niko Medved
Mark Schmidt
Wes Miller

[mu03eng]

Wow.

I hope you're telling us who the university SHOULD hire.

There will be some of that, yes......not all change requires the HC to change. If Wojo and/or the admin recognize the need to change the approach, there is still non-Arbys based hope to be had

[rocky_warrior]

There will be some of that, yes......not all change requires the HC to change. If Wojo and/or the admin recognize the need to change the approach, there is still non-Arbys based hope to be had

But without Aby's, why?

[The Sultan]

I do read them.  Just because every post isn't about the coach doesn't mean anyone is excusing anything.  If you're too stupid to understand that, that's on you

Deep thinking isn't a strength of willies. Usually breathing and walking take up most of his brain power.

[Farley36]

Deep thinking isn't a strength of willies. Usually breathing and walking take up most of his brain power.

I heard a rumor that insulting people isn't allowed here.  I'm assuming that rule applies to everyone.