Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Villanova Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 09:14:33 AM]


That Hurt. A lot. by WhiteTrash
[Today at 08:18:26 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by WhiteTrash
[Today at 08:16:40 AM]


Why wasn't Duke Brennan ejected? by tower912
[Today at 08:05:04 AM]


Can this team win 4 in a row at the Garden? by Mu8891
[Today at 07:35:11 AM]


Shaka cost us the game tonite by tower912
[Today at 06:50:43 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by onepost
[February 12, 2026, 10:33:20 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  @ Xavier

Marquette
74
Marquette @
Xavier
Date/Time: Feb 14, 2026, 2:00pm
TV: TNT/TruTV
Schedule for 2025-26
Villanova
77

dgies9156

Every game I watch, there is the repeated discussion about Marquette%u2019s propensity to turn the ball over. I%u2019d agree it%u2019s ugly but the question nobody seems to answer is how ugly is it?

Cracked Sidewalks, are you out there?

Two thoughts to kick this one off. Is there a seasonal statistic governing points off turnovers, similar to football? It would seem that one of the big reasons we%u2019re losing is points off turnovers %u2014 but I really don%u2019t know. Basketball turnovers and floor position don%u2019t as matter as much as they do in football, but for this Marquette team, they probably do!

In other words, where would we be if we were %u201Cnormal%u201D on turnovers? Undefeated? Probably not. But in contention for an NCAA bid? Most likely.

Secondly, what is a %u201Cnormal%u201D level of turnovers? I%u2019d throw this out for consideration. If I were coaching our Warriors, I%u2019d be telling the team I wanted to see net zero turnovers. That means we have as many turnovers as we have takeaways. Teams that have more takeaways than turnovers probably are in the AP Top 10!


panda

Quote from: dgies9156 on February 01, 2021, 07:44:27 AM
Every game I watch, there is the repeated discussion about Marquette's propensity to turn the ball over. I'd agree it's ugly but the question nobody seems to answer is how ugly is it?

Cracked Sidewalks, are you out there?

Two thoughts to kick this one off. Is there a seasonal statistic governing points off turnovers, similar to football? It would seem that one of the big reasons we're losing is points off turnovers — but I really don't know. Basketball turnovers and floor position don't as matter as much as they do in football, but for this Marquette team, the probably do!

In other words, where would we be if we were "normal" on turnovers? Undefeated? Probably not. But in contention for an NCAA bid? Most likely.

Secondly, what is a "normal" level of turnovers? I'd throw this out for consideration. If I were coaching our Warriors, I'd be telling the team I wanted to see net zero turnovers. That means we have as many turnovers as we have takeaways. Teams that have more takeaways than turnovers probably are in the AP Top 10!

Turnovers are an issue, but forcing almost zero turnovers on the defensive end is the bigger problem imo

Previous topic - Next topic