Main Menu
collapse

Resources

25-26 SOTG Tally

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross6
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 6/15/26 by MuMark
[Today at 12:35:49 PM]


2027 Bracketology by Hards Alumni
[Today at 11:24:10 AM]


NOLAN Minessale Coming to MU by The Sultan
[Today at 10:54:26 AM]


Big East offseason news by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 08:48:08 AM]


NM by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 01:35:29 AM]


Marquette Overload Redesign by TallTitan34
[August 19, 2026, 10:29:28 PM]


Judge Rules that Last Years Seniors Are Eligible for a 5th Year by Billy Hoyle
[August 19, 2026, 08:26:33 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  NA

Marquette
87
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 2026
TV: NA
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
89

dgies9156

Every game I watch, there is the repeated discussion about Marquette%u2019s propensity to turn the ball over. I%u2019d agree it%u2019s ugly but the question nobody seems to answer is how ugly is it?

Cracked Sidewalks, are you out there?

Two thoughts to kick this one off. Is there a seasonal statistic governing points off turnovers, similar to football? It would seem that one of the big reasons we%u2019re losing is points off turnovers %u2014 but I really don%u2019t know. Basketball turnovers and floor position don%u2019t as matter as much as they do in football, but for this Marquette team, they probably do!

In other words, where would we be if we were %u201Cnormal%u201D on turnovers? Undefeated? Probably not. But in contention for an NCAA bid? Most likely.

Secondly, what is a %u201Cnormal%u201D level of turnovers? I%u2019d throw this out for consideration. If I were coaching our Warriors, I%u2019d be telling the team I wanted to see net zero turnovers. That means we have as many turnovers as we have takeaways. Teams that have more takeaways than turnovers probably are in the AP Top 10!


panda

Quote from: dgies9156 on February 01, 2021, 07:44:27 AM
Every game I watch, there is the repeated discussion about Marquette's propensity to turn the ball over. I'd agree it's ugly but the question nobody seems to answer is how ugly is it?

Cracked Sidewalks, are you out there?

Two thoughts to kick this one off. Is there a seasonal statistic governing points off turnovers, similar to football? It would seem that one of the big reasons we're losing is points off turnovers — but I really don't know. Basketball turnovers and floor position don't as matter as much as they do in football, but for this Marquette team, the probably do!

In other words, where would we be if we were "normal" on turnovers? Undefeated? Probably not. But in contention for an NCAA bid? Most likely.

Secondly, what is a "normal" level of turnovers? I'd throw this out for consideration. If I were coaching our Warriors, I'd be telling the team I wanted to see net zero turnovers. That means we have as many turnovers as we have takeaways. Teams that have more takeaways than turnovers probably are in the AP Top 10!

Turnovers are an issue, but forcing almost zero turnovers on the defensive end is the bigger problem imo

Previous topic - Next topic