collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 06:36:38 AM]


Recruiting as of 9/15/25 by Uncle Rico
[Today at 06:23:38 AM]


Roll Call / Planning - Nov 9 vs. I4 at United Center, Chicago by barfolomew
[September 08, 2025, 11:54:41 AM]


Closed scrimmages by DefinitelyNotPorterMoser
[September 08, 2025, 08:37:50 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

brewcity77

Quote from: MU82 on January 01, 2021, 05:24:00 PM
Do we know that MU does not have this? I'm not saying we do; I truthfully don't know.

But some are talking with certainty that we have all but ignored Wisconsin athletes. That seems highly unlikely to me ... but again, I don't know.

This year was particularly odd from a recruiting perspective. I'm not sure if it was the case nationwide, but it seems like the lack of visits may have diminished the number of kids that stayed local. Just around Wisconsin, Hunter, James Graham, Logan Landers, and David Joplin all went out of state. I glanced at the 247 top-100 and it looks like 25 of the 100 have committed to in-state programs. That feels like a relatively small number, especially once you get outside the top-50 (eleven top-50, fourteen 51-100).

I also know we were after Hunter and Graham. We are still pursuing Podziemski. I'm honestly not sure either Landers or Johnson will prove to be high-major players, despite them both landing high-major scholarships.

panda

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 01, 2021, 05:54:43 PM
This year was particularly odd from a recruiting perspective. I'm not sure if it was the case nationwide, but it seems like the lack of visits may have diminished the number of kids that stayed local. Just around Wisconsin, Hunter, James Graham, Logan Landers, and David Joplin all went out of state. I glanced at the 247 top-100 and it looks like 25 of the 100 have committed to in-state programs. That feels like a relatively small number, especially once you get outside the top-50 (eleven top-50, fourteen 51-100).

I also know we were after Hunter and Graham. We are still pursuing Podziemski. I'm honestly not sure either Landers or Johnson will prove to be high-major players, despite them both landing high-major scholarships.

Graham is the biggest benefit for me. He has all the measurables of a high D1 talent but just didn't look it when I saw him play several times.

The Big East

Quote from: Trump Loves The Big East on December 30, 2020, 08:57:11 PM
I believe MU should have a recruiting dialogue with all High major prospects in the state.
Quote from: MU82 on January 01, 2021, 05:24:00 PM
Do we know that MU does not have this? I'm not saying we do; I truthfully don't know.

But some are talking with certainty that we have all but ignored Wisconsin athletes. That seems highly unlikely to me ... but again, I don't know.
I am not saying MU doesn't , I am just saying that in general any school should approach in state with a level of comprehensiveness . Relationship building over time pays dividends .

MU82

Quote from: brewcity77 on January 01, 2021, 05:54:43 PM
This year was particularly odd from a recruiting perspective. I'm not sure if it was the case nationwide, but it seems like the lack of visits may have diminished the number of kids that stayed local. Just around Wisconsin, Hunter, James Graham, Logan Landers, and David Joplin all went out of state. I glanced at the 247 top-100 and it looks like 25 of the 100 have committed to in-state programs. That feels like a relatively small number, especially once you get outside the top-50 (eleven top-50, fourteen 51-100).

I also know we were after Hunter and Graham. We are still pursuing Podziemski. I'm honestly not sure either Landers or Johnson will prove to be high-major players, despite them both landing high-major scholarships.

Thanks brew.

Quote from: Trump Loves The Big East on January 01, 2021, 06:17:33 PM
I am not saying MU doesn't , I am just saying that in general any school should approach in state with a level of comprehensiveness . Relationship building over time pays dividends .

Yes. I don't believe anybody in the history of Marquette fandom has argued otherwise.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

brewcity77

Quote from: panda on January 01, 2021, 05:58:06 PM
Graham is the biggest benefit for me. He has all the measurables of a high D1 talent but just didn't look it when I saw him play several times.

I'll be very interested to see what happens with the guys (like Graham) who saw their stock skyrocket during the heart of the pandemic. He really seemed to benefit from getting his video out to coaches, though was that basically just maximizing the effect of a mixtape? On paper, he does seem to have it all, but I'm also skeptical about someone whose ranking soared when games weren't being played.

MUDPT

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on December 30, 2020, 10:15:17 PM
Screw Wisconsin, hey.  Hit up Illinois.

No offense to anyone here, but I've always gotten the feeling that people here think their sports teams don't get enough respect. All of the professional teams however good, get overshadowed if their rival in Chicago has a hint of success. And of course, everyone that doesn't go to MU, thinks the Badgers should be in the CFP, Final 4 and Frozen 4, every single year. The "Magic in March" is fine, which every other state in the country does too.

Previous topic - Next topic