collapse

* Recent Posts

Does Bucky NOT have a Basketball NIL? by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:05:24 AM]


2024-25 Outlook by WellsstreetWanderer
[April 25, 2024, 10:03:37 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[April 25, 2024, 09:43:05 PM]


[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by Uncle Rico
[April 25, 2024, 05:51:25 PM]


Campus camp-out with cool flags? by FreewaysBurnerAccount
[April 25, 2024, 04:52:25 PM]


2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[April 25, 2024, 02:51:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Sweden?  (Read 58362 times)

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7417
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys

Jay Bee

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9061
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2020, 11:29:01 AM »
Any thoughts on how Sweden is dealing with COVID?

If their goal is for people to die quicker, it’s good
Thanks for ruining summer, Canada.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23738
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2020, 11:36:37 AM »
Nanny state health care.    Many single person households.   Relatively healthy populous.    A gamble, to be sure.    But if you have a population lacking co-morbitities as well as a well funded, staffed, and efficient health care system, maybe.     But that model does not exist in America.   
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11957
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2020, 11:57:30 AM »
It's strange that they mention overall population density.  The only reason they have less density is because it is a big country with a lot of wilderness.  Where most of the people live is just as dense as most other European cities.
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6084
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2020, 01:27:43 PM »
Nanny state health care.    Many single person households.   Relatively healthy populous.    A gamble, to be sure.    But if you have a population lacking co-morbitities as well as a well funded, staffed, and efficient health care system, maybe.     But that model does not exist in America.

Which model?

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2020, 01:36:35 PM »
It's strange that they mention overall population density.  The only reason they have less density is because it is a big country with a lot of wilderness.  Where most of the people live is just as dense as most other European cities.

No it's not. There are only 3 or 4 cities in Sweden that are larger than the greater Racine area.

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11957
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2020, 01:41:18 PM »
No it's not. There are only 3 or 4 cities in Sweden that are larger than the greater Racine area.


I said "dense." 
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23738
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2020, 03:14:26 PM »
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

MarquetteDano

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3233
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2020, 03:47:10 PM »
In term of per capita deaths, they are not exactly killing it (no pun intended):

Sweden deaths per 100,000 in population: 14
Norway deaths per 100,000 in population:  3  (a lot of similarities between Norway & Sweden, but not in COVID deaths)

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4775
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2020, 03:50:40 PM »
In term of per capita deaths, they are not exactly killing it (no pun intended):

Sweden deaths per 100,000 in population: 14
Norway deaths per 100,000 in population:  3  (a lot of similarities between Norway & Sweden, but not in COVID deaths)

Norway has also ran 4x as many tests per capita as Sweden. Sweden's numbers are then likely under-reported.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22910
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2020, 04:50:35 PM »
Which model?

Elin Nordegren? Great 9-iron, sources say.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

jesmu84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6084
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2020, 05:28:41 PM »
Any of it.

I thought our healthcare system was the best in the world? And universal healthcare was a terrible idea?

WarriorDad

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2020, 12:00:21 PM »
Sweden expected to reach herd immunity within weeks.  Maybe they got it right all along.  More pain upfront, but less long term pain financially and health? 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-stockholm-could-see-herd-immunity-in-weeks.html


They have scientists, too, and their scientists chose a different path.
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”
— Plato

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11957
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2020, 12:04:09 PM »
Sweden expected to reach herd immunity within weeks.  Maybe they got it right all along.  More pain upfront, but less long term pain financially and health? 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-stockholm-could-see-herd-immunity-in-weeks.html


They have scientists, too, and their scientists chose a different path.


“But Sweden’s 1,937 deaths is far higher in number and proportionally to Denmark’s 370 and Finland’s 141.”

That’s a lot of “pain.”
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

WarriorDad

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2020, 12:12:14 PM »
An interview with another Swedish epidemiologist who believes stay home orders do not work and not evidence-based. It will be fascinating when all is said and done as the world reviews the approaches taken, what worked, what did not, why an action worked in one place but not another (democracy, geography, discipline).  I don't know if what Sweden is doing is right, but they have been criticized for their approach.  Maybe they have it right?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/04/18/swedish_epidemiologist_johan_giesecke_why_lockdowns_are_the_wrong_policy.html?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_recirculation
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”
— Plato

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2020, 12:17:37 PM »
Sweden expected to reach herd immunity within weeks.  Maybe they got it right all along.  More pain upfront, but less long term pain financially and health? 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-stockholm-could-see-herd-immunity-in-weeks.html


They have scientists, too, and their scientists chose a different path.

So, on the same day Tengell gave this interview (praising his own policy), 545 new cases were reported in Sweden. That's up 39 percent from the previous day's 392. 185 additional deaths were reported as well. the largest number since the outbreak began.
Could be a one-day anomaly, could be him spiking the ball on the 5 yard line.

But given that no one has any idea whether herd immunity is a sure thing with this virus, or how long it lasts, let's hope for Sweden's sake this isn't a "Mission Accomplished" moment.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2020, 12:19:22 PM »
An interview with another Swedish epidemiologist who believes stay home orders do not work and not evidence-based. It will be fascinating when all is said and done as the world reviews the approaches taken, what worked, what did not, why an action worked in one place but not another (democracy, geography, discipline).  I don't know if what Sweden is doing is right, but they have been criticized for their approach.  Maybe they have it right?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/04/18/swedish_epidemiologist_johan_giesecke_why_lockdowns_are_the_wrong_policy.html?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_recirculation

"Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people."

Provably false.

buckchuckler

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 922
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2020, 12:20:21 PM »
I thought our healthcare system was the best in the world? And universal healthcare was a terrible idea?

Yeah, the universal healthcare systems in the UK, Italy and Spain are certainly the envy of the world.

rocky_warrior

  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9137
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #18 on: April 22, 2020, 12:26:12 PM »
Sweden expected to reach herd immunity within weeks.  Maybe they got it right all along.  More pain upfront, but less long term pain financially and health? 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-stockholm-could-see-herd-immunity-in-weeks.html


They have scientists, too, and their scientists chose a different path.

Well, I'm not sure I trust Tegnell's "science" - in the article you linked,

Quote
Tegnell said he was “fairly confident” in the strategy his agency had pursued but said it would be too early for the Swedish government to lift restrictions imposed to delay the spread of the virus. “A big part of the country has not been affected at all yet.”

But on March 5th - he also thought they had reached their maximum.

Quote
Anders Tegnell, Sweden's top epidemiologist, has been under increasing pressure. On March 5, he said that the spread of the epidemic had probably reached its maximum. At the time, only 94 people were infected in the country, a figure that has since shot into the thousands.

To the utter consternation of many Swedes — including former Prime Minister Carl Bildt — Tegnell said in a TV interview on March 18 that it was safe for people who live in the same household as an infected person to continue going to work or to school.

It's still a dangerous experiment - we'll see.  Also note, they do have some restrictions....

Quote
Sweden’s government has advocated working from home if at all possible and to avoid nonessential travel and social contact with the elderly. Meanwhile, restaurants, bars, cafes and nightclubs have been offering seated table service only, and gatherings of more than 50 people have been banned.

Frenns Liquor Depot

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3194
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2020, 12:30:21 PM »
I'd have to say any analysis of strategy is premature until we know how broad the infection & immunity is. 

This summation of the interview declared 20% infection rates based on anti-body.  So they need to at least triple this right? 

It wouldnt shock me if NY is at 20% and the hospital system was pushed to the brink. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/no-lockdown-in-sweden-but-stockholm-could-see-herd-immunity-in-weeks.html

The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 11957
  • “Good lord, you are an idiot.” - real chili 83
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2020, 12:33:12 PM »
Yeah, the universal healthcare systems in the UK, Italy and Spain are certainly the envy of the world.

Actually Italy’s is considered pretty good. The problem they had was it hit them early. Germany’s is real good too. 
“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” - Clarence Darrow

Frenns Liquor Depot

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3194
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2020, 12:53:20 PM »
I would also point out that Stockholm (metro) is only about 25% of the country.  So this really seems like a thin conclusion as of yet (20% of Stockholm has Covid and therefore best path)

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6654
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2020, 12:57:57 PM »
Couple of things.

It's way too early to judge Sweden's policy.  Give it a month and we will know if they had a good plan.

It would be foolish to compare Sweden to the US, density, comorbidities, etc.

MarquetteDano

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3233
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2020, 01:26:03 PM »
I wonder if we will not even know whether Sweden's technique is better in a few months?  We might need a full year, assuming a second wave hits.  Maybe they get clobbered now and then are better prepared for the second wave?

Compared to their neighbors (which is the best comparison given locale, wealth, culture, similar health care, etc.) they are not doing well.  Compared to the US,  they are doing about the same.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12288
Re: Sweden?
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2020, 01:28:53 PM »
Stockholm is as dense (or denser) than much of the USA. Their plan (protect the most vulnerable, get to herd immunity ASAP) will save their economy and likely save lives. In areas where our health care providers aren’t in danger of being overwhelmed it is the ‘least bad” plan I’ve seen. My guess is other countries will follow.