collapse

* Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???  (Read 214969 times)

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2050 on: March 28, 2022, 04:47:42 PM »
So, you believe Rock told that joke intending to provoke a negative (violent?) response from Will Smith.
Huh. Personally, I think he was just going for laughs.
How has every Comedy Central Roast not devolved into a royal rumble?

He wasn’t trying to get a laugh from Will Smith or his wife, which is to whom/about whom he said it.

He wasn’t at a Comedy Roast. He was at the Oscars because his movie was nominated for best picture. And he was nominated for best actor. And again, not all words are and jokes are the same. Specifics matter.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2051 on: March 28, 2022, 04:50:19 PM »
One has an expectation of mean spirited jokes being the entire point.  It's a bad analogy.

Mean-spirited jokes aren't expected at awards shows, says person who's never watched an awards show.
What you've guys have done has set up a world where violence is a natural consequence of a comedian telling a joke that hurts the wrong person's feelings. That's bullsh*t. What Smith did last night was an aberration.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2052 on: March 28, 2022, 04:56:18 PM »
He wasn’t trying to get a laugh from Will Smith or his wife, which is to whom/about whom he said it.

Maybe he was. Some people have a sense of humor about themselves, even their maladies.
But who cares? Must every joke appeal to every person in an audience, lest the comedian face the "consequence" of violence?

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10037
    • Mazos Hamburgers
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2053 on: March 28, 2022, 05:01:55 PM »
Team Chris Rock
Ramsey head thoroughly up his ass.

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2054 on: March 28, 2022, 05:16:46 PM »
Maybe he was. Some people have a sense of humor about themselves, even their maladies.
But who cares? Must every joke appeal to every person in an audience, lest the comedian face the "consequence" of violence?

Again, I have never condoned or justified violence in this discussion.

But someone would have to be pretty naive, sheltered, obtuse etc.. to not think there might be words you ‘d initiate to someone that would result in a physical altercation.

You seem to be saying that anyone can say anything unlimited, anywhere, any time, without the expectation of a confrontation, even physical. Obviously in life that isn’t true.

And again, any person that engages in any at fault physical behavior will also face consequences their actions too.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2022, 05:23:24 PM by shoothoops »

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2055 on: March 28, 2022, 05:28:08 PM »
Mean-spirited jokes aren't expected at awards shows, says person who's never watched an awards show.
What you've guys have done has set up a world where violence is a natural consequence of a comedian telling a joke that hurts the wrong person's feelings. That's bullsh*t. What Smith did last night was an aberration.


I agree with all of this. The joke was just standard Awards show fare. If you want some really biting stuff, listen to Ricky Gervais when he was host. Lots of people staring daggers at him - not one got up and slapped him like a little girl.

Rock has a new tour starting soon, so I’m not convinced the whole thing wasn’t just a bit.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2056 on: March 28, 2022, 05:30:07 PM »
Again, I have never condoned or justified violence in this discussion.

But someone would have to be pretty naive, sheltered, obtuse etc.. to not think there might be words you ‘d initiate to someone that would result in a physical altercation.

You seem to be saying that anyone can say anything unlimited, anywhere, any time, without the expectation of a confrontation, even physical. obviously in life that isn’t true.

And again, any person that engages in any at fault physical behavior will also face consequences their actions too.

That obviously is not what I'm saying.
But a comedian, in a comedic setting, should be able to tell a joke - even a bad or offensive joke - without threat of physical assault. And while you keep saying you aren't justifying it, by insisting assault is a consequence of a bad joke, that's exactly what you're doing.

After engaging in at fault physical behavior, Will Smith won an award, received two standing ovations and danced the night away. Such hefty consequences.

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2057 on: March 28, 2022, 05:54:28 PM »
That obviously is not what I'm saying.
But a comedian, in a comedic setting, should be able to tell a joke - even a bad or offensive joke - without threat of physical assault. And while you keep saying you aren't justifying it, by insisting assault is a consequence of a bad joke, that's exactly what you're doing.

After engaging in at fault physical behavior, Will Smith won an award, received two standing ovations and danced the night away. Such hefty consequences.

You have brought up many different examples. And each is unique.

Coming back to the Oscars, the reason for being there was his movie and its award nominations. He wasn’t there for the Will Smith Comedy Roast. So if Chris Rock wants to take a chance and go there, he has to know their might be consequences to his specific words.

In this example, you didn’t like that Will Smith wasn’t held more accountable for his actions too. I believe that is more of your issue here. That’s different.

That’s reality. That’s life. If you are going to bully someone else with words or actions, under the idea of poor humor, sometimes there are unfortunate consequences. I think we have all seen that all too often.

As I said before, if Chris Rock went after Will Smith by himself instead of his wife’s condition, or anything to do with her, he probably doesn’t go up there. 






« Last Edit: March 28, 2022, 06:06:15 PM by shoothoops »

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2058 on: March 28, 2022, 06:07:25 PM »
Coming back to the Oscars, the reason for being there was his movie and its award nominations. He wasn’t there for the Will Smith Comedy Roast. So if Chris Rock wants to take a chance and go there, he has to know their might be consequences to his specific words.

In this example, you didn’t like that Will Smith wasn’t held more accountable for his actions too. I believe that is more of your issue here. That’s different.

I'll just drop it after this, but you're wrong about two things here.
1. Stars routinely get roasted at awards shows. Is this the first Oscars you've seen? Or Golden Globes? Or even the ESPYs? There is nothing unusual or shocking or surprising about Chris Rock telling a joke targeting a celebrity audience member. It wasn't even the first time a nominee had been roasted during the show (see: Amy Schumer's monologue, in which she implied an incestuous relationship between the Gyllenhaals and called DiCaprio a cradle robber ... neither of which led to her being slapped).
2. I'm not at all upset about whatever consequences Smith faces or doesn't face. I'm just befuddled that some people are trying to normalize his behavior.

JWags85

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2994
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2059 on: March 28, 2022, 06:27:45 PM »
That’s reality. That’s life. If you are going to bully someone else with words or actions, under the idea of poor humor, sometimes there are unfortunate consequences. I think we have all seen that all too often.

As I said before, if Chris Rock went after Will Smith by himself instead of his wife’s condition, or anything to do with her, he probably doesn’t go up there.

Bullying? BULLYING?! He made A joke.  He didn’t sit up there and ridicule the Smith family for 15 minutes.  Talk about a stretch.

And poor humor…that pretty much the entire crowd (including Will himself) laughed and smirked at. There was no uncomfortable murmurs like when Gervais hosted, or during earlier Schumer jokes like Pakuni mentioned.

If Will doesn’t go up there, the joke barely gets a mention that day, much less the next, and nobody is horrified that he “went after her condition” cause he didn’t.

I guess I missed where the Oscars is a stuffy dignified awards banquet from Victorian era England
« Last Edit: March 28, 2022, 06:35:44 PM by JWags85 »

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2060 on: March 28, 2022, 06:30:46 PM »
I'll just drop it after this, but you're wrong about two things here.
1. Stars routinely get roasted at awards shows. Is this the first Oscars you've seen? Or Golden Globes? Or even the ESPYs? There is nothing unusual or shocking or surprising about Chris Rock telling a joke targeting a celebrity audience member. It wasn't even the first time a nominee had been roasted during the show (see: Amy Schumer's monologue, in which she implied an incestuous relationship between the Gyllenhaals and called DiCaprio a cradle robber ... neither of which led to her being slapped).
2. I'm not at all upset about whatever consequences Smith faces or doesn't face. I'm just befuddled that some people are trying to normalize his behavior.

You are trying to normalize that Chris Rock can say those specific words in that specific setting without a possible negative confrontation, even physical.

You are then trying to equate a joke about having young girlfriends to Chris Rock’s words. They aren’t the same.

I would say that you are trying to normalize that it’s okay to say anything to anyone any time without possible consequences or confrontation. Or at the very least you are doing this with comedians.

Normalizing the behavior would be saying that the person who initiates the physical confrontation doesn’t deserve consequences too if applicable in a given example. Had Will Smith injured Chris Rock, he would have had to answer for that too. But it doesn’t mean it’s surprising to me in any way what happened. Perhaps creating leas of these scenarios would result in less physical confrontations.

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2061 on: March 28, 2022, 06:38:35 PM »
Bullying? BULLYING?! He made A joke.  He didn’t sit up there and ridicule the Smith family for 15 minutes.  Talk about a stretch.

And poor humor…that pretty much the entire crowd (including Will himself) laughed and smirked at. There was no uncomfortable murmurs like when Gervais hosted, or during earlier Schumer jokes like Pakuni mentioned.

If Will doesn’t go up there, the joke barely gets a mention that day, much less the next, and nobody is horrified that he “went after her condition” cause he didn’t.

I guess I missed where the Oscars is a stuffy dignified awards banquet from Victorian era England

George Carlin used to talk about punching up as a comedian instead of punching down. A guy jokes about a Woman’s alopecia condition is punching down, not up.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2062 on: March 28, 2022, 06:44:22 PM »
George Carlin used to talk about punching up as a comedian instead of punching down. A guy jokes about a Woman’s alopecia condition is punching down, not up.

You sucked me back in, because ...that wasn't the joke.
 

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1801
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2063 on: March 28, 2022, 06:51:38 PM »
You sucked me back in, because ...that wasn't the joke.

He made a poor taste joke about someone’s physical appearance. That someone has a condition that contributes to that appearance. I am not willing to normalize a man making fun of a Woman's physical appearance.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2022, 07:42:02 PM by shoothoops »

Babybluejeans

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2064 on: March 28, 2022, 07:19:19 PM »
Yea…the idea that a throwaway GI Jane/alopecia joke could foreseeably provoke violence at an awards show? No. Move on, guy.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22160
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2065 on: March 28, 2022, 07:53:06 PM »
There are definitely possible consequences for telling a joke like that. But they should be reasonable consequences. What happened was not reasonable
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3689
  • NA of course
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2066 on: March 28, 2022, 07:53:10 PM »
Bullying? BULLYING?! He made A joke.  He didn’t sit up there and ridicule the Smith family for 15 minutes.  Talk about a stretch.

And poor humor…that pretty much the entire crowd (including Will himself) laughed and smirked at. There was no uncomfortable murmurs like when Gervais hosted, or during earlier Schumer jokes like Pakuni mentioned.

If Will doesn’t go up there, the joke barely gets a mention that day, much less the next, and nobody is horrified that he “went after her condition” cause he didn’t.

I guess I missed where the Oscars is a stuffy dignified awards banquet from Victorian era England

  i also heard that rock was genuinely unaware of jada's alopecia
don't...don't don't don't don't

rocket surgeon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3689
  • NA of course
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2067 on: March 28, 2022, 07:56:52 PM »
speaking of "what are you watching"  "gotham" on netflix and jada is fantastic as the character fish
don't...don't don't don't don't

CreightonWarrior

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2068 on: March 28, 2022, 08:08:12 PM »
Ricky Gervais’ monologues were the absolute best.

cheebs09

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4590
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2069 on: March 28, 2022, 09:14:54 PM »
There are definitely possible consequences for telling a joke like that. But they should be reasonable consequences. What happened was not reasonable

This. Smith could have pulled Rock aside after the show and said that wasn’t acceptable. He could have issued a statement and promoted alopecia research. Heck, he could have made a dig at him in his acceptance speech.

The joke can be too far and not be an invitation to violence.

StillAWarrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2070 on: March 28, 2022, 10:06:48 PM »
But it doesn’t mean it’s surprising to me in any way what happened.

Seriously? This wasn’t surprising to you at all? This completely unprecedented occurrence where a celebrity went on stage at a televised awards show and hit a comedian didn’t surprise you? I don’t believe you. The reason everyone is talking about this today is that it is very surprising. You might be the only person on the planet that wasn’t surprised.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

Jockey

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2044
  • “We want to get rid of the ballots"
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2071 on: March 28, 2022, 11:34:16 PM »
Bullying? BULLYING?! He made A joke.  He didn’t sit up there and ridicule the Smith family for 15 minutes.  Talk about a stretch.

And poor humor…that pretty much the entire crowd (including Will himself) laughed and smirked at. There was no uncomfortable murmurs like when Gervais hosted, or during earlier Schumer jokes like Pakuni mentioned.

If Will doesn’t go up there, the joke barely gets a mention that day, much less the next, and nobody is horrified that he “went after her condition” cause he didn’t.

I guess I missed where the Oscars is a stuffy dignified awards banquet from Victorian era England


I agree with every statement in your post. At the rate we're going, comedians will be banned in 10 more years.

lawdog77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2072 on: March 29, 2022, 05:26:48 AM »

I agree with every statement in your post. At the rate we're going, comedians will be banned in 10 more years.
And every poster who made fun of Chico's height (or lack thereof).

Hards Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6661
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2073 on: March 29, 2022, 10:07:20 AM »
Mean-spirited jokes aren't expected at awards shows, says person who's never watched an awards show.
What you've guys have done has set up a world where violence is a natural consequence of a comedian telling a joke that hurts the wrong person's feelings. That's bullsh*t. What Smith did last night was an aberration.

Are you intentionally misreading?  Neither of us condone the violence nor do we think it is acceptable.

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10028
Re: What are you watching in 2020 (or re-watching)???
« Reply #2074 on: March 29, 2022, 10:30:32 AM »
Are you intentionally misreading?  Neither of us condone the violence nor do we think it is acceptable.

If you think I've suggested you condone violence, then I've worded my posts poorly, or you're misreading them.
I don't believe you or shoot are condoning violence. But I do think when you suggest violence is a natural consequence of telling a joke - even an offensive one - in a comedic setting, then you're normalizing that behavior.
Normalize and condone are not synonyms.

 

feedback