collapse

* Resources


UDM 4

* Wisconsin SOTG

No Stud when we lose.
2019-20 Season SoG Tally
Howard1
McEwen1

'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 10/15/19 by Johnny B
[Today at 01:10:16 AM]


Brand new season, same old Wojo. by BM1090
[Today at 12:22:17 AM]


Did We Miss the Hausers Today? by harryp
[November 18, 2019, 10:11:03 PM]


Garcia Announcement by Lennys Tap
[November 18, 2019, 10:08:55 PM]


Pivot (al) Moments by Lennys Tap
[November 18, 2019, 10:01:42 PM]


Black Unis Tomorrow?!?! by MUEng92
[November 18, 2019, 08:22:38 PM]


Offense by 4everwarriors
[November 18, 2019, 08:03:07 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: Robert Morris

Marquette
61
Marquette vs

Robert Morris

Date/Time: Nov 23, 2019 - 1:00pm
TV: FS2
Schedule for 2019-20
Wisconsin
77

Author Topic: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection  (Read 3433 times)

Ellenson Family Reunion

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4560
MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« on: October 20, 2019, 06:27:08 AM »
#2 in Big East behind Villanova, with X & SH right behind

BE 2nd strongest conference

Windyplayer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2621
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2019, 06:55:40 AM »
Fantastic. Lot of variables going into the season as well. If most of those work in our favor, top 10 is not crazy.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 19947
  • Alan Bykowski
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2019, 07:25:37 AM »
Going game by game, it has us at 20-8 (12-6) and depending on who we play in Orlando, it would certainly have another win in our second game and a toss-up in the third (Maryland is 16, one ahead of us).

Looking at our schedule, lots of toss-ups. Purdue, Wisconsin, and K-State are all game we are 48-50% to win. I'll admit, I'm surprised how much the computers like Purdue. Top-10 in both offense and defense. Feels like the Edwards effect. Every Big East team is projected in the top-100.

Also, 4 ACC teams in the top-6, yet they are the fourth strongest conference.

shoothoops

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2019, 07:52:16 AM »
NM
« Last Edit: October 20, 2019, 08:37:06 AM by shoothoops »

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8029
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2019, 07:57:40 AM »
Offense #17 and Defense #34.  I think MU has a chance to be much higher on D.

Bucky at #45 which puts them 10th in the B1G at 16-14 and 9-11 = Madison Meltdown.

Many of you guys love T-Rank but KPom’s projections seem much more accurate to me, pre-season.

GB Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1519
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2019, 08:28:04 AM »
 How much does Michigan State drop once Hauser is cleared and playing defense
Nobody says "It's only a game" when their team is winning.

Uncle Rico

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 794
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2019, 08:32:51 AM »
Offense #17 and Defense #34.  I think MU has a chance to be much higher on D.

Bucky at #45 which puts them 10th in the B1G at 16-14 and 9-11 = Madison Meltdown.

Many of you guys love T-Rank but KPom’s projections seem much more accurate to me, pre-season.

I always lean towards KenPom but don’t dismiss T-Rank.  T-Rank has some fun features.  But I’ve definitely found KenPom to be the better overall predictor of things to come.  My hunch is given the strength/depth of the Big East this year, all the pre-season stuff will look wildly different by March
Bring Tony Bennett home

Ellenson Family Reunion

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4560
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2019, 08:52:40 AM »
Offense #17 and Defense #34.  I think MU has a chance to be much higher on D.

Bucky at #45 which puts them 10th in the B1G at 16-14 and 9-11 = Madison Meltdown.

Many of you guys love T-Rank but KPom’s projections seem much more accurate to me, pre-season.

Yeah if anything I'd reverse those, with defense being anywhere from #5-15 and offense being #30-50

If the offense can outperform my expectations, this could be a scary good team. Really hope Markus can stay healthy!

Dr. Blackheart

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8029
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2019, 09:18:04 AM »
Bart Tovik is a Badger lawyer who lives in Evanston and Pomeroy is a weather forecaster.  Hard to pick who is more accurate based on that 411.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 19947
  • Alan Bykowski
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2019, 09:32:00 AM »
Offense #17 and Defense #34.  I think MU has a chance to be much higher on D.

Bucky at #45 which puts them 10th in the B1G at 16-14 and 9-11 = Madison Meltdown.

Many of you guys love T-Rank but KPom’s projections seem much more accurate to me, pre-season.

I love T-Rank's customizability (is that a word?) and how you can really zero in on specific time periods. I wish Pomeroy would add a similar tool. It would also be nice if it was easier to look back at snapshots in time of what the rankings were on a given date. You can do it now, but it's incomplete and difficult to get to.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12356
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2019, 12:13:01 PM »
Isn't KenPom the one that ranked F%cky #1 for about 5 straight seasons? I hope they are as bad as the service now says, but we'll see.

As for MU, it would be wonderful to see if this rating (or even better) pans out. I'm a bit anxious about how freakin' important non-con is gonna be to this season. I know it's always important but seems moreso this year to me for some reason.
"Turn in your Erin Andrews cars with the drivel above you wrote."

-- hoopaloop

TAMU Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16100
  • A Reading from Wojo's 1st Slide to the Marquettens
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2019, 12:22:06 PM »
17 seems about right. When I ran the numbers myself I came up with 14 for MU. The talent level is unquestionably top 25 level. The questionable piece is if the coaching staff can depart from their system because I don't think we have the pieces to run the same offense we have the past four seasons
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
The courage to change the things I can,
And the wisdom to know the difference.

~Prayer of the Scooper

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
  • Al said tough to win title. I believe Al
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2019, 12:26:14 PM »
How good is this data before even a single game is played? 

I’ll wait...
Idaho, birthplace of Television.

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
  • Al said tough to win title. I believe Al
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2019, 12:30:44 PM »
Isn't KenPom the one that ranked F%cky #1 for about 5 straight seasons? I hope they are as bad as the service now says, but we'll see.

As for MU, it would be wonderful to see if this rating (or even better) pans out. I'm a bit anxious about how freakin' important non-con is gonna be to this season. I know it's always important but seems moreso this year to me for some reason.

He had them top 5 for a number of years which he acknowledged often.

https://kenpom.com/blog/on-wisconsin-the-faq/
Idaho, birthplace of Television.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 14938
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #14 on: October 20, 2019, 12:34:26 PM »
So, according to one measurement, the sky remains aloft.   17 seems about right.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

Class71

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1194
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #15 on: October 20, 2019, 12:55:31 PM »
Best news in a long time. Let's see if we can do it.
⛵⛵⛵⛵⛵

Hards_Alumni

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4290
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2019, 01:41:45 PM »
How good is this data before even a single game is played? 

I’ll wait...

Let me guess, its a crapshoot!

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
  • Al said tough to win title. I believe Al
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2019, 01:51:36 PM »
Let me guess, its a crapshoot!

This time of year...yes
Idaho, birthplace of Television.

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2382
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2019, 02:23:35 PM »
How good is this data before even a single game is played?

It's true that the 2019-20 Marquette team hasn't yet played a single game.

But apart from Symir and Dexter, all of Pomeroy's data is based on past in-game performance at the Division I level -- and adjusted for the level of competition. There's 3 seasons worth of data on Markus, Sacar, Ed and Jayce, 2 seasons of data on Koby, Theo and Jamal, and 1 season of data on Brendan and Greg. Those 9 players are projected to account for the vast majority of minutes played this season.

KenPom has proven to be one of the most accurate systems for predicting margin of victory. Like any statistical model, it's a tool for evaluation. The tool will obviously be much less precise at this point. Marquette's ranking 15 games into the season will provide a far better picture.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 14938
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2019, 02:25:19 PM »
The IU scrimmage bears this out.
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
  • Al said tough to win title. I believe Al
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2019, 02:56:07 PM »
It's true that the 2019-20 Marquette team hasn't yet played a single game.

But apart from Symir and Dexter, all of Pomeroy's data is based on past in-game performance at the Division I level -- and adjusted for the level of competition. There's 3 seasons worth of data on Markus, Sacar, Ed and Jayce, 2 seasons of data on Koby, Theo and Jamal, and 1 season of data on Brendan and Greg. Those 9 players are projected to account for the vast majority of minutes played this season.

KenPom has proven to be one of the most accurate systems for predicting margin of victory. Like any statistical model, it's a tool for evaluation. The tool will obviously be much less precise at this point. Marquette's ranking 15 games into the season will provide a far better picture.

I get that part, but with 350 teams, some having massive changes, some only minor changes, there are a lot of variables outside of MU that also influence these ratings....let alone the departure of two key starters from our squad. 

I don’t know if pomeroy provides last year’s beginning of season numbers or not.
Idaho, birthplace of Television.

MUDPT

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2019, 03:11:01 PM »
I get that part, but with 350 teams, some having massive changes, some only minor changes, there are a lot of variables outside of MU that also influence these ratings....let alone the departure of two key starters from our squad. 

I don’t know if pomeroy provides last year’s beginning of season numbers or not.

He does. MU was 29 and ended 33.

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7892
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2019, 05:01:57 PM »
Butler at 33???
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 19947
  • Alan Bykowski
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2019, 05:23:35 PM »
Butler at 33???

I'll be honest, I think that's batcrap crazy. I'm not even sure they're an NIT team.

Cheeks

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
  • Al said tough to win title. I believe Al
Re: MU #17 in KenPom 2020 projection
« Reply #24 on: October 20, 2019, 08:13:34 PM »
He does. MU was 29 and ended 33.

Curious where that info is.  I have a subscription to pomeroy but couldn’t find it...thanks in advance.
Idaho, birthplace of Television.